ImageImageImage

MIN-NYK-MEM from trade board

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

MIN-NYK-MEM from trade board 

Post#1 » by shrink » Sat Dec 11, 2010 11:19 pm

I thought this one was interesting enough to bring over, especially with a Mayo-to-NYK rumor floating around.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1074548

Manhattan Project wrote: NYK GETS: O.J. Mayo
NYK GIVES: Azubuike + Anthony Randolph+ Bill Walker

MEM GETS: Azubuike + Ellington + MEM 1st
MEM GIVES: O.J. Mayo

MIN GETS: Anthony Randolph + Bill Walker
MIN GIVES: Ellington + MEM 1st


Why for Knicks: Move Randolph and Walker, two players glued to the bench for a dynamic sixth man and is an attractive trade piece.

Why for Grizz: Get their own first round pick back so it don't bite them in the ass and a young shooting guard that can play a little. Keleena is a plus if he can play, but doubtful.

Why for Wolves: Land Randolph who the fans seem to love and also pick up a solid young cheap player in Walker.


Interesting?

I'd also point out that MIN's package is what basically gets Mayo. Would Wolves fans prefer Mayo or Randolph here?
User avatar
UK-Wolf
Pro Prospect
Posts: 978
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 04, 2010
Location: Burnley, England.

Re: MIN-NJN-MEM from trade board 

Post#2 » by UK-Wolf » Sat Dec 11, 2010 11:30 pm

I'd prefer Randolph, I think he's a promising athletic big which is what we really lack at the moment, good rebounder, decent scorer and can block a shot or two. I'd definitely do that trade.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: MIN-NJN-MEM from trade board 

Post#3 » by shangrila » Sat Dec 11, 2010 11:32 pm

I'd like both, since it furthers our ultimate goal to collect every non-superstar rotation player from the 2008 draft. But if I had to pick it'd be Randolph. He still has the potential to be something more then he currently is.

I think they could acquire both though if they really wanted. Replace Azubuike with Brewer, for instance, and I doubt Memphis would say no if they'd agree to the original deal. Then you're free to deal the Utah 1st for Randolph.
User avatar
teven_1
Rookie
Posts: 1,201
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 01, 2010

Re: MIN-NJN-MEM from trade board 

Post#4 » by teven_1 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 11:33 pm

meh, I'm over Anthony Randolph, not because I don't think he can be good but honestly we're set at 3,4,5 positions. We pretty much have a log jam at every position and since he's a project he's gonna need minutes. If you want to give him Tollivers minutes then I guess...
"Look at me. I'm running like a young deer."- Andrei Kirilenko
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,524
And1: 4,983
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: MIN-NYK-MEM from trade board 

Post#5 » by theGreatRC » Sat Dec 11, 2010 11:59 pm

Anthony Randolph screams head case to me. I know he's not getting PT, but whenever I catch a Knicks game, he is never cheering for his teammates and he's so dead in the huddles. I feel like if we give him minimal PT, he would just pout and bitch.
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: MIN-NYK-MEM from trade board 

Post#6 » by Esohny » Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:02 am

Honestly, if the same package gets Mayo or Randolph, I go with Mayo.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
User avatar
teven_1
Rookie
Posts: 1,201
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 01, 2010

Re: MIN-NYK-MEM from trade board 

Post#7 » by teven_1 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:03 am

theGreatRC wrote:Anthony Randolph screams head case to me. I know he's not getting PT, but whenever I catch a Knicks game, he is never cheering for his teammates and he's so dead in the huddles. I feel like if we give him minimal PT, he would just pout and bitch.


and given our roster he would get minimal minutes. Pretty much outside of potential and height he wont be bringing us much.
He can shoot and block shots but so can Tolliver and Tolliver is a more proven vet.

I believe in Randolph but coming to Minny wont do his career any good and really wont do our team any good.

Indiana could work
"Look at me. I'm running like a young deer."- Andrei Kirilenko
B Calrissian
Head Coach
Posts: 6,928
And1: 17
Joined: Sep 22, 2007

Re: MIN-NYK-MEM from trade board 

Post#8 » by B Calrissian » Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:17 am

I'd go with Randolph over Mayo for a couple reasons. Mayo seems like an awful fit with our core. He doesn't play defense and wants to dominate the ball. If we want to let a player dominate the ball why not just have Rubio do it? Also because I feel much more comfortable with our back up wings than I am in our back up bigs (sorry Pek).
User avatar
teven_1
Rookie
Posts: 1,201
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 01, 2010

Re: MIN-NYK-MEM from trade board 

Post#9 » by teven_1 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:19 am

B Calrissian wrote:I'd go with Randolph over Mayo for a couple reasons. Mayo seems like an awful fit with our core. He doesn't play defense and wants to dominate the ball. If we want to let a player dominate the ball why not just have Rubio do it? Also because I feel much more comfortable with our back up wings than I am in our back up bigs (sorry Pek).


I haven't really watched AR play but I will say a good thing about Pek is he likes to get down and dirty in the post. He's a post man, not a 7 footer trying to play SG.

AR is pretty skinny and would be great in a running offense but given our style of play if he doesn't have post moves, I dunno...
He's pretty skinny too
"Look at me. I'm running like a young deer."- Andrei Kirilenko
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: MIN-NYK-MEM from trade board 

Post#10 » by shangrila » Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:40 am

Randolph's versatility would let him play up to 3 positions here. I don't think finding minutes would be a huge issue for him.
User avatar
teven_1
Rookie
Posts: 1,201
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 01, 2010

Re: MIN-NYK-MEM from trade board 

Post#11 » by teven_1 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:21 am

shangrila wrote:Randolph's versatility would let him play up to 3 positions here. I don't think finding minutes would be a huge issue for him.


we have a log jam as it is and he's unproven. the 3 positions logic should be getting him minutes at NYC
"Look at me. I'm running like a young deer."- Andrei Kirilenko
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: MIN-NYK-MEM from trade board 

Post#12 » by shangrila » Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:42 am

Different system and expectations. They need rebounding, we need shot blocking. They need shooters, we need passing big men. He'll fit, I guarantee that.
User avatar
Flash4thewin
RealGM
Posts: 13,410
And1: 9,695
Joined: Jan 27, 2006

Re: MIN-NJN-MEM from trade board 

Post#13 » by Flash4thewin » Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:48 pm

shangrila wrote:I'd like both, since it furthers our ultimate goal to collect every non-superstar rotation player from the 2008 draft. But if I had to pick it'd be Randolph. He still has the potential to be something more then he currently is.

I think they could acquire both though if they really wanted. Replace Azubuike with Brewer, for instance, and I doubt Memphis would say no if they'd agree to the original deal. Then you're free to deal the Utah 1st for Randolph.


lol. If any team can bring out the best in Randolph i think its the Wolves. He would make a great backup to Beasley and Love. Mayo is interesting but i dont see his upside as being to high. For Mayo to excel he will need to switch to PG, the last thing this team needs with Rubio on the way
User avatar
TrentTuckerForever
Starter
Posts: 2,100
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 23, 2001
Location: St. Paul

Re: MIN-NYK-MEM from trade board 

Post#14 » by TrentTuckerForever » Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:59 pm

shrink wrote:I'd also point out that MIN's package is what basically gets Mayo. Would Wolves fans prefer Mayo or Randolph here?


Great question - I think it's Mayo by a nose. I love Randolph's game. If Beasley/Love/Darko is the frontline for the forseeable future, Randolph's talents, potentially at all three positions, are the perfect match on paper.

But the reality I think would be that Randolph would be frustrated that that's all his role could ever be - he's not established enough to accept a bench role on a losing team. It would be akin to asking Beasley to play off the bench when he came here... no way he'd maximize his talents in that arrangement. The perfect guy to back up Beasley/Love/Darko is already on the roster - Anthony Tolliver is a career journeyman who's had to scrap and fight for every minute in the league. He's great locker room guy who accepts his role. I know he's hurt right now, but he's the better frontcourt fit for this team.

Mayo would be terrific in the triangle, and his shooting has been better than advertised at draft time. He's a real pro who's going to keep working to get better, even if he isn't the perfect physical specimen for his position (sounds a little like Love, no?) I know people are worried about Wes's development, but I think if you can get Mayo for your 3rd string SG and a pick, you have to do it.
Klomp wrote:Didn't Brad Miller back up Vlade Divac in SAC too?
Peezo
Rookie
Posts: 1,051
And1: 79
Joined: Apr 06, 2010

Re: MIN-NYK-MEM from trade board 

Post#15 » by Peezo » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:04 pm

The Wolves have to be a somewhat ideal situation* for players who are in jeopardy of being labeled a bust. Look at Beas, Darko, and even Telfair. All are playing very well right now. I think Bassy will probably hang on in this league because of the improvement he has shown here. He is a backup for life, but backups get to play in the NBA so I'm sure he'll be happy with that.

But Randolph should want to come here. There are no established players (Love is established in our eyes, but 6 months ago a lot of people wanted to trade him) on our team and plenty of backup PF minutes available with AT down.

I say Rando and not Mayo.
Turnover_21 wrote:So who do we get? Capspace? Is Capspace white?
Peezo
Rookie
Posts: 1,051
And1: 79
Joined: Apr 06, 2010

Re: MIN-NYK-MEM from trade board 

Post#16 » by Peezo » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:05 pm

*first time we've been ideal for anything
Turnover_21 wrote:So who do we get? Capspace? Is Capspace white?
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: MIN-NYK-MEM from trade board 

Post#17 » by shrink » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:34 pm

To be honest, it should not be difficult or expensive to acquire both.

However, in 18 months, we'd have to give new contracts to Love, Beasley, Mayo and Randolph. Ouch!
Peezo
Rookie
Posts: 1,051
And1: 79
Joined: Apr 06, 2010

Re: MIN-NYK-MEM from trade board 

Post#18 » by Peezo » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:36 pm

shrink wrote:To be honest, it should not be difficult or expensive to acquire both.

However, in 18 months, we'd have to give new contracts to Love, Beasley, Mayo and Randolph. Ouch!


Or roll them over into different assets. That might be nice if can bring their value up.
Turnover_21 wrote:So who do we get? Capspace? Is Capspace white?
User avatar
eyeteeth
Starter
Posts: 2,109
And1: 147
Joined: Jul 17, 2010
Location: somewhere on the Front Range

Re: MIN-NYK-MEM from trade board 

Post#19 » by eyeteeth » Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:22 am

TrentTuckerForever wrote: ...The perfect guy to back up Beasley/Love/Darko is already on the roster - Anthony Tolliver is a career journeyman who's had to scrap and fight for every minute in the league. He's great locker room guy who accepts his role. I know he's hurt right now, but he's the better frontcourt fit for this team..

Yes.

Mayo would be terrific in the triangle, and his shooting has been better than advertised at draft time. He's a real pro who's going to keep working to get better, even if he isn't the perfect physical specimen for his position (sounds a little like Love, no?)

Mmm, maybe.
I know people are worried about Wes's development, but I think if you can get Mayo for your 3rd string SG and a pick, you have to do it

I think this is it.
Mayo is a guy who could work out really well, he's inexpensive, and if he doesn't work, he has trade value. Futhermore, we need shooters, and that is certainly his calling card.

That being said, I wouldn't necessarily go after him. I don't think we need to do anything right now. We have a lot of players who will continue to get better, and who believe in their coach. We're fine. Let's just see what happens. If a guy like Mayo lands in our lap, great. If not, that's great too. :D

The real thing is what will we use these draft choices for? We don't need 3 new guarnateed contracts for players that might contribute in a year or two.
Image

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves