ImageImage

2013 Rose Bowl Leadup

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,189
And1: 55,694
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

2013 Rose Bowl Leadup 

Post#1 » by MickeyDavis » Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:16 pm

In the wake of Wisconsin’s dominating offensive performance against Nebraska in the Big Ten title game, two questions arose:

Where was that offense -- which produced 539 rushing yards, 640 total yards and nine touchdowns through a variety of formations and calls -- throughout the regular season?

Will Matt Canada be as aggressive and creative in the Rose Bowl against Stanford?

After discussing the topic with individuals close to the program in the last week, it appears UW fans should expect an aggressive play-caller.

In short, those discussions revealed that Canada was constrained by head coach Bret Bielema for most of the season.

Canada, who is joining the North Carolina State staff after the Rose Bowl, said Thursday he had a great working relationship with Bielema. He continues to insist injuries affected the performance of the offense at times and his play-calling is often determined by the relative strengths and weaknesses of the opponent.

“Every game is different,” he said. “Certain teams give you an ability to do this. Why didn’t he run this play more? It worked last game.
“Because it wouldn’t work this game. Because people have different schemes, different players, different strengths.”

However, sources close to the program insist Canada was able to convince Bielema to allow him to do his job in the Big Ten title game.

The results were stunning.

“He just poured it on them,” senior tailback Monte Ball said Thursday morning before practice. “He wasn’t holding back. He wanted to call every single thing in the playbook and he did.

“He had confidence that it would work and we had confidence as well.”

With Bielema at Arkansas and Barry Alvarez coaching the team in the Rose Bowl, Canada should feel free to call the type of game he wants.

I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,805
And1: 27,381
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl Leadup 

Post#2 » by trwi7 » Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:17 pm

Stave is cleared to play but they're going with Phillips anyways. I don't like that.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 16,726
And1: 8,135
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl Leadup 

Post#3 » by jakecronus8 » Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:22 pm

I do. Means they'll do what they should have been doing for years (with the exception of last year with RussellMania) which is stuffing the ball down throats.
Do it for Chuck
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,600
And1: 4,453
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl Leadup 

Post#4 » by Kerb Hohl » Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:41 pm

This one is so hard to predict.

Stanford, by body of work, is better than the Badgers, no doubt. Then you have this idea that the Badgers were better and didn't pull out all the stops in their playbook until late and could also be sitting at 11-2 or something right now. Then you've got the whole idea that the entire Badger coaching staff is leaving and in a bit of chaos.

No idea who I'd take. I was feeling a 60-35 loss against Oregon last year I think and was surprised that we hung around. I actually have a good feeling about this one but I have no clue.

Stanford is going to have to spend a ton of time preparing for that massive bevy of plays that Canada unleashed. That could be hell for them, even if the Badgers go more vanilla. It's in their minds and how they must scheme now.
User avatar
crkone
RealGM
Posts: 29,170
And1: 9,767
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl Leadup 

Post#5 » by crkone » Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:05 pm

I have a feeling that Canada is going to be auditioning for a bigger job than that of NC State with this game, and will want to pull out all the stops.

Code: Select all

o- - -  \o          __|
   o/   /|          vv`\
  /|     |              |
   |    / \_            |
  / \   |               |
 /  |                   |
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,763
And1: 6,963
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl Leadup 

Post#6 » by LUKE23 » Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:18 pm

I'm going, so I'm pretty excited about this game. I think we play some inspired football and see a really close game.
User avatar
A Diddy2231
Analyst
Posts: 3,733
And1: 106
Joined: Sep 28, 2007
Location: NEW BEEZY
   

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl Leadup 

Post#7 » by A Diddy2231 » Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:19 pm

Badgers lose this game due to turnover differential
Johnny wrote:You betrayed me! You're not good. You, you're just a chicken. Chip-chip-chip-chip-cheep-cheep.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,470
And1: 11,482
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl Leadup 

Post#8 » by Turk Nowitzki » Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:29 pm

trwi7 wrote:Stave is cleared to play but they're going with Phillips anyways. I don't like that.

I think its fine but if we find ourselves playing from behind in the 2nd half and need to open up the passing game I would hope they don't hesitate to make a switch.
User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 27,697
And1: 18,076
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: LA
     

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl Leadup 

Post#9 » by RiotPunch » Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:29 pm

trwi7 wrote:Stave is cleared to play but they're going with Phillips anyways. I don't like that.


I'm good with the decision. Phillips has looked better and played very well in the B1G Championship. Stave, when in his groove, is the better QB-- but one has to think he will be pretty rusty.

Nice to have the luxury of pulling the plug on Phillips though, if he stinks up the joint or if he gets broken by Chase Thomas. Either way, it should be the Montee Ball Show.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,600
And1: 4,453
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl Leadup 

Post#10 » by Kerb Hohl » Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:33 pm

A Diddy2231 wrote:Badgers lose this game due to turnover differential


Badgers don't force many turnovers but also don't really turn it over.

Stanford forces a decent amount of turnovers but is also getting up there in their own turnovers.

Who knows, you could be right.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,414
And1: 8,025
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl Leadup 

Post#11 » by Mags FTW » Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:56 pm

Don't underestimate how much the guys will want to, "Win one for Barry".
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl Leadup 

Post#12 » by xTitan » Fri Dec 28, 2012 12:12 am

jakecronus8 wrote:I do. Means they'll do what they should have been doing for years (with the exception of last year with RussellMania) which is stuffing the ball down throats.


That won't work against Stanford or any very quality BCS program, need to pass effectively to win.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl Leadup 

Post#13 » by xTitan » Fri Dec 28, 2012 12:15 am

Mags FTW wrote:Don't underestimate how much the guys will want to, "Win one for Barry".


Don't underestimate how good Stanford is, since moving to Hogan they developed a very balanced offense in terms of ability to not only run, but pass effectively....Hogan can also run. Stanford's defense won't look foolish like Nebraska's defense, Stanford is fast and physical, simply running won't beat them
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,600
And1: 4,453
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl Leadup 

Post#14 » by Kerb Hohl » Fri Dec 28, 2012 3:02 am

I think he's joking.
Bucksfans1and2
Banned User
Posts: 16,041
And1: 189
Joined: Jun 28, 2008

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl Leadup 

Post#15 » by Bucksfans1and2 » Fri Dec 28, 2012 4:27 am

I think we lose but keep it close.
User avatar
Ill-yasova
RealGM
Posts: 13,364
And1: 2,562
Joined: Jul 13, 2006

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl Leadup 

Post#16 » by Ill-yasova » Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:16 am

I heard Ben Worgull from Badger Nation in an interview today and he said Alec James is wavering on his commitment. He's taking a trip to Oregon soon. It would be a massive hit to the program's future to lose a guy like him.

Return to Green Bay Packers