New nickname

Jcrawford11 · Post #1 » by **Jcrawford11** » Sat Nov 8, 2008 8:56 pm

Jamal 'icewater' Crawford

haters hate lock my thread do what u gotta do......

xxrainnn · Post #2 » by **xxrainnn** » Sat Nov 8, 2008 9:02 pm

Jose7 · Post #3 » by **Jose7** » Sat Nov 8, 2008 9:08 pm

Eh... i kinda like Crawful and Consistently Inconsistent.

Jcrawford11 · Post #4 » by **Jcrawford11** » Sat Nov 8, 2008 9:23 pm

he really only had 1 terrible game so far, against philly he did decent was just a blow out so he didnt play in the 4th

knicksNOTslick · Post #5 » by **knicksNOTslick** » Sat Nov 8, 2008 9:23 pm

icewater?

for how quickly he cools off after a few possessions of getting hot.

Jerryd Bayless · Post #6 » by **Jerryd Bayless** » Sat Nov 8, 2008 9:26 pm

Crawful is money. Can't change that.

Jcrawford11 · Post #7 » by **Jcrawford11** » Sat Nov 8, 2008 9:27 pm

the announcer said it yesterday when he hit those 2 shots......keep hateing thoe i love it moreee

adjacent2bench · Post #8 » by **adjacent2bench** » Sat Nov 8, 2008 9:46 pm

Jcrawford11 wrote:the announcer said it yesterday when he hit those 2 shots......keep hateing thoe i love it moreee

Let me guess. You were in a rush right? :roll:

Jamal is inconsistent and he takes dumb shots that aren't within the offense. He had a bad game yesterday. Sure he was great down the stretch but maybe he wouldn't have to play like that if he remains consistent throughout the game. Sure he won't make all of his shots, it's the dumb shots at dumb times that irks me.

Post #9 » by **nyknicks2k2** » Sat Nov 8, 2008 9:50 pm

Thanks for the daily Crawford update.

TheBluest · Post #10 » by **TheBluest** » Sat Nov 8, 2008 9:50 pm

I like

"40.9% Career FG"

He sucks!

Jcrawford11 · Post #11 » by **Jcrawford11** » Sat Nov 8, 2008 10:46 pm

iceeeeeee water......he can be 0-17 i still feel he can make a game winner...what other clutch player have the knicks had in the modern era? haterrrrrs i luv it let cut him

KnicksGadfly · Post #12 » by **KnicksGadfly** » Sat Nov 8, 2008 11:17 pm

jamal crawford is not even close to h20, let alone icewater..

Jcrawford11 · Post #13 » by **Jcrawford11** » Sat Nov 8, 2008 11:37 pm

h20 could not creat his own shot he was lucky he had a good defensive team around him...he was terrible defender worse then craw......thats right icewater

SDOGBBS · Post #14 » by **SDOGBBS** » Sat Nov 8, 2008 11:40 pm

What happened to JCraw being a guy that could play 1? I never really get to see him play but it seems like his ball handling and play making are non existent. Would you guys do Harrington for Crawford? I think the Warriors need a ballhandler, and while Im pretty sure Crawford isn't the answer, Id be curious to see what you guys think.

blueNorange · Post #15 » by **blueNorange** » Sat Nov 8, 2008 11:43 pm

Jcrawford11 wrote:h20 could not creat his own shot he was lucky he had a good defensive team around him...he was terrible defender worse then craw......thats right icewater

houston didn't need to create his own shot because he knew how to spot up and come off screen, unlikes your boy with the uneven hairline.

crawful could've lost the game yesterday with those 2 horrid momentum changing bricks. don't ever compare crawful to houston, i mean ... comeback to me when crawful makes the all-star team and represents team usa in the olympics.

Smoke24 · Post #16 » by **Smoke24** » Sun Nov 9, 2008 12:34 am

I like the one from yesterday "Chucker N Chief".

ElMatatan · Post #17 » by **ElMatatan** » Sun Nov 9, 2008 3:23 am

J Semen

god shammgod · Post #18 » by **god shammgod** » Sun Nov 9, 2008 3:36 am

Jcrawford11 wrote: i luv it let cut him

i've analyzed this for a minute now and i can't begin to figure out what this is supposed to mean

Jcrawford11 · Post #19 » by **Jcrawford11** » Sun Nov 9, 2008 3:51 am

iam beeing sarcastic saying lets cut him..................... u fool

knicksNOTslick · Post #20 » by **knicksNOTslick** » Sun Nov 9, 2008 3:52 am

Jcrawford11 wrote:iceeeeeee water......he can be 0-17 i still feel he can make a game winner...what other clutch player have the knicks had in the modern era? haterrrrrs i luv it let cut him

He can be 0-17 and you'll still think he had a good game. I would rather be a Jamal hater than have his balls hang on my mouth like you do everytime you start a thread praising this loser.