Choker wrote:I don't think it's his style of play that has caused his value to nearly bottom out, it's his attitude. He thinks he's still a 20ppg scorer. Imagine if Duncan refused to accept a lesser role and wanted to be the team's first option until the last game of his career, he'd be cancerous for the Spurs. Instead he was still an insanely valuable big because he did what he's still capable of doing to the best of his abilities.
Howard can still be one of the better big men in the league if he didn't think so highly of himself and focused only on playing elite defense and rebounding the hell out of the ball.
Xherdan 23 wrote:Dwight's value is in the gutter not because the NBA has no place for a big man with his skills, it's because he refuses to accept a role that fits his skill set (pick&roll man, rebounding and rim protection).
He thinks (and also says out loud) that he should be a 1st option on offense in the post. He's just not good enough for that.
Deandre Jordan/Clint Capella with a very similar skill set are still extremely valuable and even someone like Javale has a lot to offer as a hustle big.
If Dwight accepts the fact that he isn't a 20 ppg scorer anymore I'm sure a lot of teams would be happy to have him.
With all due respect, you guys don't know what you're talking about. You're buying into an old narrative. Let me provide some stats for you.
Offense, Demanding the Ball, Unwillingness to set Screens
I wasn't able to find stats for raw number of screens set, but Dwight averaged more screen assists than Turner, Jokic, Adams, Horford, Whiteside, and Marc Gasol in comparable or fewer minutes. At the same time, Dennis Schroeder finished 7th in pick and roll possessions per game. Millsap does a lot of screening for us, but Dwight is still utilized the majority of the time. Dwight sets a LOT of screens.
Regarding his supposedly incessant demand for the ball, he had a career low 8.3 FGA/game and a career high of .627 TS%,good for 8th in the league. Of those, he was assisted on a very healthy 65.7% of his makes, or 3.4 FGA/game.
He did a lot of work by getting 2.9 putbacks a game, good for 3rd in the league AHEAD OF Jordan and Gobert, and taking 2.2 FGA off those putbacks.
If you're counting that's 5.6 out of his 8.3 FGA purely from putbacks and assisted buckets.
He was also a very frequent cutter, 5th in cuts per game, ahead of Jordan and Drummond.
He did use 3.7 post up possessions a game and wasn't particularly good at it. That's said,it's fewer than guys like Whiteside and Z-Bo were using despite Dwight being more efficient in his post ups than those guys, and you don't hear anything about their demand for the ball (to say nothing of Drummond).
Rebounding and Defense
Dwight was 2nd in the league in ORB%, 4th in the league in DRB%, 4th in the league in TRB%. Heck he posted career highs in ORB% and TRB%.
Dude was a better rebounder than Gobert on a per minute/rate basis. Do you call him a bad or lazy rebounder as well?
As for defense, Dwight definitely fell off both statistically and through the eye test, but he was still approximately equivalent to Whiteside in DRPM, and comparable to Marc Gasol both in number of defended FGA as well as defended FG%
TL;DR: Dwight had a perfectly decent, scratch that, he had a GOOD year for the Hawks. He did exactly the things people said he needed to do, which was to shut up, rebound, play defense, and make easy interior buckets.
Was he perfect? No, he still bobbles the ball a lot, is visibly less athletic, should roll harder off screens rather than hanging out in no mans land, and can cut down on some of his post possessions. But FFS, most of the commentary people have is just embarrassingly wrong.
Mods, feel free to move this if needed, but I think it should stay here given all the Dwight trade talks that's emerged.




















