Anthony Edwards Defends Lack Of Shots In Narrow Game 4 Loss To Thunder

Moderators: bwgood77, Domejandro

RealGM Wiretap
RealGM
Posts: 114,456
And1: 313
Joined: Mar 19, 2013

Anthony Edwards Defends Lack Of Shots In Narrow Game 4 Loss To Thunder 

Post#1 » by RealGM Wiretap » Tue May 27, 2025 2:29 pm

The Minnesota Timberwolves kept Game 4 close, but ultimately lost 128-126 to the Oklahoma City Thunder to fall down 3-1 in the Western Conference Finals. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Jalen Williams had 40 points and 34 points, respectively, while Anthony Edwards and Julius Randle had 16 points and five points. Edwards was limited to just 13 field goal attempts after he excelled in Game 3 with a more aggressive approach. 


"I don't look at it like I struggled, or [Randle] struggled," Edwards said. "They just, they had a good game plan, making us get off the ball. Especially for me, man. They were super in the gaps, I made the right play all night."


The Thunder have successfully limited Edwards' ability to score as he's averaging just 17.3 shots per game compared to 19.8 in the second round against the Golden State Warriors and 22.4 in the first round against the Los Angeles Lakers.


"It's an urge that I want to get the ball in the rim, put it up there," Edwards said. "But you don't want to take bad shots and get your team out of rhythm. So I was just playing the game the right way, man."


"I thought second half he was more aggressive," Chris Finch said. "He got downhill. We got him off the ball a little bit more. When he got to the paint, I thought he found some people, made the right plays. First half, he lagged behind a little bit too much. He needed to get out in front so we could stretch the floor and screen for him a bit. But second half was much better."

Via Dave McMenamin/ESPN

TheCage4
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,484
And1: 637
Joined: Aug 22, 2001
Location: NY
       

Re: Anthony Edwards Defends Lack Of Shots In Narrow Game 4 Loss To Thunder 

Post#2 » by TheCage4 » Tue May 27, 2025 3:47 pm

The NBA wants Ant so much to be HIM, but he simply is not. Super talented, no question, but he doesn't have "it."
“And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission.” -V
CaHgO
Sophomore
Posts: 146
And1: 11
Joined: Jan 25, 2024
     

Re: Anthony Edwards Defends Lack Of Shots In Narrow Game 4 Loss To Thunder 

Post#3 » by CaHgO » Tue May 27, 2025 5:08 pm

He's not there yet. Not even close. The talent is abundant, but what holds him back is his immaturity. I don't know him and I don't want it to sound as an insult, but (based on his off-the-court demeanor, interviews, Starting 5 series, etc.) he just seems not intelligent enough. He's an athlete, so I am not saying he should be a PhD or something, but all of the best ever (Jordan, LeBron, Kobe, Bird, Magic, etc.) all had really high intelligence and emotional intelligence. At this stage in his career Ant has none of those.
Cassius
RealGM
Posts: 16,103
And1: 4,372
Joined: Aug 19, 2005
Location: We won.
     

Re: Anthony Edwards Defends Lack Of Shots In Narrow Game 4 Loss To Thunder 

Post#4 » by Cassius » Tue May 27, 2025 9:58 pm

Ant is fine. How many ECF did Tatum and Brown have to lose before they got to the Finals? He and Jaden are going to win a lot of games for a long time.
I_Like_Dirt wrote:The whole comparison to Kevin McHale is ridiculously close, imo... And that's without more hilarious aspects of the comparison, e.g. if Wally Sczerbiak were 7 feet tall with the slower reflexes that came with the additional height, he'd be Bargnani.
Indomitable
RealGM
Posts: 25,243
And1: 6,336
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: Yelzenbah!
     

Re: Anthony Edwards Defends Lack Of Shots In Narrow Game 4 Loss To Thunder 

Post#5 » by Indomitable » Wed May 28, 2025 1:11 am

You have to go down with guns blazing
:banghead:
Pickled Prunes
General Manager
Posts: 8,786
And1: 1,383
Joined: Sep 14, 2010

Re: Anthony Edwards Defends Lack Of Shots In Narrow Game 4 Loss To Thunder 

Post#6 » by Pickled Prunes » Wed May 28, 2025 1:52 am

TheCage4 wrote:The NBA wants Ant so much to be HIM, but he simply is not. Super talented, no question, but he doesn't have "it."

I don't think the NBA cares. Ant is marketable so they market him. When he's no longer marketable they will market someone else. But realistically, OKC is the NBA's best defense and MIN only has one player they need to stop... one and a half if you count Randle.
Darthlukey
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 5,205
And1: 3,642
Joined: Jan 16, 2013
         

Re: Anthony Edwards Defends Lack Of Shots In Narrow Game 4 Loss To Thunder 

Post#7 » by Darthlukey » Wed May 28, 2025 11:36 am

TheCage4 wrote:The NBA wants Ant so much to be HIM, but he simply is not. Super talented, no question, but he doesn't have "it."

It kinda feels like the free throws and the MVP vote is the nba wanting sga to be that guy.
Pickled Prunes
General Manager
Posts: 8,786
And1: 1,383
Joined: Sep 14, 2010

Re: Anthony Edwards Defends Lack Of Shots In Narrow Game 4 Loss To Thunder 

Post#8 » by Pickled Prunes » Wed May 28, 2025 6:30 pm

Darthlukey wrote:
TheCage4 wrote:The NBA wants Ant so much to be HIM, but he simply is not. Super talented, no question, but he doesn't have "it."

It kinda feels like the free throws and the MVP vote is the nba wanting sga to be that guy.

Well, "the NBA" didn't vote for MVP and Brunson is getting that same whistle.

Interestingly, Randle has been nullified because he is getting the Shaq treatment. If Randle uses his strength and drops a shoulder it is an offensive foul, if SGA or Brunson drop their shoulder and initiate contact it's a defensive foul. These playoffs have become an officiating travesty. I'm not mad because don't have a vested interest, and I think ultimately the better team is winning.... but the games are getting hard to watch.

Return to Wiretap Discussion