ImageImageImageImageImage

You Get Gay

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

User avatar
mkflournoy
Ballboy
Posts: 44
And1: 0
Joined: May 19, 2012

You Get Gay 

Post#1 » by mkflournoy » Tue Jun 19, 2012 8:59 pm

I apologize if this has been asked, and i'm sure it has been, but we memphis fans have been kicking around the idea of...

Rudy Gay and 25
for
Thornton and 5


Would kings fans be interested in that?

I know that is a lot of salary to take back, it works with adding chuck hayes as well

thoughts
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: You Get Gay 

Post#2 » by pillwenney » Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:39 pm

I'd have to consider something like it. Not sure if I'd pull the trigger though.
User avatar
boogie-reke
Head Coach
Posts: 6,919
And1: 244
Joined: Nov 05, 2010
   

Re: You Get Gay 

Post#3 » by boogie-reke » Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:53 pm

No, this trade is selling us short BIG TIME.

By this trade, even if we agree to value Gay and the #5 the same (and there's no reason why the Kings should do that as we need to get more in such deal IE dumping salary/pick/sweetener considering his overpaid long contract) - then you're saying Thornton = #25, which is way off base, so we're losing on both fronts.

#5 > Gay
Thornton > #25

Anyways in general, I don't think Gay is a good fit for us as another high volume, high usage offensive player.. I would much rather trade for guys like Iggy or Deng in terms of fit.
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: You Get Gay 

Post#4 » by pillwenney » Tue Jun 19, 2012 10:15 pm

Yeah. Good points, I suppose. I'll lean towards a no.
User avatar
YC42Balla
Rookie
Posts: 1,054
And1: 62
Joined: May 30, 2010
Location: NorCal

Re: You Get Gay 

Post#5 » by YC42Balla » Tue Jun 19, 2012 11:44 pm

That's the gayest trade idea, ever. :kiss
SAC-RA-MEN-TO #HEREWESTAYED
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: You Get Gay 

Post#6 » by SacKingZZZ » Tue Jun 19, 2012 11:52 pm

Not sure I'd even trade Thornton for Gay straight across.
OhioKingsFan
Pro Prospect
Posts: 905
And1: 92
Joined: Dec 27, 2007
 

Re: You Get Gay 

Post#7 » by OhioKingsFan » Wed Jun 20, 2012 1:40 am

Gay is a better player and a better fit than Thornton. Gay could play with Tyreke and help make up for the shooting deficiencies. The salary is killer, so we'd HAVE to be sending out some salary, either Thornton or Salmons. Thornton for Gay or #5+Salmons for Gay.
User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: You Get Gay 

Post#8 » by City of Trees » Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:21 am

SacKingZZZ wrote:Not sure I'd even trade Thornton for Gay straight across.



Now that is a little homer-ish :D

Talent wise there is no comparison Gay is the superior talent. I guess the only way I could see it your way is Gay's contract.
User avatar
YC42Balla
Rookie
Posts: 1,054
And1: 62
Joined: May 30, 2010
Location: NorCal

Re: You Get Gay 

Post#9 » by YC42Balla » Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:22 am

I actually like Gay, too. He's a great player. But I'd rather keep the 5th, and Thornton.
SAC-RA-MEN-TO #HEREWESTAYED
User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: You Get Gay 

Post#10 » by City of Trees » Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:28 am

Evans + Jimmer for Gay... Boom.
User avatar
YC42Balla
Rookie
Posts: 1,054
And1: 62
Joined: May 30, 2010
Location: NorCal

Re: You Get Gay 

Post#11 » by YC42Balla » Wed Jun 20, 2012 4:02 am

Evans Is King wrote:Evans + Jimmer for Gay... Boom.


I like it. :cuddle
SAC-RA-MEN-TO #HEREWESTAYED
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: You Get Gay 

Post#12 » by SacKingZZZ » Wed Jun 20, 2012 5:25 am

Evans Is King wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:Not sure I'd even trade Thornton for Gay straight across.



Now that is a little homer-ish :D

Talent wise there is no comparison Gay is the superior talent. I guess the only way I could see it your way is Gay's contract.


Contract it is. Putting Gays physical gifts aside for a moment, which is fair considering both play different positions, both players values are based on production potential. Gay will get you 18-20 ppg for 17 million a year. Thornton will get you 18-20 ppg for 7 million a year. Homer-ish? Nah, I don't think so. It's more likely the Kings find a good player to stick at SF than they can find a replacement for Thornton right now. Keep Thornton and go after a shooter/defender at SF, Fields or Batum.
The Beam King
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,749
And1: 774
Joined: Mar 01, 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
 

Re: You Get Gay 

Post#13 » by The Beam King » Thu Jun 21, 2012 5:58 pm

#5 + Salmons for Gay has some legs to it. No way you get Thornton.

Return to Sacramento Kings