How about this potential Suns Bulls trade

statisback · Post #1 » by **statisback** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 5:19 am

Bulls need a scoring guard so....

Suns trade JRich and Goran Dragic for Tyrus Thomas and Kirk Hinrich. Here would be the lineup. Hopefully we can trade Wallace for Chandler and then Amare could be PF

PG Nash/ Hinrich
SG Barbosa / Hinrich
C Amare/Lopez
PF Ty Thomas/Clark/Admunson
SF Hill/Dudley

eastsidecrossover · Post #2 » by **eastsidecrossover** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 5:34 am

I love Hinrich, but Im not sure I want barbs starting. That backcourt is worst than nash/Jrich. Second of all, I hate that line up. Very soft, small and horrible D. Pass.

RaisingArizona · Post #3 » by **RaisingArizona** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 5:41 am

I like that deal a lot. Then we sign Odom and McDyess and we're contenders.

azballer53 · Post #4 » by **azballer53** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 5:43 am

that deal is completely unfair they would never do that

statisback · Post #5 » by **statisback** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 5:44 am

eastsidecrossover wrote:I love Hinrich, but Im not sure I want barbs starting. That backcourt is worst than nash/Jrich. Second of all, I hate that line up. Very soft, small and horrible D. Pass.

Barbs probably not starting. Hinrich could start at SG and Barbs off the bench. Both Hinrich and TY Thomas would vastly improve the Suns D. If Chandler is obtained then you move TT to the SF and AMare to PF.

statisback · Post #6 » by **statisback** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 5:46 am

statisback wrote:
eastsidecrossover wrote:I love Hinrich, but Im not sure I want barbs starting. That backcourt is worst than nash/Jrich. Second of all, I hate that line up. Very soft, small and horrible D. Pass.

Barbs probably not starting. Hinrich could start at SG and Barbs off the bench. Both Hinrich and TY Thomas would vastly improve the Suns D. If Chandler is obtained then you move TT to the SF and AMare to PF.

I forgot about Sasha. Suns should keep him since he is a big guard who can play D

harshey1388 · Post #7 » by **harshey1388** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 6:05 am

exactly id rather keep sasha who is a better Defender and not get Hinrich. also id much rather have Chandler than Tyrus but thats just me. if Tyson's injury heals up well and the suns medical staff can heal him up like they did will Hill (who played all 82 games) then id much rather have Tyson than Tyrus. but thats just my stand on it.

azballer53 · Post #8 » by **azballer53** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 6:09 am

dont post stuff like this were just gonna get more people like khoee and other(not all) Golden State fans

harshey1388 · Post #9 » by **harshey1388** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 6:14 am

azballer53 wrote:dont post stuff like this were just gonna get more people like khoee and other(not all) Golden State fans

hahaha bro dont act like you didnt like the IGH and Khoee battle :lol:

Risensun · Post #10 » by **Risensun** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 6:14 am

Chicago probably wouldn't want Richardson at his cost. But if they did I'd consider doing that trade.

Even though shorter Hinrich is a much better defender then Richardson, not saying much...

the_warden · Post #11 » by **the_warden** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 6:18 am

As I posted in the other thread, Bulls fans HATE HATE HATE HATE this trade and I don't see why on Earth the Bulls would do it. J-Rich has sooo little value at this point.

From the other thread (someone suggested Salmons/Tyrus for J-Rich):

the_warden wrote:I'm comparing the Bucks and Bulls, as you put it, because that trade sets the market. Asking them to give up Salmons and Tyrus and only getting back J-Rich is simply horrible for them value-wise. They don't have to give up that much to get him. Keep in mind that Amare to the Bulls talks centered around Tyrus.

If you don't believe me, you should go to the Bulls board, post this trade idea, and see the reaction it gets.

Evidence: http://www.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=921506

Bulls fans balk at the idea of Hinrich for Richardson, and they value Salmons/Tyrus more than Hinrich.

azballer53 · Post #12 » by **azballer53** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 6:19 am

harshey1388 wrote:
azballer53 wrote:dont post stuff like this were just gonna get more people like khoee and other(not all) Golden State fans

hahaha bro dont act like you didnt like the IGH and Khoee battle

haha that was awesome if there's one way to go out its like IHG did :lol:

harshey1388 · Post #13 » by **harshey1388** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 6:51 am

for sure i hope to never be kicked off the board but if ever i was as ticked as he was id do it the same way haha but yeah Tyson over Tyrus no?

azballer53 · Post #14 » by **azballer53** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 7:00 am

harshey1388 wrote:for sure i hope to never be kicked off the board but if ever i was as ticked as he was id do it the same way haha but yeah Tyson over Tyrus no?

definately tyson over chandler

NapoleonII · Post #15 » by **NapoleonII** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 7:08 am

Let's be realistic please..

harshey1388 · Post #16 » by **harshey1388** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 7:36 am

NapoleonII wrote:Let's be realistic please..

what are we being realistic about? the fact we might not land Tyrus or the fact we cant land Tyson? clear it up a bit will ya?

YouTube · Post #17 » by **Kerrsed** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 7:39 am

azballer53 wrote:haha that was awesome if there's one way to go out its like IHG did

IHG was a straight G. I die a little bit inside each day knowing that his voice is lost out there on the interwebs without a home. IHG made us all a better person. Word on the web is that IHG had the cure for cancer and was just minutes away from leaking the secrete formula, but was banned before he got the chance. LONG LIVE IHG!! A man among man, a god among gods.

Back to the topic at hand, Bulls say no.

/End of thread.

Post #18 » by **TASTIC** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 7:40 am

kerrsed...what the hell are you on about chief?

YouTube · Post #19 » by **Kerrsed** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 7:46 am

TASTIC wrote:kerrsed...what the hell are you on about chief?

Sorry, just had my midnight blunt, and was feeling a bit emo.

suns12345 · Post #20 » by **suns12345** » Thu Jul 2, 2009 7:51 am

can anyone tell me wat actually hapened to IHG. i seemed to have missed it all. would really appreciate info