ImageImageImageImageImage

Hughes for Texiera?

Moderator: nykgeneralmanager

cmaff051
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 13,071
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

Hughes for Texiera? 

Post#1 » by cmaff051 » Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:09 pm

Ken Rosental writes that the Yankees should trade Hughes for Texiera straight up, what do you guys think? :D
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/6938410
The following sentences will be written approximately 6,389,432 times before the July 31 non-waiver deadline:

# The Yankees will not trade right-hander Phil Hughes, not even for Rangers first baseman Mark Teixeira.

# The Rangers will not trade Mark Teixeira to the Yankees unless they get Phil Hughes.

Please.

The Yankees are understandably reluctant to move Hughes, who was eight outs away from a no-hitter in his second major-league start.

But no player is untouchable, especially not an unproven pitching prospect, talented though he might be.

Likewise, no prospect is so valuable that a deal can not be completed without him.

If the Rangers trade Teixeira, they will need to involve the Yankees, whose needs and resources make them an ideal match.

The Rangers' plan should be to hold out for Hughes, then accept other prospects from the Yankees' improved farm system, if necessary.

The Yankees, in turn, should demand one of the Rangers' veteran relievers and perhaps a lower-level pitching prospect in any deal for Hughes.


One rival GM projects Hughes as only a No. 3 or No. 4 starter, saying, "I'm not as high as the hype."


Everybody probably knows my opinion on this article... TOILET PAPER. :D
Lord Commander
General Manager
Posts: 7,527
And1: 2,099
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

 

Post#2 » by Lord Commander » Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:55 pm

From a fan who despises the Yanks, I hope Cash makes that deal :wink:
cmaff051
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 13,071
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

 

Post#3 » by cmaff051 » Tue Jun 19, 2007 6:00 pm

ToHoleWithSoul wrote:From a fan who despises the Yanks, I hope Cash makes that deal :wink:


How about Omar trades us Oliver Perez for Matt Desalvo? :)
User avatar
Jitpal
General Manager
Posts: 8,149
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Long Island
Contact:

 

Post#4 » by Jitpal » Tue Jun 19, 2007 6:01 pm

Cashman won't do it. He shouldn't do it. A good 1B is far easier to get than a good starting pitcher. Let alone a future ace. If they don't want to deal him to us normally, that's cool, we can sign him after next year and the Rangers will get nothing. -Jitpal
User avatar
nykgeneralmanager
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 14,172
And1: 306
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#5 » by nykgeneralmanager » Tue Jun 19, 2007 6:11 pm

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: That is all any human being with a brain can do to the idea of trading Hughes for anything other than Johan Santana or Jake Peavy.

As for the 'rival GM' who isn't on the hype, he is probably one of the 20 rival GMs that passed on Hughes in the draft and allowed him to fall into our laps at 21 overall.
gooGD
Rookie
Posts: 1,074
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 14, 2006

 

Post#6 » by gooGD » Tue Jun 19, 2007 6:16 pm

absolutely moronic idea...

the yankees have way too much invested in hughes. all the lore and hype built up for this guy since last year, thats how long hes been "untouchable" so to say. to trade him for a power 1b who is barely a 300 hitter? please, hughes is worth more than that when he didnt look so hot in his first outing and in spring training. rosenthal should know better....

for mark teixeira? please... there are much better young players that could be had if the yankees were willing to give up hughes.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#7 » by Basketball Jesus » Tue Jun 19, 2007 6:45 pm

Somebody needs to create a thread called "National Writer or RealGM poster?
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
AGGiE
Banned User
Posts: 3,718
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 03, 2006

 

Post#8 » by AGGiE » Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:02 pm

hmmmm rival GM....... Theo Epstein?
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#9 » by Basketball Jesus » Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:08 pm

Unnamed GM usually denotes a made-up quote to further a writer's point.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
cmaff051
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 13,071
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

 

Post#10 » by cmaff051 » Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:08 pm

VCKiddRJ1524 wrote:hmmmm rival GM....... Theo Epstein?

:rofl: :rofl: :nod: Seriously, I wouldn't put it past them.

Theo: "Clay Buchholz is the greatest prospect ever and projects as a #1 bonafide ace. Phil Hughes, on the other hand, will be lucky to ever be in the major leagues and will get bombed once he is there. I'm not as high as the hype and think he's a #3 or #4 starter at best"
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#11 » by 34Celtic » Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:14 pm

Basketball Jesus wrote:Somebody needs to create a thread called "National Writer or RealGM poster?
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#12 » by Basketball Jesus » Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:25 pm

Maybe later today I'll start one.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#13 » by 34Celtic » Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:07 pm

Basketball Jesus wrote:Maybe later today I'll start one.


We could sticky it on the General MLB thread. Once or twice a week we could come up with a ridiculus quote, quote it, and then a few days later reveal the source. BRILLLLIANT



mmmm I need a Sam....long day at work.
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
Lord Commander
General Manager
Posts: 7,527
And1: 2,099
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

 

Post#14 » by Lord Commander » Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:11 pm

cmaff051 wrote:How about Omar trades us Oliver Perez for Matt Desalvo? :)


I knew you would come around on "The Olinator." Pretty soon you'll be asking for Maine :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#15 » by 34Celtic » Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:16 pm

ToHoleWithSoul wrote:Pretty soon you'll be asking for Maine :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


I think Omars too smart to trade a whole friggan state.....
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
cmaff051
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 13,071
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

 

Post#16 » by cmaff051 » Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:21 pm

ToHoleWithSoul wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I knew you would come around on "The Olinator." Pretty soon you'll be asking for Maine :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


I don't think I have ever talked trash about Oliver Perez. I have always acknowledge that he has a good arm and just needs to be consistent. He could a legit ace.

John Maine, on the other hand, you guys all know my opinion, and that won't change. :)
Lord Commander
General Manager
Posts: 7,527
And1: 2,099
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

 

Post#17 » by Lord Commander » Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:28 pm

cmaff051 wrote:John Maine, on the other hand, you guys all know my opinion, and that won't change. :)


Give the man his props :nonono: . He pitched a damn good game last night against one of the more formidable AL offenses. 1 through 5, that Twin lineup is nothing the sneeze at.
cmaff051
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 13,071
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

 

Post#18 » by cmaff051 » Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:34 pm

ToHoleWithSoul wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Give the man his props :nonono: . He pitched a damn good game last night against one of the more formidable AL offenses. 1 through 5, that Twin lineup is nothing the sneeze at.


His secondary pitches are just so unimpressive, IMO. He can get by with just his fastball in the AL, though, which is a very very good pitch.

And a formidable AL offense? I don't think so, the Twins are 17th in baseball in runs scored, behind that formidable KC Royals offense. :)
Lord Commander
General Manager
Posts: 7,527
And1: 2,099
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

 

Post#19 » by Lord Commander » Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:45 pm

cmaff051 wrote:And a formidable AL offense? I don't think so, the Twins are 17th in baseball in runs scored, behind that formidable KC Royals offense. :)


Those present numbers aren't indicative of where they'll be at the end of the year. They are always late comers. I expect them to compete for the WC :lol:
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#20 » by 34Celtic » Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:58 pm

cmaff051 wrote:I don't think I have ever talked trash about Oliver Perez. I have always acknowledge that he has a good arm and just needs to be consistent. He could a legit ace.


I think he showed us all that after he was traded for Brian Giles. Why the Pirates would trade him for Xavier Nady is beyond me.
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.

Return to New York Yankees