Is it me or does it just seem petty when we have users who constantly make claims about drug use. Shouldn't there be a rule where you actually need some proof for making such claims?
I just think that it really takes away from any serious discussion whenever you have people who just derail the thread by making these claims without a shred of evidence to ever back it up.
Accusing players of HGH and drug use without proof
Accusing players of HGH and drug use without proof
-
Hero
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,331
- And1: 53,517
- Joined: Apr 05, 2012
- Location: Edward Gardens
-
Re: Accusing players of HGH and drug use without proof
-
ReturnofMVP3
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,886
- And1: 11,633
- Joined: Dec 14, 2011
-
Re: Accusing players of HGH and drug use without proof
I would not be apposed to this. The forums (GB in particular) often has a wade or Howard debate with no factual evidence.
moocow007 wrote:ReturnofMVP3 wrote:At least he didn't punch a fire extinguisher and is forced to miss games.
This is considered baiting. This is your only warning.
EDIT: Wait...how many warnings do you already have against your record? Wow.
Re: Accusing players of HGH and drug use without proof
-
Howard Mass
- Site Admin
- Posts: 66,558
- And1: 16,405
- Joined: Feb 20, 2001
- Location: Longwood, Florida
- Contact:
-
Re: Accusing players of HGH and drug use without proof
Hero,
If The Moderators feel that it is derailing discussion, they probably will hand out a warning to the User.
If The Moderators feel that it is derailing discussion, they probably will hand out a warning to the User.
R.I.P. Dharam Raghubir (A.K.A. Magnumt)
Return to Feedback and Suggestions