It seems like there is a top 3 at this point: Sarr, Clingan, Risacher.
If ATL likes Risacher and can make a deal for #3, or just think either center works, then they can still get their center of the future at #3 (either Sarr or Clingan) while getting a stud forward in Risacher.
ATL:
pg - (Murray or Trae)
sg - Bogdanovic
sf - Risacher, Hunter, Griffin
pf - JaJo, Okongwu
c - (Sarr or Clingan), Capela
So, what works with base being a pg (Trae or Murray) for #3 plus.
Murray:
ATL gets #3, expiring quality veterans (Tate, Landale, JeffGreen, Adams)
HOU gets Murray, Capela
- Houston could roll with another veteran guard and see how far they could get. ATL resets and sets the table with depth and prospects.
ATL:
pg - Trae, Bufkin
sg - Bogdanovic, Tate
sf - Risacher, Hunter, Griffin
pf - JaJo, Okongwu, Jeff Green
c - (Sarr or Clingan), Adams, Landale
Trae:
ATL gets: #3, Vleet, 2026 BKN 1st, 2028 HOU 1st (protected 10, 10, 2nds).
HOU gets Trae
- Obviously the picks/prospects added to #3 and Vleet can be argued (picks above or Amen). But, this seems close to value. A #3 pick which they might value enough to pick at #1 so they essentially get two #1 picks. Plus, the 2026 BKN pick could be gold. And, Vleet is no slouch. If they are doing well next year they keep him - otherwise, he could bring something at trade deadline.
ATL:
pg - Murray, VLeet
sg - Vleet, Bogdanovic
sf - Risacher, Hunter, Griffin
pf - JaJo, Okongwu
c - (Sarr or Clingan), Capela
As a Houston fan, I want Trae. Murray would be nice but I think a Trae/Sengun pairing on offense would be really good. Especially with 3&D guys (Brooks, Whitmore, Eason, Jabari) all around them. If Houston had to add a prospect, I Amen might be the guy since his shot is not there yet (but some will call me crazy since he is so good at everything else).
Draft Scenario: #1 Risacher - and ATL gets #3 (Sarr or Clingan)
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Draft Scenario: #1 Risacher - and ATL gets #3 (Sarr or Clingan)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,642
- And1: 469
- Joined: Jun 10, 2005
Re: Draft Scenario: #1 Risacher - and ATL gets #3 (Sarr or Clingan)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,854
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: Draft Scenario: #1 Risacher - and ATL gets #3 (Sarr or Clingan)
I don't have this as my Top 3 at all. I don't think Atlanta does something like this.
Re: Draft Scenario: #1 Risacher - and ATL gets #3 (Sarr or Clingan)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,642
- And1: 469
- Joined: Jun 10, 2005
Re: Draft Scenario: #1 Risacher - and ATL gets #3 (Sarr or Clingan)
[quote="Colbinii"]I don't have this as my Top 3 at all. I don't think Atlanta does something like this.[/quote]
Seems like Risacher and Sarr have been competing for top spot for a while. Now, supposedly ATL is deciding between Risacher and Clingan so Clingan might be number one.
Sheppard and Castle are the two other guys mentioned the most for top five consideration. However, I have trouble putting either as high as #3. Sheppard is short with short arms and I am not so impressed with his defense - even though he has a great shot - I see him becoming a great 6th man. Castle's shot is my issue with him. Really picks #3-#13 all have pluses and minuses.
I would rather see Clingan in Houston than Sheppard or Castle (but would prefer Risacher or Sarr over Clingan).
Seems like Risacher and Sarr have been competing for top spot for a while. Now, supposedly ATL is deciding between Risacher and Clingan so Clingan might be number one.
Sheppard and Castle are the two other guys mentioned the most for top five consideration. However, I have trouble putting either as high as #3. Sheppard is short with short arms and I am not so impressed with his defense - even though he has a great shot - I see him becoming a great 6th man. Castle's shot is my issue with him. Really picks #3-#13 all have pluses and minuses.
I would rather see Clingan in Houston than Sheppard or Castle (but would prefer Risacher or Sarr over Clingan).
Return to Trades and Transactions