When James signed his current contract, he could have had two more years that were offered by the Cavs. There was no financial benefit (not a penny) to be gained by signing a shorter contract.
KnicksGod wrote:Buckeye-NBAFan wrote:KnicksGod wrote:- When James signed his current contract, he could have had two more years that were offered by the Cavs. There was no financial benefit (not a penny) to be gained by signing a shorter contract.
Do you understand how the NBA CBA works?
If LeBron took the max length contract from the Cavs, he would make $16,378,325 in 2010-11 and $17,686,100 in 2011-12.
If LeBron opts out in 2010 and resigns with Cleveland, he can make $18M+ in 2010-11 and $19.89M+ in 2011-12, or make $18M+ in 2010-11 and $19.44M+ in 2011-12 with some other team.
The financial benefit of a shorter contract isn't a penny. But it is 3.5 million dollars, which I would consider a large sum of money. Maybe you would not?
This is not accurate. He will not make more in the first two or three years of his next contract than he would have made if he had taken the extra years on THIS contract.
so who is right?
is it true that lebron actually stands to gain nothing financially by opting out b/c the following 2 years on his contract for after 2009/2010 would have beem equal to what he'll sign for if he does opt out for 2010
i also think that the person saying he wouldnt gain anything is also under the impression that he'll sign to a new team....so leave what the cavs could offer out of this and just go for the other 29 teams







