Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
Moderator: JaysRule15
Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,614
- And1: 10,319
- Joined: Feb 02, 2007
-
Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
Our series of tough games continues this week. Cubs have been middling a bit.. 10-10 since the All-Star Break
August 12th - TBD (Horton?) vs Berrios
August 13th - TBD (Taillon?) vs Gausman
August 14th - TBD (Boyd?) vs Scherzer
Cubs biggest issue is their starting pitching depth which they did not address at the deadline.
But looks like we will get 2 of their best 3 pitchers.
August 12th - TBD (Horton?) vs Berrios
August 13th - TBD (Taillon?) vs Gausman
August 14th - TBD (Boyd?) vs Scherzer
Cubs biggest issue is their starting pitching depth which they did not address at the deadline.
But looks like we will get 2 of their best 3 pitchers.
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (68-51) (August 12th-August 14th)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,904
- And1: 70,932
- Joined: Oct 22, 2003
-
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (68-51) (August 12th-August 14th)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,614
- And1: 10,319
- Joined: Feb 02, 2007
-
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (68-51) (August 12th-August 14th)
Something to discuss as we wait for the games on Tuesday
I was looking at the players that would be arbitration eligible in the offseason.
- Varsho and Clement are no brainers.
- I assume we offer it to Heineman (he probably jumps from league minimum to somewhere between $2-$2.5M)
- Sandlin is making $2.5M this year... we have to offer him at least that in arbitration and I think we will.
- And then we have Alek Manoah. Jays are paying him 2.2 million this year, so his arbitration number would have to at least be that. Do we cut bait or still pay him
Finally - I am having a hard time finding the exact MLB service time of Eric Lauer. Will it be under 6 years by the end of this year. It would be great if we could keep on a 1 year deal via arbitration rather than trying to retain him as a free agent.
I was looking at the players that would be arbitration eligible in the offseason.
- Varsho and Clement are no brainers.
- I assume we offer it to Heineman (he probably jumps from league minimum to somewhere between $2-$2.5M)
- Sandlin is making $2.5M this year... we have to offer him at least that in arbitration and I think we will.
- And then we have Alek Manoah. Jays are paying him 2.2 million this year, so his arbitration number would have to at least be that. Do we cut bait or still pay him
Finally - I am having a hard time finding the exact MLB service time of Eric Lauer. Will it be under 6 years by the end of this year. It would be great if we could keep on a 1 year deal via arbitration rather than trying to retain him as a free agent.
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (68-51) (August 12th-August 14th)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,614
- And1: 10,319
- Joined: Feb 02, 2007
-
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (68-51) (August 12th-August 14th)
vaff87 wrote:Jays are 69-50.
Correct, I was looking at things earlier when I assumed we would lose today.
Still amazed we pulled that one out in the end,
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (68-51) (August 12th-August 14th)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,021
- And1: 21,158
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (68-51) (August 12th-August 14th)
JN wrote:Something to discuss as we wait for the games on Tuesday
I was looking at the players that would be arbitration eligible in the offseason.
- Varsho and Clement are no brainers.
- I assume we offer it to Heineman (he probably jumps from league minimum to somewhere between $2-$2.5M)
- Sandlin is making $2.5M this year... we have to offer him at least that in arbitration and I think we will.
- And then we have Alek Manoah. Jays are paying him 2.2 million this year, so his arbitration number would have to at least be that. Do we cut bait or still pay him
Finally - I am having a hard time finding the exact MLB service time of Eric Lauer. Will it be under 6 years by the end of this year. It would be great if we could keep on a 1 year deal via arbitration rather than trying to retain him as a free agent.
Lauer is under control next year
And they’ll make offers on all those guys
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (68-51) (August 12th-August 14th)
- Parataxis
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,424
- And1: 5,735
- Joined: Jan 31, 2010
- Location: Penticton, BC
-
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (68-51) (August 12th-August 14th)
vaff87 wrote:Jays are 69-50.
Nice.
This is the grinder part of the schedule. Jays need to hold their own (and absolutely can) and come out the other side swinging.
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
- JaysRule15
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 24,216
- And1: 120,582
- Joined: Dec 26, 2011
- Location: Malvern Crew
-
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
Thank God the Red Sox lost a couple games. Hopefully they cool off now. Yankees fading as well. Will be nice to get through this brutal stretch with a 3 game lead on the division. Those series in September against the Rays and Orioles really scare me man. Both of those teams are trash against everyone except us.

Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (68-51) (August 12th-August 14th)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,669
- And1: 1,935
- Joined: Nov 12, 2008
-
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (68-51) (August 12th-August 14th)
JN wrote:Something to discuss as we wait for the games on Tuesday
I was looking at the players that would be arbitration eligible in the offseason.
- Varsho and Clement are no brainers.
- I assume we offer it to Heineman (he probably jumps from league minimum to somewhere between $2-$2.5M)
- Sandlin is making $2.5M this year... we have to offer him at least that in arbitration and I think we will.
- And then we have Alek Manoah. Jays are paying him 2.2 million this year, so his arbitration number would have to at least be that. Do we cut bait or still pay him
Finally - I am having a hard time finding the exact MLB service time of Eric Lauer. Will it be under 6 years by the end of this year. It would be great if we could keep on a 1 year deal via arbitration rather than trying to retain him as a free agent.
No question you make an offer to all those players, including Manoah. He’s still got upside and should compete for a starting spot
Hopefully they try and negotiate a 2-year/$10M type deal with Lauer -relatively low risk move
Varsho I think will be a trade candidate this offseason. Unlikely Jays will pay him $100M+ at age 31, especially if they re-sign Bo this offseason
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
- Madvillainy2004
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,017
- And1: 7,807
- Joined: Jul 03, 2019
-
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
Cubs have been very good but the past 40 games they are only 26-24. At home this is definitely a winnable series, hopefully Springer can comeback we miss him immensely. Im pretty worried about the long ball tho Cubs top 5 in homeruns.
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (68-51) (August 12th-August 14th)
- bluerap23
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,060
- And1: 7,227
- Joined: Aug 15, 2012
-
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (68-51) (August 12th-August 14th)
JN wrote:Something to discuss as we wait for the games on Tuesday
I was looking at the players that would be arbitration eligible in the offseason.
- Varsho and Clement are no brainers.
- I assume we offer it to Heineman (he probably jumps from league minimum to somewhere between $2-$2.5M)
- Sandlin is making $2.5M this year... we have to offer him at least that in arbitration and I think we will.
- And then we have Alek Manoah. Jays are paying him 2.2 million this year, so his arbitration number would have to at least be that. Do we cut bait or still pay him
Finally - I am having a hard time finding the exact MLB service time of Eric Lauer. Will it be under 6 years by the end of this year. It would be great if we could keep on a 1 year deal via arbitration rather than trying to retain him as a free agent.
I'd keep Manoah for one more year at that price. I still believe.
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
- Parataxis
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,424
- And1: 5,735
- Joined: Jan 31, 2010
- Location: Penticton, BC
-
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
Madvillainy2004 wrote:Cubs have been very good but the past 40 games they are only 26-24. At home this is definitely a winnable series, hopefully Springer can comeback we miss him immensely. Im pretty worried about the long ball tho Cubs top 5 in homeruns.
Having 50 results over their past 40 games is a record that I don't think will EVER be broken.

Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (68-51) (August 12th-August 14th)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,021
- And1: 21,158
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (68-51) (August 12th-August 14th)
COY0607 wrote:JN wrote:Something to discuss as we wait for the games on Tuesday
I was looking at the players that would be arbitration eligible in the offseason.
- Varsho and Clement are no brainers.
- I assume we offer it to Heineman (he probably jumps from league minimum to somewhere between $2-$2.5M)
- Sandlin is making $2.5M this year... we have to offer him at least that in arbitration and I think we will.
- And then we have Alek Manoah. Jays are paying him 2.2 million this year, so his arbitration number would have to at least be that. Do we cut bait or still pay him
Finally - I am having a hard time finding the exact MLB service time of Eric Lauer. Will it be under 6 years by the end of this year. It would be great if we could keep on a 1 year deal via arbitration rather than trying to retain him as a free agent.
No question you make an offer to all those players, including Manoah. He’s still got upside and should compete for a starting spot
Hopefully they try and negotiate a 2-year/$10M type deal with Lauer -relatively low risk move
Varsho I think will be a trade candidate this offseason. Unlikely Jays will pay him $100M+ at age 31, especially if they re-sign Bo this offseason
Far more likely they extend Varsho than give a declining Bo Bichette big money
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
- TR50
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,545
- And1: 1,222
- Joined: Dec 19, 2004
-
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
Hoping we can get some positive news on George Springer in the next day or two. Same with Gimenez.
EDIT: Looks like we will be facing Ben Brown, Horton and Boyd.
Fun fact: Boyd was one of the pitchers we gave up for David Price in 2015.
EDIT: Looks like we will be facing Ben Brown, Horton and Boyd.
Fun fact: Boyd was one of the pitchers we gave up for David Price in 2015.
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,465
- And1: 5,995
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
-
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
Just wanted to say Vladdy is once pace for his usual 30 hrs while nearly slashing .300/400/500.
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
- Boogie!
- RealGM
- Posts: 65,831
- And1: 55,765
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Ba da da da daaaaaa. If you build it, they will come!
- Contact:
-
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
johanliebert wrote:Just wanted to say Vladdy is once pace for his usual 30 hrs while nearly slashing .300/400/500.
Awesome hope he reaches 900 ops again this year we’re gonna need his elite bat if we wanna make noise.
mdenny wrote:In anycase....Masai is probably gonna make Fred the first active player/head coach in franchise history now that Nurse is out of the way. That's been the plan all along.
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,669
- And1: 1,935
- Joined: Nov 12, 2008
-
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
johanliebert wrote:Just wanted to say Vladdy is once pace for his usual 30 hrs while nearly slashing .300/400/500.
Arguably having a better season than Soto
If he can keep this pace up for an entire season, he can have a Judge / Othani level season
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,727
- And1: 32,501
- Joined: Jul 22, 2013
- Location: Saskatchewan
-
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
johanliebert wrote:Just wanted to say Vladdy is once pace for his usual 30 hrs while nearly slashing .300/400/500.
Only on pace for 25/26 HRs but I get your point.
Would be nice to see a 2021 level season again though
- Raptors RealGM Forum re: Masai Ujiri - June 2023What an absolute failure and disaster this franchise is, ran by one of the most incompetent front offices in the league.
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
- Raps in 4
- RealGM
- Posts: 66,104
- And1: 60,917
- Joined: Nov 01, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
I feel bad for the Cubs. They haven't even been bad, but they still lost the division lead to a historically hot Brewers team.
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
- Potential
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,724
- And1: 45,460
- Joined: Feb 28, 2015
-
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (69-50) (August 12th-August 14th)
This game is on national tv on TBS. Hopefully we can go on a hot stretch here before our series against the powerhouse orioles rays and red sox

Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (68-51) (August 12th-August 14th)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,093
- And1: 3,626
- Joined: Mar 19, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Chicago Cubs (67-49) vs Blue Jays (68-51) (August 12th-August 14th)
JN wrote:- Varsho and Clement are no brainers.
i was told on this very board that varsho would be a non-tender candidate though
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.
Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).