ImageImageImageImageImage

Gagne signs with Brewers for 1 year, $10 mil

Moderator: JaysRule15

hugehoopsfan
Pro Prospect
Posts: 911
And1: 20
Joined: Sep 12, 2001

Gagne signs with Brewers for 1 year, $10 mil 

Post#1 » by hugehoopsfan » Sun Dec 9, 2007 8:34 pm

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3146990

I know he's got a history of being a great closer, but given his immense struggles at the end of last year isn't this a ridiculous amount for him?
With this and Linebrink getting 4 years, 19 mil, I think we could get a king's ransom for Janssen, Accardo or League, if BJ comes back healthy.
User avatar
asif9t9
Banned User
Posts: 3,758
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 05, 2006

 

Post#2 » by asif9t9 » Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:08 am

I'd have no problem trading League if some team wants to overvalue him. If Gagne can be overvalued, JP needs to figure out a way to make League.

Accardo should already be overvalued. But when is BJ scheduled to come back? Mid season?
arrpy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,220
And1: 5
Joined: May 05, 2007
Location: N.L

 

Post#3 » by arrpy » Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:20 am

1 year, 10 mill! :o
whiterasta80
Analyst
Posts: 3,031
And1: 10
Joined: Apr 14, 2004
Location: London, Canada

 

Post#4 » by whiterasta80 » Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:39 am

What surprised me most was that I read that this was BEFORE bonuses.
User avatar
The-Insider
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,674
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 22, 2005

 

Post#5 » by The-Insider » Mon Dec 10, 2007 2:04 am

Personally, I'd be more worried towards the amount of years in the contract. A 1 year deal seems reasonable for Gagne. The Brewers coughed up some digits, but whether or not Gangne pans out; he'll be off the books the following year. Not really a high risk signing as it seems..
Image
User avatar
asif9t9
Banned User
Posts: 3,758
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 05, 2006

 

Post#6 » by asif9t9 » Mon Dec 10, 2007 2:44 am

The-Insider wrote:Personally, I'd be more worried towards the amount of years in the contract. A 1 year deal seems reasonable for Gagne. The Brewers coughed up some digits, but whether or not Gangne pans out; he'll be off the books the following year. Not really a high risk signing as it seems..


Well, with no cap, nothing is ever a risk in baseball. But we know Milwaukee has little to spend. This smacks of a team trying to buy a few fans by selling this guy as one of the best closers of all time. Hopefully sell some seasons tickets. Then when the guy fails, it won't matter. A $10M investment to buy some season's tickets.
User avatar
The-Insider
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,674
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 22, 2005

 

Post#7 » by The-Insider » Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:00 am

asif9t9 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Well, with no cap, nothing is ever a risk in baseball. But we know Milwaukee has little to spend. This smacks of a team trying to buy a few fans by selling this guy as one of the best closers of all time. Hopefully sell some seasons tickets. Then when the guy fails, it won't matter. A $10M investment to buy some season's tickets.


Nice contradictory.

They didn't trade away anyone to get him like they almost did in July. He will really solidify the backend of the bullpen and theres no problem reducing Turnbow's role into a Closer/Setup role with a comfortable 3 run lead and save Gagne and Riske for closer games. People are quick to forget that Gagne while pitching in the AL had a 2.11 ERA with 16 saves in 17 chances last season for the Rangers. The guy pitched bad in Bos in a reduced role and still finished the season with a 3.81 ERA. Also at 10mil and 1 year Melvin saved the Brewers in case he does turn out sour...
Image
User avatar
asif9t9
Banned User
Posts: 3,758
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 05, 2006

 

Post#8 » by asif9t9 » Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:12 pm

The-Insider wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Nice contradictory.

They didn't trade away anyone to get him like they almost did in July. He will really solidify the backend of the bullpen and theres no problem reducing Turnbow's role into a Closer/Setup role with a comfortable 3 run lead and save Gagne and Riske for closer games. People are quick to forget that Gagne while pitching in the AL had a 2.11 ERA with 16 saves in 17 chances last season for the Rangers. The guy pitched bad in Bos in a reduced role and still finished the season with a 3.81 ERA. Also at 10mil and 1 year Melvin saved the Brewers in case he does turn out sour...


Contradictory? haha At least with Gagne back in the NL, I can cheer for him again. I hope he gets back on track.
User avatar
Banger_bro
Pro Prospect
Posts: 996
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 29, 2005

 

Post#9 » by Banger_bro » Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:22 pm

There is an old baseball saying.....there is no such thing as a bad 1 year contract..
User avatar
asif9t9
Banned User
Posts: 3,758
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 05, 2006

 

Post#10 » by asif9t9 » Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:52 pm

Banger_bro wrote:There is an old baseball saying.....there is no such thing as a bad 1 year contract..


Which makes me wonder. What if we had signed Thomas to a one year deal last year. $10M or $15 or whatever. You think JP would want him back this year based on what he did last year?
The_Hater
GHOAT (Greatest Hater Of All Time)
Posts: 85,319
And1: 40,062
Joined: May 23, 2001
     

 

Post#11 » by The_Hater » Mon Dec 10, 2007 11:24 pm

See this is the type of signings that JP should be looking for. Like others have echoed, the 1 year contract is never a bad move.

If Gagne pitches well and Milwaukee competes for a playoff spot, they keep him. And if he pitches well and the Brewers fade, they trade him for prospects like the Rangers did with him last season. And if he disappoints, they're not stuck with him on a multi-year contact.

It's the type of low-risk, high reward signing that more teams should be making.
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.


April 14th, 2019.
User avatar
The-Insider
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,674
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 22, 2005

 

Post#12 » by The-Insider » Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:52 am

asif9t9 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Contradictory? haha At least with Gagne back in the NL, I can cheer for him again. I hope he gets back on track.


How is Gagne not excelling in a reduced role contradictory to Gagne being better utilized in close games? Why do I even bother
Image

Return to Toronto Blue Jays