So the general assumption is that him and Rockets are just fine tuning a contract and he'll be back with them still this year. Let's pretend that they can't reach an agreement and they opt for a S+T instead. (I know a team could sign him straight out but their may be an incentive to take back another teams player or two.)
I've got a few ideas, but what's everyone else think?
To Mil for Monroe or OKC along with Brewer for Kanter/Singler. Giving them a decent D'antoni big.
To Toronto for Patterson+?
I can't think of much aside from those.
D-Mo sign and trade options
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
D-Mo sign and trade options
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 11,767
- And1: 8,071
- Joined: Dec 13, 2013
-
D-Mo sign and trade options
Rest in peace Mamba. There'll never be another Kobe.
Re: D-Mo sign and trade options
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,712
- And1: 848
- Joined: Jan 03, 2016
-
Re: D-Mo sign and trade options
I think Mil would just want him on a one year deal just to dump Monroe.
Re: D-Mo sign and trade options
-
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 20,875
- And1: 7,836
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: D-Mo sign and trade options
I don't think Milwaukee would want him, but maybe a third team would want him more than Monroe? Milwaukee has money committed to two centers (Henson/Plumlee) a stretch four (Tele), minutes reserved for Parker or G at "PF", and just drafted a PF(ish) in Maker. Some of those names aren't exciting, but they are still getting paid..
And OKC.. I can't see Houston taking Kanter and getting even worse defensively. I'm not sure if Motie is much of an upgrade on that side, but he won't be making 16 mil a year either..
I don't see any sign and trades really because of his injury risk and the fact that s&t have to be three years.. Houston actual needs are bigger than Motie would return and their small need is a third big better than Nene.. Which is what they'd be trading.
And OKC.. I can't see Houston taking Kanter and getting even worse defensively. I'm not sure if Motie is much of an upgrade on that side, but he won't be making 16 mil a year either..
I don't see any sign and trades really because of his injury risk and the fact that s&t have to be three years.. Houston actual needs are bigger than Motie would return and their small need is a third big better than Nene.. Which is what they'd be trading.
Re: D-Mo sign and trade options
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,581
- And1: 2,707
- Joined: Mar 05, 2012
Re: D-Mo sign and trade options
patman52 wrote:I think Mil would just want him on a one year deal just to dump Monroe.
Can't do a 1yr sign-and-trade. Minimum requirement is a 3yr contract in a S&T, though only the 1st year needs to be guaranteed.
Re: D-Mo sign and trade options
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,138
- And1: 3,274
- Joined: May 16, 2006
-
Re: D-Mo sign and trade options
Pacers might be willing to do Lavoy Allen & a pick. But D-Mo would have to come relatively cheap (talking less than 8 mil per year) because of the risk. I've always liked his play though.
Re: D-Mo sign and trade options
- Laimbeer
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,967
- And1: 15,115
- Joined: Aug 12, 2009
- Location: Cabin Creek
-
Re: D-Mo sign and trade options
self delete
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
Return to Trades and Transactions