ImageImageImage

this is why we're winning

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22

Jimmy76
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 9
Joined: May 01, 2009

this is why we're winning 

Post#1 » by Jimmy76 » Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:35 pm

Steve Nash's clutch time stats

http://www.82games.com/0910/09PHO1.HTM

With 5 or less minutes to go and if the game is within 5 points Nash has so far this year had an offensive rating of 150 and defensive rating of 72

:o
LV-Suns
Analyst
Posts: 3,492
And1: 2,099
Joined: Aug 11, 2009
Location: Las Vegas
   

Re: this is why we're winning 

Post#2 » by LV-Suns » Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:30 pm

I was surprised to see Nash's opposition PER of 14, impressive for his standards.
I Dont wanna be here
kwsqd
Junior
Posts: 357
And1: 394
Joined: Apr 22, 2008
     

Re: this is why we're winning 

Post#3 » by kwsqd » Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:43 pm

Better clutch stats than Kobe, Lebron, Wade, or Dirk.
User avatar
Sun Scorched
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,736
And1: 280
Joined: Aug 01, 2007
   

Re: this is why we're winning 

Post#4 » by Sun Scorched » Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:48 pm

LV-Suns wrote:I was surprised to see Nash's opposition PER of 14, impressive for his standards.


+1
Image
On Steve Nash:
G35 wrote:He may run a great offense but I wouldn't choose him over Amare to start a team.
DirtyDez
Suns Forum College Scout
Posts: 17,166
And1: 6,899
Joined: Jun 25, 2009
Location: the Arizona desert

Re: this is why we're winning 

Post#5 » by DirtyDez » Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:07 pm

We won 4 games last year when trailing after the 3rd qtr... We've already won 5 this year when trailing after 3 qtrs. The diference is the bench and Nash tearing it up when it counts.
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
Jimmy76
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 9
Joined: May 01, 2009

Re: this is why we're winning 

Post#6 » by Jimmy76 » Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:09 pm

DirtyDez wrote:We won 4 games last year when trailing after the 3rd qtr... We've already won 5 this year when trailing after 3 qtrs. The diference is the bench and Nash tearing it up when it counts.


Thats why our SRS is so terrible

Can you imagine how good wed be if actually played decent in the first 3 quarters?
User avatar
WTFsunsFTW
Veteran
Posts: 2,700
And1: 113
Joined: Aug 04, 2007
 

Re: this is why we're winning 

Post#7 » by WTFsunsFTW » Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:49 pm

Jimmy76 wrote:
DirtyDez wrote:We won 4 games last year when trailing after the 3rd qtr... We've already won 5 this year when trailing after 3 qtrs. The diference is the bench and Nash tearing it up when it counts.


Thats why our SRS is so terrible

Can you imagine how good wed be if actually played decent in the first 3 quarters?

Yeah we'd have like the best record in the league or something!
User avatar
Shuttlesworth
Starter
Posts: 2,007
And1: 7
Joined: Feb 24, 2006
Location: Table Town, AZ

Re: this is why we're winning 

Post#8 » by Shuttlesworth » Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:01 am

WTFsunsFTW wrote:
Jimmy76 wrote:
DirtyDez wrote:We won 4 games last year when trailing after the 3rd qtr... We've already won 5 this year when trailing after 3 qtrs. The diference is the bench and Nash tearing it up when it counts.


Thats why our SRS is so terrible

Can you imagine how good wed be if actually played decent in the first 3 quarters?

Yeah we'd have like the best record in the league or something!


This made me lol. Good show sir.
Jimmy76
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 9
Joined: May 01, 2009

Re: this is why we're winning 

Post#9 » by Jimmy76 » Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:29 am

WTFsunsFTW wrote:
Jimmy76 wrote:
DirtyDez wrote:We won 4 games last year when trailing after the 3rd qtr... We've already won 5 this year when trailing after 3 qtrs. The diference is the bench and Nash tearing it up when it counts.


Thats why our SRS is so terrible

Can you imagine how good wed be if actually played decent in the first 3 quarters?

Yeah we'd have like the best record in the league or something!


:lol:

at the end of the season :wink:

Return to Phoenix Suns