technicality costs LAD the game?

Pharmcat · Post #1 » by **Pharmcat** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:33 am

sure mattingly messed up, but the umps erred too and had LAD protested, game couldve been replayed

fail on LAD part for not knowing the rules

first the incident

http://losangeles.dodgers.mlb.com/news/ ... sp&c_id=la

then why the umps erred

http://sports.espn.go.com/los-angeles/m ... id=5399491

Post #2 » by **craig01** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:45 am

Bizarre.

Lesson(s) learned.

Bay_Areas_Finest · Post #3 » by **Bay_Areas_Finest** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:21 pm

So stupid. You can bend the rules. It's not as if Mattingly walked all the way to the dugout or even the chalk and then came back. He was talking to his f'ing infielder.

Bochy is an idiot.

Post #4 » by **craig01** » Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:14 am

Bay_Areas_Finest wrote:So stupid. You can bend the rules. It's not as if Mattingly walked all the way to the dugout or even the chalk and then came back. He was talking to his f'ing infielder.

Bochy is an idiot.

Pretty smart really...LOL

Post #5 » by **Stanford** » Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:03 pm

'Cost LAD the game' is pushing it don't you think? Broxton had loaded the bases already, and Torres hits far better against RHP than LHP.

Post #6 » by **Gremz** » Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:11 am

I'm with Stanford on this one, pretty much because I know nothing about baseball and his pokemon sig is the least annoying.

El Turco · Post #7 » by **El Turco** » Thu Aug 5, 2010 6:47 am

Stanford does make a good point but there are two sides to every story.