Elimination Chamber

Post #1 » by **Celtics_Champs** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 3:30 am

Watching it now..

Glad shaemus lost.

Post #2 » by **Celtics_Champs** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 3:44 am

What an ending, I guess there will be a taker hbk rematch now.

CapeCrusader · Post #3 » by **CapeCrusader** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 3:46 am

Celtics_Champs wrote:What an ending, I guess there will be a taker hbk rematch now.

Thats what i was just thinking....

I dunno i really thought it was going to be HBK vs Triple H....

CapeCrusader · Post #4 » by **CapeCrusader** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 3:47 am

Celtics_Champs wrote:Watching it now..

Glad shaemus lost.

My guess is its him and Triple H at Mania...

Post #5 » by **Celtics_Champs** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 3:51 am

CapeCrusader wrote:
Celtics_Champs wrote:Watching it now..

Glad shaemus lost.

My guess is its him and Triple H at Mania...

Jericho-Edge
Cena-Batista
HBK-Taker
HHH-Shaemus.

Yep, those look like the 4 big ones.

skbucks1985 · Post #6 » by **skbucks1985** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 3:59 am

I think its a very stupid decision to take the title off Sheamus. I think sometimes the WWE tries to surprise us rather than doing the logical thing. It'd been rumored for weeks about HHH-Sheamus for the title and the WWE went with this swerve with Batista. The problem is, HHH-Sheamus for the title was the obvious move and the right move. What's the hook of HHH-Sheamus without the title? What are they gonna feud about, whose cross on their trunks is better? OTOH, Cena-Batista has the Bret tie-in and its two big stars who can grab viewers without the title.

Tricky Ricky · Post #7 » by **Tricky Ricky** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:40 pm

safi wrote:I think its a very stupid decision to take the title off Sheamus. I think sometimes the WWE tries to surprise us rather than doing the logical thing. It'd been rumored for weeks about HHH-Sheamus for the title and the WWE went with this swerve with Batista. The problem is, HHH-Sheamus for the title was the obvious move and the right move. What's the hook of HHH-Sheamus without the title? What are they gonna feud about, whose cross on their trunks is better? OTOH, Cena-Batista has the Bret tie-in and its two big stars who can grab viewers without the title.

x2, as much as I hate HHH I think HHH-Sheamus wouldve been a good match for the belt does anybody really care about HHH-Sheamus non title match? AND OMG whose cross on their trunks is better sounds like those mid 90s feuds like Martell stealing Tatankas feathers or even better my personal fav The Pirate stealing Bret Harts jacket...

Tricky Ricky · Post #8 » by **Tricky Ricky** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:43 pm

Celtics_Champs wrote:
CapeCrusader wrote:
Celtics_Champs wrote:Watching it now..

Glad shaemus lost.

My guess is its him and Triple H at Mania...

Jericho-Edge
Cena-Batista
HBK-Taker
HHH-Shaemus.

Yep, those look like the 4 big ones.

Looks like Jericho-Edge will be the match of the night

I dont care about seeing HBk/Taker again the match has no chance of being better than last time

Cena vs Batista...lets see Cena is a lock to win

and HHH-Sheamus without the belt why not just have this on Raw?

CapeCrusader · Post #9 » by **CapeCrusader** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 7:41 pm

Yeah Jericho and Edge is going to be crazy....I could care less about HBK and Taker as long as Taker wins.

Post #10 » by **Stanford** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:22 pm

I wouldn't mind if HBK won. I'd like to at least go into it thinking there's a chance he could win (although I was marking out all the way through their match last year and knew there wasn't a chance he's lose). This whole steak thing is overrated.

CapeCrusader · Post #11 » by **CapeCrusader** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:29 pm

To me if you end it now..then its as if there was no point of creating the streak in the first place. As amazing as the streak is, if he has that one loss then it becomes irrelevant. The only person I think that should have or could have is Orton...he was up and coming and had an amazing feud going back and forth with Taker.

Post #12 » by **Stanford** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:42 pm

I think it's irrelevant already. It doesn't make me think any more or less of Taker, and it never will. After all, he's being booked to win every year. If they did that to Cena, I'd be pissed.