Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,868
And1: 7,831
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#1 » by jayjaysee » Sat Jul 6, 2024 4:39 pm

Yeah. Just random bad idea time since everything major seems to be waiting on Ainge..

Atlanta: Thybulle and Williams

Atlanta brings in two potentially great fits with Trae and stay under the tax. Trust in Jalen being the second option. Timelord health issues are clear, but with Okongwu and Nance, they can take the risk. They can still offer 4 firsts and other value if they want to actually bring in a star and they don’t trade their high variance picks here, this is just about making an elite defense around Trae.

Portland: Capela, 2025 Sac first, two 2nds

Portland gets an expiring, a first and seconds for two of their young vets. Probably the last two the team wants to trade, but they should still trade Grant, Simons and Ayton after this..
psman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,835
And1: 5,900
Joined: Feb 12, 2016
 

Re: Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#2 » by psman2 » Sat Jul 6, 2024 4:52 pm

Don't see it at all. Atlanta adds salary and uses a 1st for players that likely won't be big parts of their rotation. With Dyson Daniels in Atlanta I don't see the appeal of Thybulle.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,569
And1: 13,920
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#3 » by JRoy » Sat Jul 6, 2024 5:01 pm

psman2 wrote:Don't see it at all. Atlanta adds salary and uses a 1st for players that likely won't be big parts of their rotation. With Dyson Daniels in Atlanta I don't see the appeal of Thybulle.


Zany Aussie off court hijinx?
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,598
And1: 6,242
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#4 » by gswhoops » Sat Jul 6, 2024 5:01 pm

I like the idea for ATL but I don’t think a first is warranted here
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,868
And1: 7,831
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#5 » by jayjaysee » Sat Jul 6, 2024 5:03 pm

psman2 wrote:Don't see it at all. Atlanta adds salary and uses a 1st for players that likely won't be big parts of their rotation. With Dyson Daniels in Atlanta I don't see the appeal of Thybulle.


I guess we just really disagree here.

Even only 20 minutes per game from each of Thybulle and Timelord transforms a defense, has such an impact on wins..

The extra salary isn’t enough to bring Atlanta over the tax this season. Next year, Thybulle will be opting out if he repeats last season and Williams will be very underpaid if he finishes this season healthy. I know he doesn’t really finish seasons healthy, but that’s why he’s available for this type of offer.

But maybe I’m too high on the guys involved. Don’t think the Sac first is much value though.
psman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,835
And1: 5,900
Joined: Feb 12, 2016
 

Re: Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#6 » by psman2 » Sat Jul 6, 2024 5:24 pm

jayjaysee wrote:
psman2 wrote:Don't see it at all. Atlanta adds salary and uses a 1st for players that likely won't be big parts of their rotation. With Dyson Daniels in Atlanta I don't see the appeal of Thybulle.


I guess we just really disagree here.

Even only 20 minutes per game from each of Thybulle and Timelord transforms a defense, has such an impact on wins..

The extra salary isn’t enough to bring Atlanta over the tax this season. Next year, Thybulle will be opting out if he repeats last season and Williams will be very underpaid if he finishes this season healthy. I know he doesn’t really finish seasons healthy, but that’s why he’s available for this type of offer.

But maybe I’m too high on the guys involved. Don’t think the Sac first is much value though.


Or more likely Thybulle stays around a 15 minute guy on a decent team playing behind DD/Risacher/Hunter/Bogs/Bufkin and Timelord misses most of the season. I don't think any team would offer expirings and a 1st for that package and Capela is still the best player in this trade. I think the Sac pick has a good chance to falling in the 13-18 range.
Village Idiot
General Manager
Posts: 9,487
And1: 2,191
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
   

Re: Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#7 » by Village Idiot » Sat Jul 6, 2024 5:35 pm

Portland wouldn't consider it without the first FWIW.
"There are no right answers to wrong questions." - Ursula K. Le Guin
tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,546
And1: 1,258
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#8 » by tester551 » Sat Jul 6, 2024 5:37 pm

From a roster fit standpoint, I think Hunter instead of Capella works better.

Thybulle + RW3 <=> Hunter + asset?
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,569
And1: 13,920
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#9 » by JRoy » Sat Jul 6, 2024 5:39 pm

jayjaysee wrote:
psman2 wrote:Don't see it at all. Atlanta adds salary and uses a 1st for players that likely won't be big parts of their rotation. With Dyson Daniels in Atlanta I don't see the appeal of Thybulle.


I guess we just really disagree here.

Even only 20 minutes per game from each of Thybulle and Timelord transforms a defense, has such an impact on wins..

The extra salary isn’t enough to bring Atlanta over the tax this season. Next year, Thybulle will be opting out if he repeats last season and Williams will be very underpaid if he finishes this season healthy. I know he doesn’t really finish seasons healthy, but that’s why he’s available for this type of offer.

But maybe I’m too high on the guys involved. Don’t think the Sac first is much value though.


RW3 availability is a huge drag on his value.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 21,968
And1: 13,894
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#10 » by Godaddycurse » Sat Jul 6, 2024 5:39 pm

jayjaysee wrote:Don’t think the Sac first is much value though.


why not? in that stacked west that sac first had a good shot of being a mid 1st
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,868
And1: 7,831
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#11 » by jayjaysee » Sat Jul 6, 2024 5:40 pm

Godaddycurse wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:Don’t think the Sac first is much value though.


why not? in that stacked west that sac first had a good shot of being a mid 1st


I think the 2025 draft is being thought of so favorably because of 3-5 guys. Not the guys at 14-18.

The Sac first is a first. So it is valuable. But it also is protected well enough that it’ll never be a great asset.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,868
And1: 7,831
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#12 » by jayjaysee » Sat Jul 6, 2024 5:41 pm

JRoy wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:
psman2 wrote:Don't see it at all. Atlanta adds salary and uses a 1st for players that likely won't be big parts of their rotation. With Dyson Daniels in Atlanta I don't see the appeal of Thybulle.


I guess we just really disagree here.

Even only 20 minutes per game from each of Thybulle and Timelord transforms a defense, has such an impact on wins..

The extra salary isn’t enough to bring Atlanta over the tax this season. Next year, Thybulle will be opting out if he repeats last season and Williams will be very underpaid if he finishes this season healthy. I know he doesn’t really finish seasons healthy, but that’s why he’s available for this type of offer.

But maybe I’m too high on the guys involved. Don’t think the Sac first is much value though.


RW3 availability is a huge drag on his value.


Yeah, we agree.

Just think a well protected first to add two top 8-9 rotation pieces that fit with your star is a fair price.

But I’m clearly off here.
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 21,968
And1: 13,894
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#13 » by Godaddycurse » Sat Jul 6, 2024 5:52 pm

jayjaysee wrote:
Just think a well protected first to add two top 8-9 rotation pieces that fit with your star is a fair price.



i think thats true for teams in contention, which clearly isn't Atlanta, esp when they are already at a pick deficit to begin with
dms269
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 8,745
And1: 1,727
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
     

Re: Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#14 » by dms269 » Sat Jul 6, 2024 5:55 pm

jayjaysee wrote:
JRoy wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:
I guess we just really disagree here.

Even only 20 minutes per game from each of Thybulle and Timelord transforms a defense, has such an impact on wins..

The extra salary isn’t enough to bring Atlanta over the tax this season. Next year, Thybulle will be opting out if he repeats last season and Williams will be very underpaid if he finishes this season healthy. I know he doesn’t really finish seasons healthy, but that’s why he’s available for this type of offer.

But maybe I’m too high on the guys involved. Don’t think the Sac first is much value though.


RW3 availability is a huge drag on his value.


Yeah, we agree.

Just think a well protected first to add two top 8-9 rotation pieces that fit with your star is a fair price.

But I’m clearly off here.
Are they top 8 or 9 rotational pieces though? Would thybulle get playing time over daniels, bogi, Zac, and Hunter?

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app
The moderator formerly known as uga_dawgs24
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,397
And1: 98,261
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#15 » by Texas Chuck » Sat Jul 6, 2024 5:57 pm

How good is Atlanta? If they believe they are a playoff team I don't mind this though don't think the 2nds are needed. Portland should be grateful to get any kind of first for those specific players and Atlanta is far from deep in good players. I see that posted a lot that people think a team is deep because they have a lot of players, but every team has a lot of players lol. And we see in the playoffs every year how thin every team is. I mean even the champs were 8 deep that got down to 7 when KP was hurt. Sure they played other centers, but they didn't want to and Pritchard was kinda an end of quarter specialist.

Dallas looked deep in the RS and then Exum and Hardaway offered next to nothing in the playoffs and suddenly Jaden Hardy is having to play....

Now if Atlanta thinks they aren't good then sure don't bother.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,868
And1: 7,831
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#16 » by jayjaysee » Sat Jul 6, 2024 6:09 pm

dms269 wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:
JRoy wrote:
RW3 availability is a huge drag on his value.


Yeah, we agree.

Just think a well protected first to add two top 8-9 rotation pieces that fit with your star is a fair price.

But I’m clearly off here.
Are they top 8 or 9 rotational pieces though? Would thybulle get playing time over daniels, bogi, Zac, and Hunter?

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app


Yes they are (IMO)

Because Dyson nor Zac are guarantees to walk in ready to play 30mpg next season. Nor is a guarantee that Dyson can actually be the lead defender next to Trae? He’s been paired with a couple other really great wing defenders...

Where as Thybulle finally hit threes enough that you aren’t playing 4 on 5 (well now it’s like 4.5 on 5) and you know if you put him next to Trae he’ll guard whoever.

That’s why I think Atlanta should want the depth.

If it works out that Thybulle plays 10mpg and you are flipping him 25 games into the season, that’s great news for Atlanta.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,868
And1: 7,831
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#17 » by jayjaysee » Sat Jul 6, 2024 6:15 pm

Godaddycurse wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:
Just think a well protected first to add two top 8-9 rotation pieces that fit with your star is a fair price.



i think thats true for teams in contention, which clearly isn't Atlanta, esp when they are already at a pick deficit to begin with


Yeah, it would be a lot less fun here if only “teams in contention” traded picks.

Atlanta finished 500 last year and won 36 games this year. With a poor fitting roster around their star. They didn’t draft first because of how terrible they are..

And while they don’t own their own firsts, they are actually plus one in total picks. Owe 2, own 3..
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,822
And1: 35,910
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Random bad idea: Thybulle and Timelord to Atlanta 

Post#18 » by jbk1234 » Sat Jul 6, 2024 6:16 pm

I really struggle with Timelord as having anything other than negative value. I think Thybulle gets the package to nuetral.

If the Hawks are attaching a first to Capela, they should be on the phone with the Knicks and inquiring about Hart or DDV.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.

Return to Trades and Transactions