AI-JO-VC

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

yunggunz
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,098
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 21, 2005

AI-JO-VC 

Post#1 » by yunggunz » Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:52 pm

Den trades: AI, Chucky Atkins
Den Receives: Andre Miller, Vince Carter, next years 1st

NJ trades: VC, Magloire
NJ Receives: JO, Atkins, 2 1st round picks

Indy trades: JO, Shawne Williams, 1st round pick
Indy Receives: AI

Philly trades: Dre Miller
Receives: Magloire, Shawne Williams



Denver gets a more balanced lineup.

NJ gets a frontcourt piece that expires with KIdd, allowing them to rebuild immediately after next year.

Indy gets AI....starting lineup of Tinsley/AI/Dunleavy/Granger/Foster

Philly saves money and gets a great prospect.
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

 

Post#2 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:32 pm

Pacers pass. AI isn't going to make us a contender, so why trade a very good prospect and a 1st along with our best player to get him? We basically give away our future and stay in mediocrity at the same time. No deal.
User avatar
LeQuitterNotMVP
Analyst
Posts: 3,699
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 06, 2007
Location: Props to Trixx for the avy!
     

 

Post#3 » by LeQuitterNotMVP » Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:41 pm

Nuggets get way too much.

AI was traded for Miller, Smith, and 2 1sts.
So, you're saying that VC is worth Smith, Atkins, and a 1st? No way. Even if you took out the 1st, it's not close at all.
sec-106
Analyst
Posts: 3,151
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 15, 2007

 

Post#4 » by sec-106 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:42 pm

Sixers pass.
yunggunz
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,098
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 21, 2005

 

Post#5 » by yunggunz » Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:43 pm

LBJ4MVP23 wrote:Nuggets get way too much.

AI was traded for Miller, Smith, and 2 1sts.
So, you're saying that VC is worth Smith, Atkins, and a 1st? No way. Even if you took out the 1st, it's not close at all.



Well AI's value is certainly much higher than when the Sixers traded him.
yunggunz
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,098
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 21, 2005

 

Post#6 » by yunggunz » Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:44 pm

DGrangeRx33 wrote:Pacers pass. AI isn't going to make us a contender, so why trade a very good prospect and a 1st along with our best player to get him? We basically give away our future and stay in mediocrity at the same time. No deal.


It might not make you a championship team, but will probably take you to a top 5 seed and give you a chance to get to the second round. You dont lose any financial flexibility either.

I mean, if you take your approach taht its not worth doing if it doesnt make you a championship team, the Pacers might as well dump JO for expirings right now.
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

 

Post#7 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:48 pm

yunggunz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



It might not make you a championship team, but will probably take you to a top 5 seed and give you a chance to get to the second round. You dont lose any financial flexibility either.


If the Pacers trade JO it will either to become a contender(which won't happen) or to rebuild.

Trading JO, a 1st round pick, and Shawne Williams(showing a lot of promise) is just ridiculous. Why would we trade away 2 HUGE pieces of our future when we are trying to rebuild? It doesn't make sense at all.

Return to Trades and Transactions