ImageImageImageImageImage

Nets not better then knicks, time will tell!

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85

User avatar
aj49689
Rookie
Posts: 1,228
And1: 119
Joined: Apr 28, 2012
   

Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#1 » by aj49689 » Tue Nov 6, 2012 2:47 am

Is anyone watching Brooklyn fall apart towards the end of the game vs the wolfs? With this type of performance, I don't think their gonna be the best team in New york. I can't wait to see the knicks beat the nets and i hope its a blow out....mahahahaha
If you want, to destroy my sweater. Pull this "Thread" as I walk away.



CARROT SOUP!
User avatar
SpReEfOrAlL
RealGM
Posts: 11,330
And1: 161
Joined: Jul 29, 2002
Location: July 2010!

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#2 » by SpReEfOrAlL » Tue Nov 6, 2012 2:48 am

Who on this board thought they were better?
User avatar
ITGM
RealGM
Posts: 20,000
And1: 9,401
Joined: Jan 16, 2008

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#3 » by ITGM » Tue Nov 6, 2012 2:49 am

Time already told!
User avatar
aj49689
Rookie
Posts: 1,228
And1: 119
Joined: Apr 28, 2012
   

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#4 » by aj49689 » Tue Nov 6, 2012 2:50 am

The wolfs came back from 22 down to beat the nets. I don't know about this board but their has been enough talk around me to be very passionate about who's better.
If you want, to destroy my sweater. Pull this "Thread" as I walk away.



CARROT SOUP!
TheGarden
Banned User
Posts: 10,477
And1: 1,156
Joined: Jun 11, 2012

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#5 » by TheGarden » Tue Nov 6, 2012 2:54 am

Man I could care less about the Nets and being the #1 team in New York thats their thing we got bigger fish to fry
21shumpshumpst
Banned User
Posts: 2,654
And1: 36
Joined: Aug 14, 2012

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#6 » by 21shumpshumpst » Tue Nov 6, 2012 2:55 am

NYETS SUCK. They will always be trash. KNICKS >>>>>> NYETS.

Lol at their overrated, overpayed team.

You should hear how they defend their no defense, can't rebound trash center B Lopez.

That guy is a stiff if I ever saw one.

Then some idiot on their board said he would rather have Keith Bogans than Brewer. That is how stupid their fanbase is.

F the NYETS
PeteW
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,489
And1: 1,590
Joined: Nov 10, 2009
     

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#7 » by PeteW » Tue Nov 6, 2012 2:58 am

No one on this knicks board believed the Nets were better.. the GB on the other hand...
User avatar
aj49689
Rookie
Posts: 1,228
And1: 119
Joined: Apr 28, 2012
   

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#8 » by aj49689 » Tue Nov 6, 2012 2:59 am

I have a special dislike for the nets, its close to the hate i have for the celtics/heat. I can't wait until we fry the fish on the nets home court!
If you want, to destroy my sweater. Pull this "Thread" as I walk away.



CARROT SOUP!
Ron1
Veteran
Posts: 2,615
And1: 7
Joined: May 05, 2010

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#9 » by Ron1 » Tue Nov 6, 2012 3:01 am

ITGM wrote:Time already told!

Agreed. When you are beating a team by 22, then let them come back and win the game by 6, you can't really say you're better than anybody.
Image
Marc Berman, Ny Post wrote:...the Knicks went into Miami feeling their only chance of survival was to bomb away from the 3-point line, and see where the chips fall.
iHeartKNicks
Pro Prospect
Posts: 911
And1: 111
Joined: Feb 20, 2010
Location: Queens. Get the money

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#10 » by iHeartKNicks » Tue Nov 6, 2012 3:08 am

The Nets are all hype. Imo Joe Johnson is not the type of "Robin" you give Deron & expect to have winning basketball. But good for them for trying to skip the rebuild.
Twitter: AntBloom
IG: Antbloom
THE KNICKS WILL PREVAIL… eventually
User avatar
aj49689
Rookie
Posts: 1,228
And1: 119
Joined: Apr 28, 2012
   

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#11 » by aj49689 » Tue Nov 6, 2012 3:16 am

November 15th we will have a real test, we play the spurs on their home court. Spurs are one of the hotter teams ATM and have proven themselves year after year.
If you want, to destroy my sweater. Pull this "Thread" as I walk away.



CARROT SOUP!
User avatar
Tron Carter
RealGM
Posts: 17,546
And1: 20,147
Joined: Jul 20, 2012
Location: NBA Purgatory

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#12 » by Tron Carter » Tue Nov 6, 2012 3:21 am

ITGM wrote:Time already told!


Go to the Nets game thread for pure comedy. Already calling for Avery's head :lol:
Image
R.I.P Black Mamba
iHeartKNicks
Pro Prospect
Posts: 911
And1: 111
Joined: Feb 20, 2010
Location: Queens. Get the money

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#13 » by iHeartKNicks » Tue Nov 6, 2012 3:28 am

aj49689 wrote:November 15th we will have a real test, we play the spurs on their home court. Spurs are one of the hotter teams ATM and have proven themselves year after year.

Dont sleep on Dallas friday. They've been playing tough so far & they have legit low post threats that have given the Knicks problems in the past. Dallas has the ability to flip this board into hating Melo at the 4.
Twitter: AntBloom
IG: Antbloom
THE KNICKS WILL PREVAIL… eventually
KnickRyda
Ballboy
Posts: 43
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 07, 2010
Location: AUGUSTA G.A,

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#14 » by KnickRyda » Tue Nov 6, 2012 3:51 am

NoWay In Hell Go Knicks!!!
NYK Mentality
Banned User
Posts: 2,087
And1: 25
Joined: Jan 12, 2012
Location: Queens.

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#15 » by NYK Mentality » Tue Nov 6, 2012 6:48 am

First and foremost, the Nets will never be the number one team in New York. Never. They could win 16 championships, and that still wouldn't change the fact that the Knicks have the hearts of New York City. The Nets can have Brooklyn and their new arena, because the Knicks have all 5 boroughs (consisting of die hard New York basketball fans) along with the World's most Famous arena known as Madision Square Garden. This will never change.

I actually feel bad for die hard N.J Net fans who just lost their team/franchise. If they had state (N.J) pride? They've either turned their back on NBA basketball entirely, or they've continued to follow the Nets of Brooklyn. But not by choice. If those NJ fans ever wanted to pull for a New York franchise? They would've been (New York) Knick fans to begin with. For the "fans" of the Knicks who've now became Brooklyn Net fans? I'm glad, because they were never Knick fans to begin with. Brooklyn can have those types of ship jumpers.

Yes, the Jets and Giants both left New York for the state of New Jersey, but guess what? We kept our bloodline. We kept our history and roots. We kept the name New York. The name New York means more than the "Jets" or "Giants".

Picture this, although it'll never happen, the league would never allow it to happen, but picture this; Dolan sells the New York Knicks to a foreigner from Russia. That Russian owner then moves the team to New Jersey. We lost our franchise. The Knicks are no longer called the New York Knicks, instead, as a fan base? We're forced to watch the birth of the Trenton Knicks. Could you ever have a love for the NBA again? Not a chance in hell.

Long story short? When these Net fans post with a deep hatred against the Knicks? Please understand, that those guys just lost their franchise. They (deep down inside) envy us. It's more than the amount of championships too, it's the fact that New Jersey can never compare to New York (basketball wise). We've always been the mecca, and that'll never change. They envy us as a fan base, because they not only know but also understand that what happened to their NJ Nets franchise? Can never happen to the Knicks.

The Nets of Brooklyn can never hold the New York Knicks jock strap. Never. Their fancy arena can never be compared to the historic history of Madison Square Garden. The Nets may belong to Brooklyn, but the Knicks belong to New York City. All 5 boroughs.

Getting outscored 32-10 during the 4th quarter? By the Minnesota Timberwolves? That's the Nets for ya. Last but not least? How about they finish something, anything better than...

34-48
34-48
12-70
24-58
22-44

Before putting the Nets inside of postseason conversation.
User avatar
GettinitDone
General Manager
Posts: 7,572
And1: 4,682
Joined: Feb 09, 2012

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#16 » by GettinitDone » Tue Nov 6, 2012 7:06 am

A past his prime Joe Johnson gets traded to Nets to join a frickin selfish superloser Deron Williams, Brook "can't rebound, can't stay healthy" Lopez, Gerald "I ain't Crashin anymore" Wallace, and suddenly they're contenders??

Only nice from the bunch is Kris Humphries, yes he can get double-double numbers on a terrible Nets team, but can he maintain them good numbers for if the Nets become a winning team?
NYK Mentality
Banned User
Posts: 2,087
And1: 25
Joined: Jan 12, 2012
Location: Queens.

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#17 » by NYK Mentality » Tue Nov 6, 2012 8:04 am

LeBron James passed up on NJ.
Dwyane Wade passed up on NJ.
Amar'e Stoudemire passed up on NJ.
Chris Bosh passed up on NJ.
Carmelo Anthony passed up on NJ.
They failed to lock up Dwight Howard.

I guess landing Deron Williams in a panic move (after their very own Brooklyn native in Melo wanted nothing to do with them) along with the addition of a 31 year old Joe Johnson was their "Brooklyn Blueprint". Gerald Wallace?

:lol:
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,257
And1: 25,720
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#18 » by moocow007 » Tue Nov 6, 2012 1:03 pm

Where are all the baiters and agenda guys who were hoping against hope that the Nets would be better? Wherever you are..under whatever rock you may be...stay there and good riddance.
Pharmcat
RealGM
Posts: 56,844
And1: 19,334
Joined: Oct 05, 2002

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#19 » by Pharmcat » Tue Nov 6, 2012 1:04 pm

who cares bout the nets

enjoy knicks, got something good going here
Image
User avatar
MaseInYourFace
RealGM
Posts: 26,393
And1: 11,272
Joined: Jul 14, 2010
Location: North Jersey
     

Re: Nets not better then knicks, time will tell! 

Post#20 » by MaseInYourFace » Tue Nov 6, 2012 1:09 pm

iHeartKNicks wrote:
aj49689 wrote:November 15th we will have a real test, we play the spurs on their home court. Spurs are one of the hotter teams ATM and have proven themselves year after year.

Dont sleep on Dallas friday. They've been playing tough so far & they have legit low post threats that have given the Knicks problems in the past. Dallas has the ability to flip this board into hating Melo at the 4.


On the flip what about all the matchup problems Melo creates for them?
MIAMI HEAT BAF
G- James Harden
G- Malcolm Brogdon
F- Robert Covington
F- Paul Millsap
C- Dwight Howard
Bench: S. Milton, F. Korkmaz, K. Bazemore, D. Oturu, J. McDaniels, A. Caruso, T. Mann
IR: X. Tillman Sr., J. Nwora, E. Hughes,

Return to New York Knicks