CLE outgoing/NYK incoming: Larry Hughes, Damon Jones, Donyell Marshall, Ira Newble, Cedric Simmons, Eric Snow, and 2009 1st round pick (lotto protected)
NYK outgoing/CLE incoming: Mardy Collins, Jamal Crawford, Jerome James, Jared Jeffries, Zach Randolph, and Quentin Richardson
Why do the Cavs do this deal?
The team they have right now is clearly not good enough to make it back to the finals. So, they upgrade their talent base by adding a solid big man in Randolph, and 2 wings who can score. They do have to back Jeffries' and James' crappy contracts, but it's worth it for this talent upgrade.
PG: Crawford/Gibson/Collins
SG: Pavlovic/Brown/Brown
SF: James/Richardson/Jeffries
PF: Gooden/Randolph/Jones
C: Ilgauskas/Varejao/James
Why do the Knicks do this deal?
It's time to blow it up, as this current group of players just isn't working out well at all. The Knicks shed a ton of salary with this deal, both now and in the long run. To add in the rebuild, they get a future 1st round pick and a post prospect in Simmons.
PG: Marbury/Robinson/Snow
SG: Hughes/Jones/Jones
SF: Balkman/Chandler/Newble
PF: Lee/Simmons/Marshall
C: Curry/Morris/Rose
CLE/NYK - Lebron gets some help, Knicks shed salary
Moderators: Trader_Joe, BullyKing, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Andre Roberstan, loserX
CLE/NYK - Lebron gets some help, Knicks shed salary
- LeQuitterNotMVP
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,699
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 06, 2007
- Location: Props to Trixx for the avy!
-
-
DanTown8587
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,583
- And1: 9,333
- Joined: Jan 06, 2008
- Location: Chicago
-
1) Why would Cleveland protect that pick
2) That offense in NY would be TERRIBLE
3) Cleveland is NOT taking any contracts that run longer than LeBron and thats exactly what Randolph and Crawford are.
4) This is a terrible trade for NY cause they could get more than that if they traded Randolph-Crawford-Collins individually.
2) That offense in NY would be TERRIBLE
3) Cleveland is NOT taking any contracts that run longer than LeBron and thats exactly what Randolph and Crawford are.
4) This is a terrible trade for NY cause they could get more than that if they traded Randolph-Crawford-Collins individually.
...
- moocow007
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 98,257
- And1: 25,720
- Joined: Jan 07, 2002
- Location: In front of the computer, where else?
-
TheOUTLAW wrote:I'm not so sure that the Cavs want to become the Knicks of the Midwest.
Knicks of the East would be great with Lebron.

Subscribe to NBNF!: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW9GUVpNULS97PyptXXU4w
- LeQuitterNotMVP
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,699
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 06, 2007
- Location: Props to Trixx for the avy!
-
DanTown8587 wrote:1) Why would Cleveland protect that pickBecause we're taking on a crap load of salary.
2) That offense in NY would be TERRIBLE
They would be tanking.
3) Cleveland is NOT taking any contracts that run longer than LeBron and thats exactly what Randolph and Crawford are.Well, if we want to be contenders in the near future, we need to sacrifice that cap room.[/b[
4) This is a terrible trade for NY cause they could get more than that if they traded Randolph-Crawford-Collins individually.[b]Eh, I don't know. Collins for Simmons is in there for salary purposes and roster purposes only. But anyway, I'm not sure if they can get much more for some really bad contracts.
Return to Trades and Transactions



