Josh Howard to Portland

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Josh Howard to Portland 

Post#1 » by Krapinsky » Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:41 pm

Dallas sends/Portland receives: Howard
Dallas receives/Portland sends: Pryzbilla, Webster, Jack

Why for Dallas:

Dallas is probably going to lose to New Orleans. Cuban will be eager to see shome changes. After Howard's dismal playoff performance he might be the favorite to go. Kidd/Dampier/Terry are not going to bring anything good in a trade. Dirk is the soul of the franchise. That leaves Howard.

By trading Howard, Dallas brings back some much needed depth it lost in the Kidd trade. Pryz would probably start ahead of Dampier. Webster would immediately become the starting SF. Jack would serve as a nice defensive backup to Kidd.

Dallas's New rotation:

Kidd/Jack
Terry/Stackhouse
Webster/Dirk
Dirk/Bass
Pryz/Dampier

Why for Portland:

They need to make a quantity for quality trade. Howard provides them with a two-way player with playoff experience. He also has a reasonable contract, unlike other options out there (Richard Jefferson, Deng (in a S&T)). They give up three very good players which may be a bummer to some Portland fans, but players like Howard (all-star/value contract) don't come cheap.

Portland's new rotation:

Blake/Rodriguez
Roy/Fernandez
Howard/Jones
Aldridge/Outlaw/Frye
Oden/Aldridge

*The #13 pick could either be used to replace Pryzbilla with a big man (Hibbert/Jordan/McGee) or be used to upgrade the PG position (Augustin/Westbrook).
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

 

Post#2 » by loserX » Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:45 pm

Pretty sure Howard's value hasn't fallen THAT far.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,301
And1: 8,036
Joined: May 28, 2007

 

Post#3 » by Wizenheimer » Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:53 pm

Howard's a good player and would probably fit well in portland...especially if he gave no interviews.

But portland wouldn't be likely to move assets for a SF, even one as good as Howard, when their need at PG is much more immediate. Especially when one of the assets is the backup PG.

And pryzbilla will be unlikely to go anywhere until Oden gains some experience.
loflin3hree5ive
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,342
And1: 67
Joined: Aug 27, 2003
Location: Clipperland

 

Post#4 » by loflin3hree5ive » Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:56 pm

Portland is brining a pot smoker back to the Jail Blazers? I don't think so.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,479
And1: 17,993
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

 

Post#5 » by Schad » Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:59 pm

Wizenheimer wrote:Howard's a good player and would probably fit well in portland...especially if he gave no interviews.

But portland wouldn't be likely to move assets for a SF, even one as good as Howard, when their need at PG is much more immediate. Especially when one of the assets is the backup PG.

And pryzbilla will be unlikely to go anywhere until Oden gains some experience.


There really are no irreplaceable assets in this trade. If championships are the goal, a season without a great back-up center can be tolerated, and Webster obviously becomes expendable with Howard in the mix.

Follow it up by trading LaFrentz and assets for Hinrich, add a big man, and the Blazers are one of the best teams in the league within two years. Probably the best. I can't imagine that they would ever turn this down.
Image
**** your asterisk.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#6 » by Krapinsky » Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:14 pm

[quote="loserX"]Pretty sure Howard's value hasn't fallen THAT far.[/quote}

This statement kind of surprises me. I ask, using Portlands assets, what would be equal value then?

Howard is already up there in age and will be coming off a miserable playoff performance. Portland is givng up three good players all of whom would add some much needed toughness to Dallas' lineup. Pryzbilla is a good defender, is fairly paid, and has value. Webster is an up and comer and could be just as good as Howard eventually. He brings some much needed outside shooting- someone for Dirk to dish to. Jack helps Dallas a lot because he makes up for Kidd's short falls.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,301
And1: 8,036
Joined: May 28, 2007

 

Post#7 » by Wizenheimer » Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:17 pm

Schadenfreude wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



There really are no irreplaceable assets in this trade. If championships are the goal, a season without a great back-up center can be tolerated, and Webster obviously becomes expendable with Howard in the mix.

Follow it up by trading LaFrentz and assets for Hinrich, add a big man, and the Blazers are one of the best teams in the league within two years. Probably the best. I can't imagine that they would ever turn this down.


you're probably right about Portland having a tough time turning it down, although his pot-smoking comments may be the deal killer. Not likely though.

Moving Pryzbilla in the trade would also mean that portland's plan for 2009 cap-space was still viable as well.

And if as you suggest, portland knew they could land Hinrich somehow, this would end up a pretty good off-season
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

 

Post#8 » by loserX » Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:18 pm

^I, for one, am not sold on any of the players Dallas is getting as a legitimate starter. Przybilla is cheaper than Damp, and thus better value, but I'm not sure he's head-and-shoulders better on the court. Webster has some talent, but would only be a starter on Dallas out of necessity. And Jack is closer to a spare part...he's not likely to beat Terry out for minutes either.

If Dallas is to trade Howard, I suspect that they will demand at least a legit starter back. If they don't, it's rebuilding time and guys like Przybilla won't be on the shopping list.
Spykes
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,738
And1: 16
Joined: Mar 15, 2004
Location: Paddy's Pub

 

Post#9 » by Spykes » Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:19 pm

loflin3hree5ive wrote:Portland is brining a pot smoker back to the Jail Blazers? I don't think so.


While the timing is a bit too soon considering he just made those remarks, I don't think it would THAT big a problem.

Just because a player smokes dope don't necessarily mean he automatically can't play for the Blazers and can't be a fan favorite. Look at a guy like Brian Grant for example. I'm sure that guy toked up constantly, but he was a fan favorite in Portland. The big difference between a guy like Howard and a guy like Damon Stoudemire, Shawne Williams, Zach Randolph, Jamaal Tinsley, etc is that he's smart about it. As long as they smoke weed in their own house on their own time and it isn't effecting their play negatively, then the Blazers can look the other way from time to time.

It's guys who are downright stupid about it that the Blazers have a problem with. Guys who are smoking weed and speeding down a residential street in the middle of the night or guys who get caught in the middle of a shoot out with weed or guys who go through metal detectors with weed wrapped in tin foil, those are the kind of guys Portland wants to stay away from. Guys who aren't smart enough to stay out off the police blotter because they smoke weed, not guys who do it in the privacy of their own homes once in awhile.
User avatar
Andre 2999
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,817
And1: 59
Joined: Dec 20, 2004
     

 

Post#10 » by Andre 2999 » Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:25 pm

As a Blazer fan, I would do this trade so long as Pritchard has a backup plan to get us a good, starting PG, whether through the draft, a trade, or free-agency.

Also, would there be any way we could substitute Frye for Przybilla?
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#11 » by Krapinsky » Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:33 pm

Andre 2999 wrote:As a Blazer fan, I would do this trade so long as Pritchard has a backup plan to get us a good, starting PG, whether through the draft, a trade, or free-agency.

Also, would there be any way we could substitute Frye for Przybilla?


IMHO Pryzbilla is probably worth 2 or 3 Fryes. Pryz is also needed for salary concerns so that substitution doesn't make sense to me. Also, Dallas doesn't need another four.

I think the Blazers would still have plenty of assets for a PG. Whether on the cheap- (Outlaw/Rodriguez/#13); or a pricey vet (add Lafrentz' contract). Perhaps save that for another thread.
User avatar
Tekkenlaw
Starter
Posts: 2,078
And1: 39
Joined: Apr 16, 2008

 

Post#12 » by Tekkenlaw » Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:37 pm

loflin3hree5ive wrote:Portland is brining a pot smoker back to the Jail Blazers? I don't think so.
Chances are you already have a few pot smokers on your team, you just don't know it.
User avatar
T-Spot
Veteran
Posts: 2,604
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 30, 2008

 

Post#13 » by T-Spot » Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:41 pm

IMO, Dallas has no need of Pryz with Damp eating their cap over there. I'm sure they'd expect Outlaw back IMO. He's not that old [28?] and season stats if anything have improved since last year so I don't think he's worth what Dallas is getting here.
Image
Derekman
Banned User
Posts: 2,832
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 08, 2007
Location: 519

 

Post#14 » by Derekman » Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:41 pm

Wizenheimer wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



you're probably right about Portland having a tough time turning it down, although his pot-smoking comments may be the deal killer. Not likely though.

Moving Pryzbilla in the trade would also mean that portland's plan for 2009 cap-space was still viable as well.

And if as you suggest, portland knew they could land Hinrich somehow, this would end up a pretty good off-season


If you want, we can make it a three way and send Jose to Portland while sending J-HO to Toronto. Would that make it better for Portland?
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#15 » by Krapinsky » Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:58 pm

T-Spot wrote:IMO, Dallas has no need of Pryz with Damp eating their cap over there. I'm sure they'd expect Outlaw back IMO. He's not that old [28?] and season stats if anything have improved since last year so I don't think he's worth what Dallas is getting here.


Damps getting up there in age, and down there in productivity. Losing Diop was a big loss for Dallas. Pryz replaces what they lost in Diop and probably takes even more minutes from Dampier than Diop did.

Also look at how big the West is getting. Dallas definately needs another big man. San Antonio has Duncan, Phoenix has Shaq and Amare, Lakers have Gasol and Bynum, Portland will have Oden and Aldridge.

Since you suggest Dallas is getting too much and LoserX suggests Dallas is giving too much, all in all it's probably a fair trade.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,301
And1: 8,036
Joined: May 28, 2007

 

Post#16 » by Wizenheimer » Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:14 am

Derekman wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



If you want, we can make it a three way and send Jose to Portland while sending J-HO to Toronto. Would that make it better for Portland?


It might make it better, the problem would be Calderon's BYC status. Toronto would have to send something else out to make up for Calderon's BYC amount and Howard's incoming value. It would also bump everybody to next year's salaries but that shouldn't matter.

The problem may be that portland would trade 2 frontcourt starters this season for one backcourt starter. That 's really violating the 'no big for small' rule.

I'm still inclined to think portland would agree to it though
User avatar
Cookin Baskets
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,864
And1: 267
Joined: Apr 09, 2006
Contact:
 

 

Post#17 » by Cookin Baskets » Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:14 am

loflin3hree5ive wrote:Portland is brining a pot smoker back to the Jail Blazers? I don't think so.


It wasn't cause of pot smoking that made them Jail Blazers it was there stupidity for getting in all kinds of trouble with the law and there lack of maturity and how stupid every blazer got into trouble it wasn't just for smoking god made marijuana. I bet 40/50 percent of the league smokes in the off-season and somehow gets by with getting caught with 4 random drug tests in the season.

You can't really compare Josh Howard to Damon Stoudimare,Rasheed Wallace..just because they smoke pot. There alot of nba players who smoke tree throughout nba history Allen Iverson,Kareem Abdul-Jabbar,Charles Barkley, and many other players that most wouldn't even guess.
I don't think I Trust The Process anymore! :banghead:
We are the originals! We are the Philadelphia 76ers!
User avatar
Teddy KGB
General Manager
Posts: 9,306
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 03, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Contact:

 

Post#18 » by Teddy KGB » Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:19 am

WTF? We trade our 2nd best player for a bunch of ****? Please, please stop with all the Mavs trades. We are NOT trading away Josh Howard for a bucket full of ****.

And no, outside Portland's big 3 there is not enough value to get Howard to Portland. All the spare parts on your team don't add up to a borderline all star
Formerly ss_maverick, JHos Hydro
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#19 » by Krapinsky » Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:22 am

ss_maverick wrote:WTF? We trade our 2nd best player for a bunch of ****? Please, please stop with all the Mavs trades. We are NOT trading away Josh Howard for a bucket full of ****.

And no, outside Portland's big 3 there is not enough value to get Howard to Portland. All the spare parts on your team don't add up to a borderline all star


Blatant homerism. Spare the vulgarity next time please.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,479
And1: 17,993
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

 

Post#20 » by Schad » Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:23 am

Dr.Krapinsky wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Blatant homerism. Spare the vulgarity next time please.


Save for the vulgarity...he's absolutely right. It truly is an atrocious deal for Dallas.
Image
**** your asterisk.

Return to Trades and Transactions