trophywinner wrote:nov 4th
Bulls are gonna be lights out from the perimeter this season. Meaning.. turn the lights out cuz this sh*t gon be ugly!!
Moderators: mpharris36, Jeff Van Gully, Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, dakomish23, GONYK
trophywinner wrote:nov 4th
moocow007 wrote:trophywinner wrote:
Wow...In the deposition Keyana LaVergne, a former colleague of the accuser at the property management firm GHP, says she came into work just hours after the alleged rape and “didn’t seem battered. She didn’t seem off.”
“She was at work behaving normally,” LaVergne testified.
In fact she even showed LaVergne photos of herself in a sex harness she’d bought for Rose and laughed about it, according to court papers.
“She was giggling a little bit as she watched me Google it,” LaVergne recalls in a sworn statement. “I could not figure out exactly what a sex belt was, so she explained to me that a sex belt with two bars for the man to hold enables the man to get leverage and hold the bars during the ‘doggie style’ position.”
LaVergne also claims: “Not one time did ‘rape’ come out of her mouth.”
The depositions buttress the remark by Rose’s lawyer in opening statements that the Los Angeles civil suit is a “sad effort to get a lottery hit.”
The accuser was “broke at the time” of the 2015 civil suit and “needed money,” LaVergne said.
At one point the accuser even texted LaVergne admitting, “I need a very wealthy good man.”
The accuser’s lawyers insist the testimony is “irrelevant” and based on hearsay or opinion.
Honestly based on everything this is basically where I'm at with this
What's also shady is the talk that she was hoping Rose settles out of court. If this was really about rape and not the money then you'd think she'd stand her ground so that a court of law (even a civil one) would be able to find that she was telling the truth. Apparently truth not as important as a few million.
I mean think about it.
There are also portions of LaVergne’s depositions that support the accuser’s claims. LaVergne says her coworker told her “she drank a lot” on the night in question that she “was not sure what happened.”
RHODEY wrote:Swoosh_Stripes wrote:NYKAL wrote:
I have a different outlook. I'd rather have Jennings getting easy shots for Melo and Proz as opposed to taking shot away from them. With Rose in the starting Lineup, he's looking to Score 1st while we already have very good scorers on the floor.
Jennings is not exactly J. Kidd out there either, he's also a score 1st PG.
IMO he is in the John Wall Mode (ofcourse not as good!) Scoring point who also has a passing mentality. You can see Jennings takes as much pride in a dazzling assist as he does with drive to the hoop. We may have lucked out and caught him at just the right time. A time were he has matured enough to impact the game in several ways. Keep in mind that he has never been on a team with this kind of offensive talent. Had he not been injured he was already on his way to playing like this...

Derrick Rose is again asking for dismissal of his civil rape case - this time over trial testimony he says was out of bounds.
Rose's lawyers filed a motion in federal court Monday claiming the Jane Doe accuser now suing the Knicks guard for $21.5 million violated a court order when her lawyer put her ex-roommate on the stand Friday and solicited testimony about a bloody blanket and condoms previously deemed inadmissible.


Sark wrote:moocow007 wrote:trophywinner wrote:
Wow...In the deposition Keyana LaVergne, a former colleague of the accuser at the property management firm GHP, says she came into work just hours after the alleged rape and “didn’t seem battered. She didn’t seem off.”
“She was at work behaving normally,” LaVergne testified.
In fact she even showed LaVergne photos of herself in a sex harness she’d bought for Rose and laughed about it, according to court papers.
“She was giggling a little bit as she watched me Google it,” LaVergne recalls in a sworn statement. “I could not figure out exactly what a sex belt was, so she explained to me that a sex belt with two bars for the man to hold enables the man to get leverage and hold the bars during the ‘doggie style’ position.”
LaVergne also claims: “Not one time did ‘rape’ come out of her mouth.”
The depositions buttress the remark by Rose’s lawyer in opening statements that the Los Angeles civil suit is a “sad effort to get a lottery hit.”
The accuser was “broke at the time” of the 2015 civil suit and “needed money,” LaVergne said.
At one point the accuser even texted LaVergne admitting, “I need a very wealthy good man.”
The accuser’s lawyers insist the testimony is “irrelevant” and based on hearsay or opinion.
Honestly based on everything this is basically where I'm at with this
What's also shady is the talk that she was hoping Rose settles out of court. If this was really about rape and not the money then you'd think she'd stand her ground so that a court of law (even a civil one) would be able to find that she was telling the truth. Apparently truth not as important as a few million.
I mean think about it.
Why did you leave this part out of article?There are also portions of LaVergne’s depositions that support the accuser’s claims. LaVergne says her coworker told her “she drank a lot” on the night in question that she “was not sure what happened.”

moocow007 wrote:Sark wrote:
Why did you leave this part out of article?There are also portions of LaVergne’s depositions that support the accuser’s claims. LaVergne says her coworker told her “she drank a lot” on the night in question that she “was not sure what happened.”
You should check who quoted what. I think your question is directed at 'trophywinner'.
