Would you guys do this trade?

CHA_77_B0BCATS · Post #1 » by **CHA_77_B0BCATS** » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:18 pm

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=c97j97k

Charlotte saves some money and gets some nice pieces to add to their young roster, building around Walker, Knight, MKG, Monroe, and Drummond. Also get expirings for TT's contract. The Detroit pick would have to be unprotected for this year's draft to make it fair though. They could potentially draft McLemore and Zeller perhaps, shifting two career bench players, Knight and Monroe to the bench for heavy minutes off of the bench.

Next year's potential key lineup for Charlotte:

Walker/Knight
McLemore/Knight
MKG/Taylor
Drummond/Monroe
Zeller/Monroe

Detroit does this because they get proven players with Henderson, Biyombo, and Thomas. Warrick is a great piece off of the bench as well.

Stuckey/Bynum
Singler/English
Prince/Middleton
Thomas/Warrick
Biyombo/Kravstov

It's a win win for everyone.

RTM · Post #2 » by **RTM** » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:27 pm

This isn't serious. Why waste time making this thread?

CHA_77_B0BCATS · Post #3 » by **CHA_77_B0BCATS** » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:30 pm

RTM wrote:This isn't serious. Why waste time making this thread?

See as I whine that Charlotte can't make a trade I'm deciding to propose my own.

Jodi · Post #4 » by **Jodi** » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:33 pm

Some of these Bobcats fans are either lame and bored or just plain dumb...Why would we do a trade like this??. Why, why, why???

RTM · Post #5 » by **RTM** » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:33 pm

Ok, now I see what's happened here. Fooled me for a second.

That's immature.

CHA_77_B0BCATS · Post #6 » by **CHA_77_B0BCATS** » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:35 pm

RTM wrote:Ok, now I see what's happened here. Fooled me for a second.

That's immature.

As long as it's all in good fun, right?

CHA_77_B0BCATS · Post #7 » by **CHA_77_B0BCATS** » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:35 pm

Jodi wrote::nonono: Some of these Bobcats fans are either lame and bored or just plain dumb...Why would we do a trade like this??. Why, why, why???

Aren't you the one who thinks Stuckey is a good player?

Walker>Stuckey.

Blkbrd671 · Post #8 » by **Blkbrd671** » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:37 pm

Mods please ban this poster from our board.

Gram · Post #9 » by **Gram** » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:40 pm

Lol I actually thought this was funny. :lol:

Mr. Krabs · Post #10 » by **Mr. Krabs** » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:58 pm

There should be some kind of maturity or intelligence test before signing up to this forum.

retrolenny · Post #11 » by **retrolenny** » Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:00 am

CHA_77_B0BCATS wrote:http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=c97j97k

Charlotte saves some money and gets some nice pieces to add to their young roster, building around Walker, Knight, MKG, Monroe, and Drummond. Also get expirings for TT's contract. The Detroit pick would have to be unprotected for this year's draft to make it fair though. They could potentially draft McLemore and Zeller perhaps, shifting two career bench players, Knight and Monroe to the bench for heavy minutes off of the bench.

Next year's potential key lineup for Charlotte:

Walker/Knight
McLemore/Knight
MKG/Taylor
Drummond/Monroe
Zeller/Monroe

Detroit does this because they get proven players with Henderson, Biyombo, and Thomas. Warrick is a great piece off of the bench as well.

Stuckey/Bynum
Singler/English
Prince/Middleton
Thomas/Warrick
Biyombo/Kravstov

It's a win win for everyone.

This might be the most ridiculous trade I've EVER read. Why don't you do a 3 way trade to include Gordon and another player to MIA for Lebron James and an unprotected 1st round pick??

Brt19 · Post #12 » by **Brt19** » Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:08 am

I'm sure there is some way to do more than that but congrats, your proposal cost more than %20 of a season by Hollinger's analysis. That's impressive.

Post #13 » by **roc** » Wed Jan 16, 2013 2:24 am

Gram wrote:Lol I actually thought this was funny.

Give it some time... you may not think so at that point. :oops: