Week 12: Non-Packers
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Week 12: Non-Packers
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,601
- And1: 4,456
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Week 12: Non-Packers
Outside of the Thursday and primetime games, the lineup sucks. Chiefs/Stillers meh, Giants/Saints should be decent.
Bears/Raidas and Pats/Iggles may be interesting to watch at 3.
Bears/Raidas and Pats/Iggles may be interesting to watch at 3.
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 103,197
- And1: 55,709
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
Week Sunday early lineup but Thursday is very good. Even Miami, they've been great the last 3 weeks. I'll be in Madison Thursday, I don't know who their cable provider is but they better have NFL Network.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
- Aaron It Out
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,804
- And1: 3,101
- Joined: Jun 27, 2008
- Location: Black Mercedes
-
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
Madison has charter and I believe they do have NFL Network, it might be part of a package but I'm not sure. I got the letter about it right after I moved to a TW zone. Made me so angry.
EastSideBucksFan wrote:At some point this board is going to have to drop their stupid bullsht agendas and just enjoy the team for once.
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,625
- And1: 4,262
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
Aaron It Out wrote:Madison has charter and I believe they do have NFL Network, it might be part of a package but I'm not sure. I got the letter about it right after I moved to a TW zone. Made me so angry.
I may be wrong, but i think they just recently got. They, in the past, never had it.
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,601
- And1: 4,456
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
Yeah they got NFL Network (and RedZone) this year.
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,763
- And1: 6,963
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
Giants are in some trouble. Remaining schedule is @NO, vs. GB, @DAL, vs. WAS, @NYJ, vs. DAL.
I think the Bears still get in with Hanie, splitting their last six games. All they really need with their weak schedule is a game manager and then for the D to kick it in gear.
I think we see:
1. Packers
2. Niners
3. Saints
4. Cowboys
5. Lions
6. Bears
Falcons eliminated on H2H tiebreaker with Chicago at 10-6.
I think the Bears still get in with Hanie, splitting their last six games. All they really need with their weak schedule is a game manager and then for the D to kick it in gear.
I think we see:
1. Packers
2. Niners
3. Saints
4. Cowboys
5. Lions
6. Bears
Falcons eliminated on H2H tiebreaker with Chicago at 10-6.
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
- jerrod
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,178
- And1: 133
- Joined: Aug 31, 2003
- Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
-
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
first thanksgiving ever for the Ravens! (i'm reasonably sure)
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 42,327
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Dec 05, 2005
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
jerrod wrote:first thanksgiving ever for the Ravens! (i'm reasonably sure)
noobs.
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
- PkrsBcksGphsMqt
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,827
- And1: 1,417
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Madison
-
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
Broncos waive Kyle Orton. Looks like my guy Adam Weber could be moving up to 3rd string! 

BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
- PkrsBcksGphsMqt
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,827
- And1: 1,417
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Madison
-
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
My old roommate, who lives in Denver now, just said he heard a guy call into local Denver sports radio and was going off about how Adam Weber is the next Aaron Rodgers, haha.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,601
- And1: 4,456
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
You love talking about the Gophers.
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,807
- And1: 27,383
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
GrendonJennings wrote:You love talking about the Gophers.
Imagine how much he would talk about them if they were good or even mediocre.

stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
- PkrsBcksGphsMqt
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,827
- And1: 1,417
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Madison
-
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
trwi7 wrote:GrendonJennings wrote:You love talking about the Gophers.
Imagine how much he would talk about them if they were good or even mediocre.
Haha, true. I'll try to cut back.
Anybody think the Bears may go after Orton?
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,763
- And1: 6,963
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:Broncos waive Kyle Orton. Looks like my guy Adam Weber could be moving up to 3rd string!
Orton to Chicago makes too much sense.
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
- SheedsWeed
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,931
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 30, 2004
- Location: to all the killas and the hundred dolla billas
- Contact:
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:trwi7 wrote:GrendonJennings wrote:You love talking about the Gophers.
Imagine how much he would talk about them if they were good or even mediocre.
Haha, true. I'll try to cut back.
Anybody think the Bears may go after Orton?
That's what I was thinking. Maybe Houston too.
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,807
- And1: 27,383
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
LUKE23 wrote:PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:Broncos waive Kyle Orton. Looks like my guy Adam Weber could be moving up to 3rd string!
Orton to Chicago makes too much sense.
Kansas City too. How does it work? Do AFC teams get first chance based on record and then NFC teams based on record or is it just based on record alone? Either way Kansas City would get priority.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
- PkrsBcksGphsMqt
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,827
- And1: 1,417
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Madison
-
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
SheedsWeed wrote:That's what I was thinking. Maybe Houston too.
Houston would be nice since I have Andre Johnson in fantasy. I have major doubts about Matt Leinart's ability to be a competent NFL QB.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,406
- And1: 343
- Joined: Dec 23, 2004
- Location: Rockford, IL
-
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
Todd Haley is such a meathead that he probably truly believes that Tyler Palko is the answer.
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,625
- And1: 4,262
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
Id throw miami into the picture. They arent competitive this year but they wanted him earlier this year, so you never know. If anything, he can groom their next QB since they played themselves out of Luck
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,807
- And1: 27,383
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Week 12: Non-Packers
Matt Moore is playing well right now and Miami isn't making the playoffs. Really no reason for them to add salary at this point.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.