DET
In: McCollum, one decent future 2nd from OKC
Out: Hardaway, Fontecchio
Why: They get better, in exchange for sacrificing much of next year's cap space. Worth it, for Pistons fans?
NO:
In: Hardaway, Fontecchio, Dieng
Out: McCollum, Alvarado
Why: They get under the tax this year, go for a better lottery pick, and save $20MM next year, plus get a last look at Dieng to see if he's worth anything; Alvarado seems a reasonable price to pay for all of that. Do Pelicans fans agree?
OKC:
In: Alvarado
Out: Dieng, decent future 2nd to Detroit
Why: With Mitchell out, they need a PG for the non-SGA minutes; Alvarado is cheap, shoots reasonably well, and fits perfectly on defense. And the price is low (too low? is OKC stealing value from somebody here?) But can he really run an offense, even for 12-14 minutes a game?
DET - NO - OKC
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
DET - NO - OKC
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,421
- And1: 58
- Joined: Oct 07, 2006
Re: DET - NO - OKC
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 10,521
- And1: 6,859
- Joined: Jun 23, 2015
- Contact:
-
Re: DET - NO - OKC
sterncohen wrote:DET
In: McCollum, one decent future 2nd from OKC
Out: Hardaway, Fontecchio
Why: They get better, in exchange for sacrificing much of next year's cap space. Worth it, for Pistons fans?
NO:
In: Hardaway, Fontecchio, Dieng
Out: McCollum, Alvarado
Why: They get under the tax this year, go for a better lottery pick, and save $20MM next year, plus get a last look at Dieng to see if he's worth anything; Alvarado seems a reasonable price to pay for all of that. Do Pelicans fans agree?
OKC:
In: Alvarado
Out: Dieng, decent future 2nd to Detroit
Why: With Mitchell out, they need a PG for the non-SGA minutes; Alvarado is cheap, shoots reasonably well, and fits perfectly on defense. And the price is low (too low? is OKC stealing value from somebody here?) But can he really run an offense, even for 12-14 minutes a game?
I don't know much about Alvarado but I'm fine with this from an OKC perspective assuming he's at least capable of running an offense. I don't have a good read on value for most of these guys. DET, NO folks, any thoughts?
Re: DET - NO - OKC
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 3,553
- And1: 3,757
- Joined: May 01, 2020
- Location: in the music studio
-
Re: DET - NO - OKC
I feel good about these targets and value, but that probably means I'm wrong.
One question here is about Fontecchio, he's done well for DET, but this could be a veteran move that honestly benefits the Pistons, they're in the PO chase now.
One question here is about Fontecchio, he's done well for DET, but this could be a veteran move that honestly benefits the Pistons, they're in the PO chase now.
Cheers
\m/

\m/

Re: DET - NO - OKC
-
- Junior
- Posts: 402
- And1: 140
- Joined: Apr 26, 2024
Re: DET - NO - OKC
The CJ to DET idea makes so much sense, hope it happens. Don't see the OKC part, though. Alvarado is a fan favorite and pretty effective with advanced stats. They extended him and see him as a culture setter for next season.
Re: DET - NO - OKC
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,323
- And1: 2,289
- Joined: Nov 23, 2018
-
Re: DET - NO - OKC
I feel like trading for CJ probably costs us Beasley in the offseason and I’m not sure that tradeoff makes sense
Re: DET - NO - OKC
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,889
- And1: 4,125
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Re: DET - NO - OKC
Way too good for the Pels. They cant possibly turn CJ into an expiring, a solid player on a reasonable deal,a nd an OKC prospect
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Return to Trades and Transactions