ImageImage

bulls fan here/Redd TI

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

dflaschberger
Analyst
Posts: 3,389
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 23, 2004

bulls fan here/Redd TI 

Post#1 » by dflaschberger » Sat Mar 22, 2008 12:31 am

I live in milw but haven't watched the bucks for 3 years, since porter's first year. I imagine a rebuild coming, so how about

lhughes and the #10 for redd?

you get:
a nice pick
a much cheaper, shorter deal
a guard who plays better d and passes more

I see yi and bogut as the future up here, plus their pick this year. of course, redd is much better than hughes, but this deal makes sense to me. I'd also deal CV with mo somehow
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,686
And1: 27,269
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#2 » by trwi7 » Sat Mar 22, 2008 12:33 am

Done. That gives us better D from SG and a lottery pick and after the 2008-2009 season over $24 million in expiring contracts to possibly get us a star player.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
SheedsWeed
RealGM
Posts: 12,931
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Location: to all the killas and the hundred dolla billas
Contact:

 

Post#3 » by SheedsWeed » Sat Mar 22, 2008 12:35 am

Sounds pretty good to me. I would just be worried about him being injury prone.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,686
And1: 27,269
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#4 » by trwi7 » Sat Mar 22, 2008 12:37 am

SheedsWeed wrote:Sounds pretty good to me. I would just be worried about him being injury prone.


Redd hasn't exactly been healthy the past two years.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#5 » by jerrod » Sat Mar 22, 2008 12:37 am

sure


now what about nocioni?
User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

 

Post#6 » by Nowak008 » Sat Mar 22, 2008 12:43 am

Allen went for West, wally, and #5. Redd probably not worth as much as that, but I think we can do a little better then that.

I would rather make this deal then have Redd on the team next year though.
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
User avatar
steger_3434
RealGM
Posts: 18,419
And1: 5,649
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
Location: Getting Rowdy in Section 212 with Squad 6
       

 

Post#7 » by steger_3434 » Sat Mar 22, 2008 12:55 am

Sign me up. Hughes is owed less money, is a serviceable SG who brings more D, and we get a lotto pick.
yiyiyi wrote:give rockets Redd ,houston give you T-MAC in return .please help rockets!
i dont want see that woman anymore !
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,434
And1: 11,238
Joined: May 12, 2002

 

Post#8 » by midranger » Sat Mar 22, 2008 12:56 am

I'd probably do this trade, though I'd rather expend to include Bell and/or Mason for Nocioni. I can't tell how Bulls fans feel about him though.

Something like....

Redd/Bell/2nd rounder

for

Hughes/Nocioni/1st rounder

Probably not fair for the Bulls anymore there.
User avatar
Chapter29
RealGM
Posts: 14,593
And1: 1,235
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Location: Wauwatosa, WI
   

 

Post#9 » by Chapter29 » Sat Mar 22, 2008 1:03 am

midranger wrote:I'd probably do this trade, though I'd rather expend to include Bell and/or Mason for Nocioni. I can't tell how Bulls fans feel about him though.

Something like....

Redd/Bell/2nd rounder

for

Hughes/Nocioni/1st rounder

Probably not fair for the Bulls anymore there.


Done. Twice over.

Though I would prefer to add Mason over Bell.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,434
And1: 11,238
Joined: May 12, 2002

 

Post#10 » by midranger » Sat Mar 22, 2008 1:10 am

I think the Bulls could use Bell more with Duhon on his way out.

If they'd rather have Mason, that;s fine by me.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
Bucks_Revenge
Banned User
Posts: 7,978
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 13, 2004

 

Post#11 » by Bucks_Revenge » Sat Mar 22, 2008 1:45 am

i would do that in a minute...
User avatar
L&H_05
RealGM
Posts: 11,569
And1: 94
Joined: Oct 02, 2005
Location: I love this game !
     

 

Post#12 » by L&H_05 » Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:08 am

WTF ?
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#13 » by jerrod » Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:09 am

L&H_05 wrote:WTF ?



i know, things change, try to go with it
User avatar
L&H_05
RealGM
Posts: 11,569
And1: 94
Joined: Oct 02, 2005
Location: I love this game !
     

 

Post#14 » by L&H_05 » Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:12 am

That's alright, we'll throw Wally and someone at you for Redd and Simmons... It will save the Bucks probably around 40 million or so..

Your owner would probably love it..
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

 

Post#15 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:13 am

L&H_05 wrote:That's alright, we'll throw Wally and someone at you for Redd and Simmons... It will save the Bucks probably around 40 million or so..

Your owner would probably love it..

:banghead:

The sad part is you're most likely right.
dflaschberger
Analyst
Posts: 3,389
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 23, 2004

 

Post#16 » by dflaschberger » Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:44 am

clev has no assets other than expiring-our #10 pick trumps that
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,522
And1: 29,525
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

 

Post#17 » by paulpressey25 » Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:52 am

I agree.....the only assets the Cav's had that I wanted were Hughes, Gooden and the #1 pick.

If the Bulls would be willing to deal, I'd consider the deal as proposed, but probably wouldn't do it unless we expanded it to swap Dez/Nocioni as Midranger suggested.

Bulls have a lot of assets though I'd like us to trade for......any combination of Hinrich, Noah, Noc, Hughes, Gooden coming back in a Redd deal would make me happy.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,752
And1: 6,957
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

 

Post#18 » by LUKE23 » Sat Mar 22, 2008 3:11 am

Done. I'd trade Redd for any lottery pick.
RideEmCowboy24
Analyst
Posts: 3,321
And1: 29
Joined: Apr 07, 2005

 

Post#19 » by RideEmCowboy24 » Sat Mar 22, 2008 3:28 am

lovin it....then try to swing #7/#6 to NJ for #11 + #23 (if they don't make the playoffs)

get a guy like augustin, tyler smith, and someone i don't care still better than just redd
User avatar
Siefer
RealGM
Posts: 16,056
And1: 6,704
Joined: Nov 05, 2006
     

 

Post#20 » by Siefer » Sat Mar 22, 2008 3:48 am

I'd be on board for dealing with Chicago. Like GAD said, they have a lot of worthwhile assets. I'd probably do the deal as proposed, but I'd try to expand it first and see if we couldn't pry away Noc or Gooden.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks