ImageImageImageImageImage

Acquiring LaMelo

Moderators: Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose, Sleepy51

Upperclass
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,891
And1: 2,209
Joined: Aug 09, 2005

Acquiring LaMelo 

Post#1 » by Upperclass » Sun Sep 28, 2025 4:32 am

The Dubs missed on Ball in 2020.. they have a chance to reconcile that when he's moved this season.

Kon will be Charlottes main ball handler and Ball wont fit their new lineup..

The front office should really be offering Kuminga whatever reasonably tradeable deal, and then using the first month of the season to allow him to showcase his offensive talents.. there arent many other players available who would be able to turn the team into instant contenders as a bought-in Lamelo would.. similar to the Wiggins acquisition.
statsman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,879
And1: 658
Joined: Aug 20, 2006

Re: Acquiring LaMelo 

Post#2 » by statsman » Sun Sep 28, 2025 4:40 am

No real way to fit LaMelo under a 2nd apron hard cap the Warriors will have once Horford is signed to the taxpayer MLE. Well, not unless Butler or Green are also traded.
Twinkie defense
RealGM
Posts: 20,668
And1: 1,698
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Acquiring LaMelo 

Post#3 » by Twinkie defense » Sun Sep 28, 2025 6:25 am

LaMelo was my choice in the 2020 draft over Wiseman.

Davion Mitchell was my choice in 2021 over Kuminga.

Mitchell was a bit of a stretch pick but Warriors would be better off if they had taken both LaMelo and Mitchell instead of Wiseman and Kuminga.
DAWill1128
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,691
And1: 1,973
Joined: Jun 17, 2004
   

Re: Acquiring LaMelo 

Post#4 » by DAWill1128 » Sun Sep 28, 2025 5:05 pm

Not taking Ball over Wiseman when the franchise was reportedly back and forth was a huge mistake. Just having that extra gear with him on the roster would've helped a lot. Maybe he would have been packaged for somebody else positionally after a year or two. With Ball more reigned in on a winning team it could have really helped him. Or maybe it would've kept Pooles contract manageable enough to move Poole for a big.

I think the franchise has really underestimated the level of competition overseas with some of its drafting.
HiRez
RealGM
Posts: 15,003
And1: 4,104
Joined: Dec 29, 2011

Re: Acquiring LaMelo 

Post#5 » by HiRez » Sun Sep 28, 2025 7:46 pm

Hard to decide if Kerr would love or hate LaMelo. I think it could go either way.
User avatar
floppymoose
Senior Mod - Warriors
Senior Mod - Warriors
Posts: 59,402
And1: 17,519
Joined: Jun 22, 2003
Location: Trust your election workers

Re: Acquiring LaMelo 

Post#6 » by floppymoose » Sun Sep 28, 2025 11:48 pm

Ball is a loser. No thanks.
statsman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,879
And1: 658
Joined: Aug 20, 2006

Re: Acquiring LaMelo 

Post#7 » by statsman » Mon Sep 29, 2025 12:04 am

Has anyone noted, other than his 2nd season, that LaMelo has missed a substantial number of games in his career? (stating the obvious)

Lauri looks like a pillar of health in comparison.
User avatar
Chris Porter's Hair
Forum Mod - Warriors
Forum Mod - Warriors
Posts: 8,910
And1: 3,738
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
     

Re: Acquiring LaMelo 

Post#8 » by Chris Porter's Hair » Mon Sep 29, 2025 12:11 am

I am not going to try to argue that Wiseman was a better pick than Ball. But Ball also isn't the guy I'd want, then or now. Aside from his career being riddled with injuries, he continues to strike me as a talented guy that doesn't really make your team better. If we were going big game hunting, that's not the direction I'd go in.
Image

crzyyafrican makes the best sigs, quite frankly
Old_Blue
Analyst
Posts: 3,408
And1: 1,190
Joined: Jul 02, 2019
 

Re: Acquiring LaMelo 

Post#9 » by Old_Blue » Mon Sep 29, 2025 1:09 am

Chris Porter's Hair wrote:I am not going to try to argue that Wiseman was a better pick than Ball. But Ball also isn't the guy I'd want, then or now. Aside from his career being riddled with injuries, he continues to strike me as a talented guy that doesn't really make your team better. If we were going big game hunting, that's not the direction I'd go in.


I don't think I would phrase it quite this way - considering that LaMelo's single best skill is his passing and a good passer absolutely can make his team better. That said, yes, he's hurt entirely too often. Which, in turn, makes his hefty salary a drag on the team. Finally, he's a grossly inefficient scorer. If he was ever in a situation where he was willing to play the role of a third or fourth scoring option, LaMelo could flourish. Sadly, I don't think his ego will ever allow him to get to such a place.
Jester_ wrote:(Referring to the practice of butt caning) Yeah that's why we (Singapore) have beautiful streets and safe communities while y'all (San Francisco) live in bum-adled squalor and think it's freedom :lol:
User avatar
whatisacenter
RealGM
Posts: 13,379
And1: 15,521
Joined: Aug 05, 2013
 

Re: Acquiring LaMelo 

Post#10 » by whatisacenter » Mon Sep 29, 2025 3:03 pm

No thanks to LaMelo and I can't see the FO making that mistake.
Madvillain been as high as Kathmandu
And tilted to the side like that fat man's shoe
User avatar
East Bay Sports
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,747
And1: 2,594
Joined: Jul 05, 2013
     

Re: Acquiring LaMelo 

Post#11 » by East Bay Sports » Mon Oct 6, 2025 8:03 pm

I have never really hated a player and his game as much as I do Ball. I would absolutely hate to see him on this team.
ILOVEIT
RealGM
Posts: 15,043
And1: 3,609
Joined: May 28, 2004

Re: Acquiring LaMelo 

Post#12 » by ILOVEIT » Tue Oct 7, 2025 2:37 am

floppymoose wrote:Ball is a loser. No thanks.


Kerr would hate Ball, for good reasons. He's a flashy gunner who hasn't played defense since he entered the league.

Having watched the Warriors dynasty, if we don't know what it takes to be a winner by now - defense - we don't know hoops.
2021/22 - The return of the Ring.

Return to Golden State Warriors