Pack @ Queens
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Pack @ Queens
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Pack @ Queens
Green Bay Packers Green Bay Packers
7 QB Brett Hundley
36 CB LaDarius Gunter
46 RB Alonzo Harris
55 LB Andy Mulumba
65 G Lane Taylor
84 WR Jared Abbrederis
88 WR Ty Montgomery
Minnesota Vikings
6 QB Taylor Heinicke
21 CB Josh Robinson
51 LB Edmond Robinson
62 C Nick Easton
72 DT Kenrick Ellis
78 T Jeremiah Sirles
94 DE Justin Trattou
Randall and Lacey are up, hopefully the week off helps Lacey.
7 QB Brett Hundley
36 CB LaDarius Gunter
46 RB Alonzo Harris
55 LB Andy Mulumba
65 G Lane Taylor
84 WR Jared Abbrederis
88 WR Ty Montgomery
Minnesota Vikings
6 QB Taylor Heinicke
21 CB Josh Robinson
51 LB Edmond Robinson
62 C Nick Easton
72 DT Kenrick Ellis
78 T Jeremiah Sirles
94 DE Justin Trattou
Randall and Lacey are up, hopefully the week off helps Lacey.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Pack @ Queens
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,685
- And1: 27,269
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Pack @ Queens
So much for Montgomery having a regular old ankle sprain.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Pack @ Queens
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Pack @ Queens
trwi7 wrote:So much for Montgomery having a regular old ankle sprain.
After the way Adams came back, can't blame them with erring on the side of caution. Also short week next week doesn't help.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Pack @ Queens
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 101,806
- And1: 54,939
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
Re: Pack @ Queens
I loathe Minnesota. At least the moron with the horn is gone
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Re: Pack @ Queens
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,778
- And1: 7,290
- Joined: Jul 13, 2005
Re: Pack @ Queens
This game already feels disgusting. In years past, I felt the Pack continually exceeded expectations when I doubted them in tough environments. This year feels like the year all my past feelings of doubt are amounting to one giant **** sandwich. Let's eat up, get Jordy back, and get a draft pick in the 13-16 range. Regardless of what happens this year, our young guys have shown a lot of potential. We absolutely need to target a TE in rounds 1-3 next year.
EDIT: In true fashion, if we somehow win this game...I'm shamelessly back on the bandwagon
EDIT: In true fashion, if we somehow win this game...I'm shamelessly back on the bandwagon

Re: Pack @ Queens
- rilamann
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,669
- And1: 15,197
- Joined: Jun 20, 2003
- Location: Damn that rilamann!!
-
Re: Pack @ Queens
Are the Packers going through a tough stretch that they can get over and still make a run at things? Or have they mentally checked out of this season?
I think this game today will tell us a lot.
I think this game today will tell us a lot.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
Re: Pack @ Queens
- Bernman
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,843
- And1: 8,361
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
-
Re: Pack @ Queens
I don't care about those inactives. Is Rodgers going to be back today, or are we getting the equipment guy from the State Farm commercials in his jersey again today?
Re: Pack @ Queens
- dedned
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,726
- And1: 1,465
- Joined: Feb 02, 2005
- Location: nowhere
-
Re: Pack @ Queens
- Wooderson
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,174
- And1: 5,902
- Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Re: Pack @ Queens
3rd and 11 and the safeties are 25 yards downfield. Brilliant.
Re: Pack @ Queens
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,361
- And1: 4,166
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Pack @ Queens
Screens and short slants. That is all you have to worry about.
Re: Pack @ Queens
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Pack @ Queens
Not pretty, but we get the ball at the 20.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Pack @ Queens
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Pack @ Queens
Is Burnett made of glass?
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Pack @ Queens
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,289
- And1: 7,935
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
Re: Pack @ Queens
BUCKnation wrote:Screens and short slants. That is all you have to worry about.
And crossing routes, but yeah everything MIN does is short and relies on clearing out space for YAC.
Re: Pack @ Queens
- Bernman
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,843
- And1: 8,361
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
-
Re: Pack @ Queens
Not really. They break one deep here and there.
Re: Pack @ Queens
- MadBlueEdwards
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,024
- And1: 1,317
- Joined: Sep 24, 2010
Re: Pack @ Queens
Is James Jones wearing a hoodie?
Re: Pack @ Queens
- Dwade03
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,984
- And1: 200
- Joined: Jul 05, 2005
- Location: Oconomowoc
-
Re: Pack @ Queens
Bad throw Aaron
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Fire Hammond
TKF wrote:Lue is a jackass
Re: Pack @ Queens
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Pack @ Queens
What is rodgers bitching about, missed Jones by a mile.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Pack @ Queens
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Pack @ Queens
Do we have more yards than last week already?
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Pack @ Queens
- Turk Nowitzki
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,351
- And1: 11,435
- Joined: Feb 26, 2010
- Location: on the Hellmouth
-
Re: Pack @ Queens
You just never see Aaron miss throws like that. I don't get what's going on with him.
Re: Pack @ Queens
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Pack @ Queens
Linsley has taken a huge step back this year
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.