ImageImageImage

DX-eight rules for draft success.

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

DX-eight rules for draft success. 

Post#1 » by revprodeji » Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:37 am

http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 31,997
And1: 6,012
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: DX-eight rules for draft success. 

Post#2 » by Devilzsidewalk » Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:36 pm

Of the 84 big men drafted in the top quarter of the round through 2003, 48% have been marginal starters or worse, 16% have become solid starters, and 37% have become stars.

Of the 20 point guards drafted in the top quarter, only two (10%) have been complete busts, 25% have become solid bench players/marginal starters, 20% have become solid starters, and 45% have become stars.

Of the 45 wing players drafted in the top quarter of the round, 26% have been marginal starters or worse, 29% have become solid starters, and 44% have become stars.

Point guards and wings both give you a much better shot at solid contribution five years out from the draft. So a GM has to think long and hard about spending his team’s coveted lottery pick on a big man who does not look like a sure-fire superstar.


I don't agree with that methodology. IF you're going by these numbers they've given: 37% of 84 big men drafted in the top quarter of the 1st round are stars, vs 45% of 20 PGs or 44% of wing men, then I wouldn't think it'd be too crazy to take your chances with the big men. If you land one you'll have a rarer commodity and theoretically a more impactful player.

sure it sucks to draft a bust like Araujo instead of a star like Iguodala, but it'd also suck to draft a solid, but unspectacular player like Josh Childress and miss out on Al Jefferson. You just have to do your homework and look for a guy you can develop.

At any rate, a team shouldn't be scared to draft a position based on other teams' or their own past bad decisions.

If Atlanta was too traumatized after striking out on an undersized center in Shelden Williams, then they could have missed out on another undersized center in Al Horford the next year.

Golden State spent 3 lotto picks on big men, Biedrins, Peanut Butter O'Bryant, and Diogu. If they would've taken the highest rated guard or swingman at the time of each pick, they should've gone Jameer Nelson instead of Beans, Gerald Green instead of Diogu, and Redick or Carney instead of POB. It can go both ways and does. If Seattle would not have spent 3 picks on Sene, Swift, and Petro, and gotten Ronnie Brewer, Kleiza, and Josh Smith, would they be better off? Of course they would. I rest my case. Wait, what? Stop reading this! AH I said stop!
Image
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: DX-eight rules for draft success. 

Post#3 » by revprodeji » Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:04 pm

Good response Devil.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 50,231
And1: 17,152
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: DX-eight rules for draft success. 

Post#4 » by Calinks » Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:10 am

Where the heck is part 2?
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
User avatar
andyhop
Analyst
Posts: 3,627
And1: 1,318
Joined: May 08, 2007
   

Re: DX-eight rules for draft success. 

Post#5 » by andyhop » Wed Jun 25, 2008 2:11 am

"Football is not a matter of life and death...it's much more important than that."- Bill Shankley
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

Re: DX-eight rules for draft success. 

Post#6 » by deeney0 » Wed Jun 25, 2008 2:28 am

At least we've got Rule 7 covered.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves