ImageImageImageImageImage

Report:Jays HAD trades for Kinsler + Brett Anderson in place

Moderator: JaysRule15

User avatar
mini
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,288
And1: 115
Joined: Jun 01, 2003
Location: Toronto, ON

Report:Jays HAD trades for Kinsler + Brett Anderson in place 

Post#1 » by mini » Thu Jan 30, 2014 4:18 am

http://www.sportsnet.ca/baseball/mlb/anthopoulos-addresses-deals-that-couldve-been/

According to SN, Kinsler wouldn't waive his no-trade to come here, and we backed out of the Anderson for Santos deal at the end due to injury concerns.

Doesn't say what we had going to Texas for Kinsler.

Kinsler, traded from the Texas Rangers to Detroit Tigers for Prince Fielder in November, would have been a significant coup, given the upgrade he would have represented at second base and the dynamic tandem he would have formed with Jose Reyes up the middle.

But a potential deal was scuttled by the three-time all-star’s no-trade clause
Image
User avatar
zong
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,289
And1: 102
Joined: Sep 27, 2007
Location: Toronto
       

Re: Report:Jays HAD trades for Kinsler + Brett Anderson in p 

Post#2 » by zong » Thu Jan 30, 2014 7:37 am

My guess is Rasmus + reliever/prospect
Wo1verine
2015 Beat the Commish Champion
Posts: 17,585
And1: 11,768
Joined: Apr 23, 2010
     

Re: Report:Jays HAD trades for Kinsler + Brett Anderson in p 

Post#3 » by Wo1verine » Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:05 am

That's too bad - Reyes and Kinsler 1-2 would have been pretty fantastic :-?

Watch Anderson win NL Cy Young next year.
Image
BrunoSkull
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,435
And1: 17,968
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Report:Jays HAD trades for Kinsler + Brett Anderson in p 

Post#4 » by Schad » Thu Jan 30, 2014 3:36 pm

zong wrote:My guess is Rasmus + reliever/prospect


Depends on what Texas' motives were, I suppose. They were looking for at least a couple big bats, and it's also possible that their initial expectation was in acquiring that player through free agency before the Fielder deal presented itself, at which point something like Santos + prospect could have been more enticing than Rasmus (especially with the defensively-sound Leonys Martin in CF). Shift Kinsler's $16m on and they might perhaps have been players for Ellsbury/Cano.
Image
**** your asterisk.
User avatar
satyr9
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,892
And1: 563
Joined: Aug 09, 2006
     

Re: Report:Jays HAD trades for Kinsler + Brett Anderson in p 

Post#5 » by satyr9 » Thu Jan 30, 2014 3:54 pm

Schadenfreude wrote:
zong wrote:My guess is Rasmus + reliever/prospect


Depends on what Texas' motives were, I suppose. They were looking for at least a couple big bats, and it's also possible that their initial expectation was in acquiring that player through free agency before the Fielder deal presented itself, at which point something like Santos + prospect could have been more enticing than Rasmus (especially with the defensively-sound Leonys Martin in CF). Shift Kinsler's $16m on and they might perhaps have been players for Ellsbury/Cano.


Based on them getting Prince with serious salary relief, I don't think I would've liked what it would've cost for Kinsler. I absolutely loved him as a player, but I think he is 100% in a declining age curve and it will not get better. Sure, there's still room for blips and a weird season, but actual skills, actual ability, I think the Tigers will be lucky if it's just 0.5WAR per season curve. And here on turf, it would've been worse.

I know the common wisdom is Prince was a salary dump at least to some extent, but TEX got him on a 7/138 deal for a guy still short of 30, that's not bad in today's market for his skills. And unlike Kinsler, I don't think Prince is actually all that regressed. His power has gone down a couple years in a row, but watching the guy I can't see what's stopping him from getting back to .500-.550 SLG on .200+ ISO at least for the next couple years.

Obviously it's impossible to judge what was lost without knowing what was offered. If it was JBau, then **** no under any circumstances. If it was salary relief, I likely would've been happy. If it was Rasmus/Santos stuff, I doubt I would've been super happy about it, but that's mostly 'cause I am no longer a believer in Kinsler going forward, but YMMV obviously so I could see how some would've been ecstatic with that move.
Michael Bradley
General Manager
Posts: 9,442
And1: 2,140
Joined: Feb 25, 2004

Re: Report:Jays HAD trades for Kinsler + Brett Anderson in p 

Post#6 » by Michael Bradley » Thu Jan 30, 2014 4:03 pm

Rosenthal is saying it was Santos and Romero being offered (according to one of his sources) but he doesn't think that would have been enough based on what the Rangers ended up trading him for. It's possible the Rangers initially just wanted to unload his salary for cheaper contracts until the Fielder option became available to them.
User avatar
Graham's Cracker
Analyst
Posts: 3,203
And1: 647
Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Location: location location

Re: Report:Jays HAD trades for Kinsler + Brett Anderson in p 

Post#7 » by Graham's Cracker » Thu Jan 30, 2014 5:36 pm

Michael Bradley wrote:Rosenthal is saying it was Santos and Romero being offered (according to one of his sources) but he doesn't think that would have been enough based on what the Rangers ended up trading him for. It's possible the Rangers initially just wanted to unload his salary for cheaper contracts until the Fielder option became available to them.


It's interesting to think of Romero being used in a transaction. I was wondering earlier this off-season if there would be a team out there that would move a longer/more expensive contract for Romero with the hopes of saving some money and the small possibility that they could 'fix him'. The one team that came to mind was the Braves and Uggla. I thought something like Uggla for Maicer and Romero. It seems Uggla has fallen deeply out of favour with the Braves (his .179 avg last season doesn't help). They're paying him $13.2 mil per year. Maicer wouldn't be completely useless for them as he is versatile. They'd also save about $5 mil over the next two years. For the Jays, they seem to have no hope for Ricky so he's 7.75 mil of deadweight. Although we'd be adding $2.5 mil each year over the next couple of seasons, we'd be taking a chance that Uggla rebounds to a 2.5 3.0 war player. Projection systems have Uggla worth about 0.5 war more than Maicer as is (or about $3 million RTV).

I think it would all depend on how comfortable ATL would be with Pastornicky/Izturis/La Stella at 2B.
User avatar
Relentless88
RealGM
Posts: 11,794
And1: 101
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
       

Re: Report:Jays HAD trades for Kinsler + Brett Anderson in p 

Post#8 » by Relentless88 » Thu Jan 30, 2014 8:01 pm

Graham's Cracker wrote:
Michael Bradley wrote:Rosenthal is saying it was Santos and Romero being offered (according to one of his sources) but he doesn't think that would have been enough based on what the Rangers ended up trading him for. It's possible the Rangers initially just wanted to unload his salary for cheaper contracts until the Fielder option became available to them.


It's interesting to think of Romero being used in a transaction. I was wondering earlier this off-season if there would be a team out there that would move a longer/more expensive contract for Romero with the hopes of saving some money and the small possibility that they could 'fix him'. The one team that came to mind was the Braves and Uggla. I thought something like Uggla for Maicer and Romero. It seems Uggla has fallen deeply out of favour with the Braves (his .179 avg last season doesn't help). They're paying him $13.2 mil per year. Maicer wouldn't be completely useless for them as he is versatile. They'd also save about $5 mil over the next two years. For the Jays, they seem to have no hope for Ricky so he's 7.75 mil of deadweight. Although we'd be adding $2.5 mil each year over the next couple of seasons, we'd be taking a chance that Uggla rebounds to a 2.5 3.0 war player. Projection systems have Uggla worth about 0.5 war more than Maicer as is (or about $3 million RTV).

I think it would all depend on how comfortable ATL would be with Pastornicky/Izturis/La Stella at 2B.

That's an interesting deal to consider. I remember people here being interested in Uggla when he was a free agent. Romero is the forgotten man these days, but there are worse contracts than him out there and I'm sure there are teams that believe they can get him back to his best.
User avatar
Graham's Cracker
Analyst
Posts: 3,203
And1: 647
Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Location: location location

Re: Report:Jays HAD trades for Kinsler + Brett Anderson in p 

Post#9 » by Graham's Cracker » Thu Jan 30, 2014 8:57 pm

Relentless88 wrote:
Graham's Cracker wrote:
Michael Bradley wrote:Rosenthal is saying it was Santos and Romero being offered (according to one of his sources) but he doesn't think that would have been enough based on what the Rangers ended up trading him for. It's possible the Rangers initially just wanted to unload his salary for cheaper contracts until the Fielder option became available to them.


It's interesting to think of Romero being used in a transaction. I was wondering earlier this off-season if there would be a team out there that would move a longer/more expensive contract for Romero with the hopes of saving some money and the small possibility that they could 'fix him'. The one team that came to mind was the Braves and Uggla. I thought something like Uggla for Maicer and Romero. It seems Uggla has fallen deeply out of favour with the Braves (his .179 avg last season doesn't help). They're paying him $13.2 mil per year. Maicer wouldn't be completely useless for them as he is versatile. They'd also save about $5 mil over the next two years. For the Jays, they seem to have no hope for Ricky so he's 7.75 mil of deadweight. Although we'd be adding $2.5 mil each year over the next couple of seasons, we'd be taking a chance that Uggla rebounds to a 2.5 3.0 war player. Projection systems have Uggla worth about 0.5 war more than Maicer as is (or about $3 million RTV).

I think it would all depend on how comfortable ATL would be with Pastornicky/Izturis/La Stella at 2B.

That's an interesting deal to consider. I remember people here being interested in Uggla when he was a free agent. Romero is the forgotten man these days, but there are worse contracts than him out there and I'm sure there are teams that believe they can get him back to his best.

I think the whole appeal for ATL would be if they given up on Uggla at 2B for them. If so, the cost savings would be the most attractive piece they'd be getting. Izturis would work for them off the bench as an NL super(and I use this in the loosest sense of the term)ulitilty guy.

I don't really see Uggla 'rebounding'. However, it would seem that he'd be an upgrade over the internal options at second. He does a couple things well, take a walk and hit for power. By moving to Rogers Centre he might find a few more deep flies at Turner become HR's (his batted ball distance #'s were good last year). At the plate he's pretty much JPA with a better ability to walk. I don't think we all would have griped as much about JPA if he walked at a 12-15% rate.
Komodo
Banned User
Posts: 12,002
And1: 795
Joined: May 07, 2007

Re: Report:Jays HAD trades for Kinsler + Brett Anderson in p 

Post#10 » by Komodo » Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:03 pm

Helluva of an offseason.
User avatar
stealthmode
Starter
Posts: 2,080
And1: 2,596
Joined: Dec 31, 2013
Location: 18 Parkerville Crt
   

Re: Report:Jays HAD trades for Kinsler + Brett Anderson in p 

Post#11 » by stealthmode » Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:54 pm

that would have been sweet!
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,306
And1: 14,333
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: Report:Jays HAD trades for Kinsler + Brett Anderson in p 

Post#12 » by dagger » Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:46 pm

Schadenfreude wrote:
zong wrote:My guess is Rasmus + reliever/prospect


Depends on what Texas' motives were, I suppose. They were looking for at least a couple big bats, and it's also possible that their initial expectation was in acquiring that player through free agency before the Fielder deal presented itself, at which point something like Santos + prospect could have been more enticing than Rasmus (especially with the defensively-sound Leonys Martin in CF). Shift Kinsler's $16m on and they might perhaps have been players for Ellsbury/Cano.


Wasn't the Santos deal called off - allegedly - because someone failed a physical?

http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/eye-on-bas ... ll-through
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,435
And1: 17,968
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Report:Jays HAD trades for Kinsler + Brett Anderson in p 

Post#13 » by Schad » Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:59 pm

dagger wrote:
Schadenfreude wrote:
zong wrote:My guess is Rasmus + reliever/prospect


Depends on what Texas' motives were, I suppose. They were looking for at least a couple big bats, and it's also possible that their initial expectation was in acquiring that player through free agency before the Fielder deal presented itself, at which point something like Santos + prospect could have been more enticing than Rasmus (especially with the defensively-sound Leonys Martin in CF). Shift Kinsler's $16m on and they might perhaps have been players for Ellsbury/Cano.


Wasn't the Santos deal called off - allegedly - because someone failed a physical?

http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/eye-on-bas ... ll-through


Different deal was, yeah, and apparently the person who failed the physical wasn't Santos. That's part of the reason I wondered whether they might've been interested in him as one of the main parties in a deal for Kinsler.
Image
**** your asterisk.
User avatar
satyr9
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,892
And1: 563
Joined: Aug 09, 2006
     

Re: Report:Jays HAD trades for Kinsler + Brett Anderson in p 

Post#14 » by satyr9 » Mon Feb 3, 2014 8:43 pm

The Rangers apparently like Santos, I'm happy to trade the risk for risk and take Neftali back in exchange. :D

Return to Toronto Blue Jays