I know people aren't necessarily excited about him, but he's a great piece to have at the end of our bench. I didn't even realize this, but Forbes was a full season starter on the last Spurs team to make the playoffs.
The official Bryn Forbes thread
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
The official Bryn Forbes thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,705
- And1: 22,273
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
The official Bryn Forbes thread
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The official Bryn Forbes thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,705
- And1: 22,273
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The official Bryn Forbes thread
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The official Bryn Forbes thread
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,783
- And1: 2,394
- Joined: Nov 23, 2016
-
Re: The official Bryn Forbes thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,705
- And1: 22,273
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The official Bryn Forbes thread
Since he became a regular rotation guy in his second year, Bryn is a .416 shooter on 4.5 attempts per game (7.4 3s per36).
Beasley was lauded for his putting up tons of 3s, .389 on 10.6 3s per36....over the last three seasons, Forbes shot .417 on 8.7 3s per36.
Beasley was lauded for his putting up tons of 3s, .389 on 10.6 3s per36....over the last three seasons, Forbes shot .417 on 8.7 3s per36.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The official Bryn Forbes thread
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 777
- And1: 377
- Joined: Jul 09, 2017
-
Re: The official Bryn Forbes thread
Klomp wrote:Since he became a regular rotation guy in his second year, Bryn is a .416 shooter on 4.5 attempts per game (7.4 3s per36).
Beasley was lauded for his putting up tons of 3s, .389 on 10.6 3s per36....over the last three seasons, Forbes shot .417 on 8.7 3s per36.
I also feel like Forbes is better off the bounce than Beasley - that's not saying much, but it may be true. We just shouldn't be surprised that a guy who Pops, Budenholzer and Malone (three great coaches) play big minutes might actually be good at basketball.
Re: The official Bryn Forbes thread
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,157
- And1: 1,889
- Joined: Feb 25, 2014
-
Re: The official Bryn Forbes thread
Might be the most under the radar needle mover this season.
Re: The official Bryn Forbes thread
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,895
- And1: 1,069
- Joined: May 22, 2001
Re: The official Bryn Forbes thread
NebWolvesFan wrote:Klomp wrote:Since he became a regular rotation guy in his second year, Bryn is a .416 shooter on 4.5 attempts per game (7.4 3s per36).
Beasley was lauded for his putting up tons of 3s, .389 on 10.6 3s per36....over the last three seasons, Forbes shot .417 on 8.7 3s per36.
I also feel like Forbes is better off the bounce than Beasley - that's not saying much, but it may be true. We just shouldn't be surprised that a guy who Pops, Budenholzer and Malone (three great coaches) play big minutes might actually be good at basketball.
So … why didn’t those so-called great coaches keep him? Obviously has flaws

Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Re: The official Bryn Forbes thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,705
- And1: 22,273
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The official Bryn Forbes thread
Dewey wrote:NebWolvesFan wrote:Klomp wrote:Since he became a regular rotation guy in his second year, Bryn is a .416 shooter on 4.5 attempts per game (7.4 3s per36).
Beasley was lauded for his putting up tons of 3s, .389 on 10.6 3s per36....over the last three seasons, Forbes shot .417 on 8.7 3s per36.
I also feel like Forbes is better off the bounce than Beasley - that's not saying much, but it may be true. We just shouldn't be surprised that a guy who Pops, Budenholzer and Malone (three great coaches) play big minutes might actually be good at basketball.
So … why didn’t those so-called great coaches keep him? Obviously has flaws
1. Coaches aren't the GMs.
2. Just wasn't a priority.
3. Maybe they felt minimum contract shooter is easily replaceable.
Regardless, we have him now and I'm very glad we do.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The official Bryn Forbes thread
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,975
- And1: 3,011
- Joined: Jul 02, 2022
-
Re: The official Bryn Forbes thread
Klomp wrote:Dewey wrote:NebWolvesFan wrote:
I also feel like Forbes is better off the bounce than Beasley - that's not saying much, but it may be true. We just shouldn't be surprised that a guy who Pops, Budenholzer and Malone (three great coaches) play big minutes might actually be good at basketball.
So … why didn’t those so-called great coaches keep him? Obviously has flaws
1. Coaches aren't the GMs.
2. Just wasn't a priority.
3. Maybe they felt minimum contract shooter is easily replaceable.
Regardless, we have him now and I'm very glad we do.
I think he is a shorter version of Kyle Korver - effective in the right situation for limited minutes. For some teams, Kyle only worth as much as a copy machine

Re: The official Bryn Forbes thread
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 777
- And1: 377
- Joined: Jul 09, 2017
-
Re: The official Bryn Forbes thread
Dewey wrote:NebWolvesFan wrote:Klomp wrote:Since he became a regular rotation guy in his second year, Bryn is a .416 shooter on 4.5 attempts per game (7.4 3s per36).
Beasley was lauded for his putting up tons of 3s, .389 on 10.6 3s per36....over the last three seasons, Forbes shot .417 on 8.7 3s per36.
I also feel like Forbes is better off the bounce than Beasley - that's not saying much, but it may be true. We just shouldn't be surprised that a guy who Pops, Budenholzer and Malone (three great coaches) play big minutes might actually be good at basketball.
So … why didn’t those so-called great coaches keep him? Obviously has flaws
It should also be pointed out that Pops brought him back and TC signed him after trading for him. While he has never signed a long-term deal with a team, smart people like him for what he is.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves