OT- Check Up On Randolph

Post #1 » by **Manhattan Project** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:42 am

http://realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=764066

While it was not for his 24/10 performance...

Post #2 » by **Spykes** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:46 am

I'm not sure if I should laugh at this or be disappointed by it. :nonono:

It is pretty funny that the coaches had no clue about it.

Walton'sBeard! · Post #3 » by **Walton'sBeard!** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:49 am

Zach was just helping Nate get a drink. He's the ultimate teammate.

Post #4 » by **Spykes** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:51 am

Walton'sBeard! wrote:Zach was just helping Nate get a drink. He's the ultimate teammate.

PDXKnight · Post #5 » by **PDXKnight** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:03 am

Wow, imagine if the Blazers had kept him, his trade value would be nothing. lol. Granted, he wouldn't have nate Robinson on his team but this just makes me happier that he's gone.

d-train · Post #6 » by **d-train** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:05 am

Zach has to have more self-control than that. I can't tell who is at fault for starting the distraction but Nate at least has enough self-control to not respond to the water throwing. I count the tossing of the towel as admirable self-control.

Post #7 » by **Spykes** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:03 am

d-train wrote:Zach has to have more self-control than that. I can't tell who is at fault for starting the distraction but Nate at least has enough self-control to not respond to the water throwing. I count the tossing of the towel as admirable self-control.

I would too. Ron Artest started a riot in Detroit over nearly the same thing, so I give Nate a lot of credit for not starting a fist fight over on the Knicks bench.

sabi · Post #8 » by **sabi** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:01 am

I love EBS

DeezXXnutZ · Post #9 » by **DeezXXnutZ** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:43 am

I can't believe I ever thought trading Zachs loser a$$ was a bad trade for us...The Knicks must be the most disfunctional team in all sports....

Post #10 » by **Spykes** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:06 pm

Now it looks like the Knicks are serious about bringing in Vince Carter. :rofl:

Just what the Knicks need, another lazy overpaid "star" player.

Post #11 » by **mojomarc** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:37 pm

Spykes wrote:Now it looks like the Knicks are serious about bringing in Vince Carter. Just what the Knicks need, another lazy overpaid "star" player.

Apparently the Knicks think they're on Broadway instead of 8th Avenue--only on Broadway would the name of the headliner on the marquee be more important than the quality of the production.

kumquat · Post #12 » by **kumquat** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:30 pm

I love how david lee just sits there on the bench, you can almost hear him thinking WTF am I doing here :rofl:

Pinot love · Post #13 » by **Pinot love** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:19 pm

kumquat wrote:I love how david lee just sits there on the bench, you can almost hear him thinking WTF am I doing here

There's a guy we could really use, not that I'm unhappy with Frye's effort or play.

the traveller · Post #14 » by **the traveller** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:12 am

Enjoy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lvYf08X6tc

Pattycakes · Post #15 » by **Pattycakes** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 6:32 am

Zach's crossover is what scared sexy off.

breaker91 · Post #16 » by **breaker91** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:24 pm

Here's another Zach related classic. Its Starbury commenting on the trade last summer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYY338_JgvI

"We got a younger, youthier player in Zach."

The man is a poet and he doesn't even know it.

Yangsing · Post #17 » by **Yangsing** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:44 pm

sad really....