GSW/SAC/BOS/CHI/MIN/BRK

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,471
And1: 14,206
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

GSW/SAC/BOS/CHI/MIN/BRK 

Post#1 » by HornetJail » Sat Aug 9, 2025 10:50 pm

Warriors trade Kuminga S&T, Jackson-Davis, Santos
Warriors receive Hauser, DDV

Kings trade Monk, Devin Carter, Saric, 2026 and 2027 CHA 2nds
Kings receive Kuminga S&T

Celtics trade Simons, Hauser, two 2026 2nds*
Celtics receive Saric (cut and stretched), Vucevic

Bulls trade Vucevic, Jevon Carter
Bulls receive Simons, Devin Carter, TJD 2027 CHA 2nd

Wolves trade DDV, Conley
Wolves receive Monk

Nets trade cap space
Nets receive Jevon Carter, Santos, Conley, three 2026 2nds

* Kuminga signs for roughly $27-33M a year. Didn't do the exact math but it should be in the ballpark of $30M to work with BYC rules.
* Celtics currently own two 2026 2nds. 2026 second round draft pick from Orlando, Detroit or Milwaukee (most favorable) and 2026 second round draft pick from Minnesota, New York, New Orleans or Portland (most favorable). They send both of these picks to BRK.

- Warriors get two rotation contributors out of Kuminga and a couple of fringe prospects. Assuming the rumors of Horford and Melton are true, they have a rotation of Curry/DDV/Hield/Butler/Dray+Melton/Moody/Hauser/Horford/Post
- Kings get their wish of Kuminga without sending a 1st. LaVine/DDR/Murray/Kuminga/Sabonis + Schroeder/Ellis/[Clifford/Jones/Raynaud? i have no idea]
- Boston gets all the way under the tax and stops their center rotation from being a crippling liability. Pritchard/White/Brown/Boucher/Vuc + who knows
- Chicago takes a flyer on a first round pick from last year at the cost of some salary being eaten and the downgrade from Vuc to Simons.
- Minnesota adds an explosive 6th man scoring in Monk, who can also playmake a bit. He starts and closes but plays most of the minutes with the bench. Ant/Monk/Jaden/Randle/Gobert + Dillingham/Shannon/Clark/Naz
- Brooklyn utilizes all their remaining cap space to stockpile a few more picks, CHA and NOP 2nds should both be in the 30s and Conley can probably be flipped to a contender.

yeah this got out of hand
investigate Adam Silver
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,647
And1: 6,310
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: GSW/SAC/BOS/CHI/MIN/BRK 

Post#2 » by gswhoops » Sat Aug 9, 2025 11:34 pm

Feels like we come out way ahead in this one, but I'm not complaining :D
OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,697
And1: 1,365
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: GSW/SAC/BOS/CHI/MIN/BRK 

Post#3 » by OGSactownballer » Sun Aug 10, 2025 12:16 am

It’s a lot but believe it or not it’s actually balanced and meets the (alleged) needs of all the teams involved.

Bravo on a multi team masterpiece!
ChuckDurn
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,961
And1: 819
Joined: May 13, 2011

Re: GSW/SAC/BOS/CHI/MIN/BRK 

Post#4 » by ChuckDurn » Sun Aug 10, 2025 2:32 am

I think it’s a financial problem for the Warriors, who are taking back $22M in salary in Hauser and DDV (plus they’re trying to keep all contracted for only 2 years, where Hauser’s runs for 4, but I doubt that’s a big problem). Not sure they can take back that much with Kuminga’s BYC status, without triggering aprons which would prevent some of the FA signings.

I wouldn’t mind the deal on a talent / fit level for the Warriors, but not sure it works financially. If it did, the Warriors would have a sickly scary 3-point shooting team (aside from Draymond and Butler, of course…..)

One note is that the Warriors would still have Podziemski (not listed in the rotation), and I doubt the line-up would be as listed, but that’s not material to the trade.
If I don't have anything funny to say, can I still have a signature?
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,216
And1: 13,036
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: GSW/SAC/BOS/CHI/MIN/BRK 

Post#5 » by brackdan70 » Sun Aug 10, 2025 2:38 am

I don’t like it for Boston. Yeah saves some money but at the cost of 2 seconds and Hauser I don’t think it’s worth it. The Celtics are better off giving PT to Queta to develop him for when Tatum is healthy.
No need or desire for Vuc. Especially at that cost.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,369
And1: 4,274
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: GSW/SAC/BOS/CHI/MIN/BRK 

Post#6 » by pipfan » Sun Aug 10, 2025 6:58 am

Seems like my Bulls are doing too well here-probably have to send out the Port pick to get DCarter
Mavrelous
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Posts: 19,657
And1: 17,478
Joined: Aug 20, 2020

Re: GSW/SAC/BOS/CHI/MIN/BRK 

Post#7 » by Mavrelous » Sun Aug 10, 2025 7:22 am

Ws and Kings say yes instantly IMO.
Celtics will insist on someone taking Saric, which should be workable.
Bulls and Wolves say yes IMO
Nets will say no I think, I'd route 2 2nds to the Bulls, and POR 1st to the Nets, or replace the Nets with the Wizards, who have exception to facilitate such deal.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
jscott
Veteran
Posts: 2,967
And1: 1,226
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
 

Re: GSW/SAC/BOS/CHI/MIN/BRK 

Post#8 » by jscott » Sun Aug 10, 2025 8:29 am

Mavrelous wrote:Ws and Kings say yes instantly IMO.
Celtics will insist on someone taking Saric, which should be workable.
Bulls and Wolves say yes IMO
Nets will say no I think, I'd route 2 2nds to the Bulls, and POR 1st to the Nets, or replace the Nets with the Wizards, who have exception to facilitate such deal.

IMO - I wouldn’t trade DDV for Monk. Also, Conley basically has a gentleman’s NTC with the Wolves front office.
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,912
And1: 1,577
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

Re: GSW/SAC/BOS/CHI/MIN/BRK 

Post#9 » by ecuhus1981 » Sun Aug 10, 2025 1:41 pm

Brooklyn is Boromir here, and says no
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
ChettheJet
General Manager
Posts: 7,994
And1: 2,373
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
       

Re: GSW/SAC/BOS/CHI/MIN/BRK 

Post#10 » by ChettheJet » Sun Aug 10, 2025 2:26 pm

The Bulls are in as soon as you explain a few things

how does this guard rotation make sense

Giddey Jones Dosunmu D Carter
White Simons Huerter

Maybe you do some half brained rationalization that Giddey starts at the SF and Dosunmu starts at PG, the problem with that is the Bulls just traded for Okoro to plat the SF, Patrick Williams no matter how many people think he sux is signed for the long term so they might as well play him. You send the Bulls Jackson-Davis who from the stats looks like he could possibly develop and contribute off the bench


But no you go ahead thinking they want to get rid of Vucevic and J Carter that bad to end up with only 2 part time centers
NW
Analyst
Posts: 3,034
And1: 617
Joined: Jul 22, 2004
Location: Warriorsworld
   

Re: GSW/SAC/BOS/CHI/MIN/BRK 

Post#11 » by NW » Sun Aug 10, 2025 3:11 pm

Like it from the Warriors perspective. Don't understand it from the Wolves giving up DDV and screwing Conley just for Monk
xdrta+
RealGM
Posts: 10,811
And1: 7,901
Joined: Jun 18, 2018
 

Re: GSW/SAC/BOS/CHI/MIN/BRK 

Post#12 » by xdrta+ » Sun Aug 10, 2025 5:38 pm

ChuckDurn wrote:I think it’s a financial problem for the Warriors, who are taking back $22M in salary in Hauser and DDV (plus they’re trying to keep all contracted for only 2 years, where Hauser’s runs for 4, but I doubt that’s a big problem). Not sure they can take back that much with Kuminga’s BYC status, without triggering aprons which would prevent some of the FA signings.

I wouldn’t mind the deal on a talent / fit level for the Warriors, but not sure it works financially. If it did, the Warriors would have a sickly scary 3-point shooting team (aside from Draymond and Butler, of course…..)

One note is that the Warriors would still have Podziemski (not listed in the rotation), and I doubt the line-up would be as listed, but that’s not material to the trade.


You're right that the Warriors need to send out more salary, they can't afford to be hard-capped at the 1st. Maybe Podz.
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,103
And1: 4,585
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: GSW/SAC/BOS/CHI/MIN/BRK 

Post#13 » by wolves_89 » Sun Aug 10, 2025 9:03 pm

I don't see the Wolves having much interest in a DDV for Monk trade. I see them as a fairly similar caliber of player, with the biggest difference being Monk making quite a bit more and having an extra year on his contract.

Return to Trades and Transactions