Indiana
Out: O'Neal, Daniels and Harrison
In: Thomas, Szczerbiak, Lee and Morris
Indiana gets expiring, serviceable big man in Thomas, perimeter bench play from Szczerbiak, up and coming replacement for Foster in Lee and cut/buyout/expiring contract in Morris.
Seattle
Out: Szczerbiak, Thomas and Wilcox
In: O'Neal, Curry and Jones
Seattle gets solid unproven tandem in O'Neal and Curry (both of which would like to have new scenery) and would compliment Durant quite well. Serviceable backup and expiring contract of Jones.
Sacramento
Out: Artest
In: Daniels and Harrison
Sacramento loses the head case which is Artest along with his possible opt out at the end of the year. Get back a serviceable 6th man, who can play some point, in Daniels and a cheap expiring contract in Harrison.
New York
Out: Curry, Jones, Lee and Morris
In: Wilcox and Artest
Knicks get Artest's lock down defense coming with head case, but may fit in well with Isiah since they have crossed paths before. Curry wants out and Lee has had some rumblings of scenery change. Wilcox can come in and work well with Randolph since he isn't looking to be the main man and has stated is best in the pick and roll.
This comes out of seeing all four teams not really having an honest chance at the playoffs without some major roster change. this might help their future franchise in either veteran leadership for rookie players or change of scenery requests.
In any event, looking for honest, non hater responses.
Big Trade - IND/SEA/SAC/NYK
Moderators: BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck
Big Trade - IND/SEA/SAC/NYK
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 140
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 02, 2007
- Location: Indianapolis
- Bac2Basics
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,588
- And1: 3
- Joined: Mar 03, 2001
- Location: "Are you like a crazy person? I'm quite sure they will say so."
-
Re: Big Trade - IND/SEA/SAC/NYK
- moocow007
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 98,229
- And1: 25,675
- Joined: Jan 07, 2002
- Location: In front of the computer, where else?
-
Re: Big Trade - IND/SEA/SAC/NYK
coolweed wrote:New York
Out: Curry, Jones, Lee and Randolph
In: Wilcox and Artest
Knicks get Artest's lock down defense coming with head case, but may fit in well with Isiah since they have crossed paths before. Curry wants out and Lee has had some rumblings of scenery change. Wilcox can come in and work well with Randolph since he isn't looking to be the main man and has stated is best in the pick and roll.
But you have Randolph leaving NY.

Subscribe to NBNF!: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW9GUVpNULS97PyptXXU4w
Re: Big Trade - IND/SEA/SAC/NYK
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 140
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 02, 2007
- Location: Indianapolis
Re: Big Trade - IND/SEA/SAC/NYK
moocow007 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
But you have Randolph leaving NY.
Mistake on my part. it is supposed to say Morris.
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 59,573
- And1: 5,851
- Joined: Jul 21, 2001
- Location: East of West and West of East.
- Contact:
Overall it's pretty unbalanced.
Bad for Indiana
Bad for Sacramento
Ridiculously good for Seattle
value wise it's fair enough for the Knicks, but you leave us too short in the center dept. After this trade our big men would include Zach, Wilcox, Malik & Jerome (who may never play again). Either we keep Morris or Seattle needs to throw us one of their scrub centers just to fill in should we need some size).
but outside of that glitch, this trade is too flawed for Indy, Sac & Seattle.
Bad for Indiana
Bad for Sacramento
Ridiculously good for Seattle
value wise it's fair enough for the Knicks, but you leave us too short in the center dept. After this trade our big men would include Zach, Wilcox, Malik & Jerome (who may never play again). Either we keep Morris or Seattle needs to throw us one of their scrub centers just to fill in should we need some size).
but outside of that glitch, this trade is too flawed for Indy, Sac & Seattle.
Bill Clinton slept with an intern. A consenting adult and he got impeached and nearly disbarred as a result. Donald Trump went to parties showcasing underaged women brought in as basically prostitutes, and he says it's nothing.
Double standard?
Double standard?
- rosevillekings916
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 858
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 11, 2005
- Location: Roseville, Ca
Return to Trades and Transactions