ImageImageImageImageImage

OT: Braves trade for J. Upton

Moderator: JaysRule15

Raptors Realtor
Analyst
Posts: 3,583
And1: 3,530
Joined: Jul 16, 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

OT: Braves trade for J. Upton 

Post#1 » by Raptors Realtor » Thu Jan 24, 2013 5:53 pm

It looks like the Upton brothers will be reuniting in Atlanta in a package which at first glance doesn't appear to be too pricey for the Braves...

http://www.tsn.ca/mlb/story/?id=414362
CapeCrusader
General Manager
Posts: 7,750
And1: 92
Joined: Nov 07, 2008
Location: Gotham City
Contact:

Re: OT: Braves trade for J. Upton 

Post#2 » by CapeCrusader » Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:29 pm

Giant's are going to have a tough time in the NL with the Braves, Nats and Dodgers.
B*TCH ! You Weren't With Me Shooting At The Gym!
guvernator
Pro Prospect
Posts: 880
And1: 139
Joined: Jul 16, 2010

Re: OT: Braves trade for J. Upton 

Post#3 » by guvernator » Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:54 pm

Thats a turrible trade... for dbacks. Awesome if your are braves fan. Upton/Upton/Heyward OF :drool:.

Its funny 2 years ago, AZ was asking for Snider, Drabek + for Upton and many jays fans would have been rioting if AA had given up just snider and drabek, let alone additions.
User avatar
Gibby
Rookie
Posts: 1,142
And1: 361
Joined: Jun 06, 2012

Re: OT: Braves trade for J. Upton 

Post#4 » by Gibby » Fri Jan 25, 2013 12:29 am

guvernator wrote:Thats a turrible trade... for dbacks. Awesome if your are braves fan. Upton/Upton/Heyward OF :drool:.

Its funny 2 years ago, AZ was asking for Snider, Drabek + for Upton and many jays fans would have been rioting if AA had given up just snider and drabek, let alone additions.


That's the thing with prospects, one second they can fetch you an established major league star, the next year they can be completely worthless
Image
flatjacket1
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 66
Joined: Oct 27, 2009

Re: OT: Braves trade for J. Upton 

Post#5 » by flatjacket1 » Fri Jan 25, 2013 12:50 am

Gibby wrote:
guvernator wrote:Thats a turrible trade... for dbacks. Awesome if your are braves fan. Upton/Upton/Heyward OF :drool:.

Its funny 2 years ago, AZ was asking for Snider, Drabek + for Upton and many jays fans would have been rioting if AA had given up just snider and drabek, let alone additions.


That's the thing with prospects, one second they can fetch you an established major league star, the next year they can be completely worthless


Funny you say that when Upton, Heyward and Upton were all big name prospects just years ago.
Avp115 wrote:Bautista>>Mike Trout and Kendrick
Al_Oliver
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,500
And1: 201
Joined: Nov 20, 2011
       

Re: OT: Braves trade for J. Upton 

Post#6 » by Al_Oliver » Fri Jan 25, 2013 1:00 am

^ even some of the higher rated prospects end up boom or bust...
flatjacket1
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 66
Joined: Oct 27, 2009

Re: OT: Braves trade for J. Upton 

Post#7 » by flatjacket1 » Fri Jan 25, 2013 2:43 am

Al_Oliver wrote:^ even some of the higher rated prospects end up boom or bust...


Not denying that, but completely ignoring the fact that a portion do pan out is ridiculous.
Avp115 wrote:Bautista>>Mike Trout and Kendrick
User avatar
RyderMike
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,938
And1: 6,949
Joined: Dec 06, 2012

Re: OT: Braves trade for J. Upton 

Post#8 » by RyderMike » Fri Jan 25, 2013 3:12 am

flatjacket1 wrote:
Al_Oliver wrote:^ even some of the higher rated prospects end up boom or bust...


Not denying that, but completely ignoring the fact that a portion do pan out is ridiculous.


He never denied that a lot of prospects do pan out. He made a comment on prospects in general, that they don't always work out, even so called "can't miss" prospects . He didn't say they never work out.
flatjacket1
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 66
Joined: Oct 27, 2009

Re: OT: Braves trade for J. Upton 

Post#9 » by flatjacket1 » Fri Jan 25, 2013 3:30 am

Gibby wrote:That's the thing with prospects, one second they can fetch you an established major league star, the next year they can be completely worthless


He gave two outcomes;
a) Fetch you established major league star (insinuated via trade)
b) Completely worthless
Avp115 wrote:Bautista>>Mike Trout and Kendrick
Waylon Mercy
Banned User
Posts: 12,346
And1: 6,644
Joined: Sep 08, 2010

Re: OT: Braves trade for J. Upton 

Post#10 » by Waylon Mercy » Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:11 am

We've been interested in Upton for awhile wonder why Arizona have been shopping him for
so long and so hard. Not a fan of the package they settled on would have been nice to have
him but glad he stays in the NL.
User avatar
whysoserious
RealGM
Posts: 30,555
And1: 8,634
Joined: Jun 19, 2004
       

Re: OT: Braves trade for J. Upton 

Post#11 » by whysoserious » Fri Jan 25, 2013 1:51 pm

Atlanta-Toronto World Series?

How awesome would it be to see these two teams meet up again.
User avatar
Duffman100
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 47,794
And1: 72,144
Joined: Jun 27, 2002
   

Re: OT: Braves trade for J. Upton 

Post#12 » by Duffman100 » Fri Jan 25, 2013 3:49 pm

Wish we could somehow land Prado...
User avatar
RyderMike
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,938
And1: 6,949
Joined: Dec 06, 2012

Re: OT: Braves trade for J. Upton 

Post#13 » by RyderMike » Fri Jan 25, 2013 6:17 pm

flatjacket1 wrote:
Gibby wrote:That's the thing with prospects, one second they can fetch you an established major league star, the next year they can be completely worthless


He gave two outcomes;
a) Fetch you established major league star (insinuated via trade)
b) Completely worthless


No, he's saying how a prospect can fall off the map. They seem like can't miss prospects chalk full of potential (Snider and Drabek), but a couple years later, they may fail to live up to their potential (Snider and Drabek) and not become the stars you thought they would be.

It was not an either or comparison. It was a comment about how players do not always live up to their potential. There was no separation of being awesome or terrible, and that's it.

We all know a star prospect can become a star player, a solid player, an average player, a utility man, or a career minor leaguer. Projections are simply projections, not guarantee. His comment was in hindsight, dealing Snider+Drabek would've been a great deal for us, now that we can see that they didn't live up to the potential we thought they had. But a couple years ago we were hoping they would be stars, so we didn't do it.
guvernator
Pro Prospect
Posts: 880
And1: 139
Joined: Jul 16, 2010

Re: OT: Braves trade for J. Upton 

Post#14 » by guvernator » Fri Jan 25, 2013 7:10 pm

I actually meant to say that both sides (Snider+Drabek as well as Upton) lost value over the last 2 years, considering how little Upton fetched.
While we'd be ecstatic if such a deal came along again (hindsight and all), Upton isn't the superstar that everybody though he would be (although I'm not ruling out the possibility since he is still 25).
User avatar
why22
Analyst
Posts: 3,530
And1: 16
Joined: Nov 26, 2008
Location: T Dot

Re: OT: Braves trade for J. Upton 

Post#15 » by why22 » Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:25 pm

whysoserious wrote:Atlanta-Toronto World Series?

How awesome would it be to see these two teams meet up again.



Poetic!
Basketball_Jones wrote:BC holding Casey accountable would go like this:

BC: so I see you played Andrea quite a bit there when he was struggling
Casey: yeah I know, we needed spacing
BC: play him more (walks away)
User avatar
Kapono
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,292
And1: 299
Joined: Apr 25, 2008
       

Re: OT: Braves trade for J. Upton 

Post#16 » by Kapono » Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:46 pm

Only thing that should worrry atlanta is that they sure will strikeout a lot in the OF. Both Uptons and Heyward are known to strike out.
Alex Anthopoulos - styling on Major League Baseball since 2009
User avatar
Skin Blues
Veteran
Posts: 2,625
And1: 872
Joined: Nov 24, 2010

Re: OT: Braves trade for J. Upton 

Post#17 » by Skin Blues » Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:49 pm

RyderMike wrote:
flatjacket1 wrote:
Al_Oliver wrote:^ even some of the higher rated prospects end up boom or bust...


Not denying that, but completely ignoring the fact that a portion do pan out is ridiculous.


He never denied that a lot of prospects do pan out. He made a comment on prospects in general, that they don't always work out, even so called "can't miss" prospects . He didn't say they never work out.

You know who also doesn't pan out sometimes? "Proven" veterans. Doesn't prove much of a point to say that can't-miss prospects flop once in a while. There are exactly zero groups of players that always pan out.

Return to Toronto Blue Jays