kodo wrote:drosestruts wrote:Bench Vucevic and start Drummond? Take ten deep breaths bro and rethink that. The vuc slander is outrageous sometimes here.
If you're going to go ultra-micro ball with 6' 3" Javonte Green and 6' 4" Caruso as your PF, someone like Drummond has to be the center instead of a soft, perimeter oriented big like Vuc. Vuc has always worked with an athletic PF like Aaron Gordon or Jonathan Isaac. He has never held down the entire paint by himself.
Chicago is 23rd in points in the paint allowed. EC teams that are contenders are top 3 (Miami, Boston, Milwaukee). Even Toronto is at least top 10. If Vucevic is our team's defensive ceiling, Chicago is going to be treadmilling for a long time.
I feel like there's two separate thoughts going on here.
Point 1 - if we're playing ultra small we'd benefit from a good defensive center. This I agree with, it's just that Drummond isn't that guy. Drummond is an elite rebounder. He is not a good defender. and he's not particularly good at anything else. Swapping Vuc for Drummond would help the team in rebounding. In every other facet I'd say it's neutral at best, or a downgrade.
Points in the paint - I think it's wrong to look at points in the paint and assume it's being led by opposing teams' big men. I think the more likely explanation is that other teams' guards and forwards are better at getting to and scoring in the paint. Toronto, who you called out, as no traditional big man, and yet as you noted scores more in the paint. It's not because Khem Birch is a low-post savant, it's because FVV, Siakam, Barnes, OG, and others attack the basket.
Same goes for Boston and Miami - guys like Tatum, Brown, Butler etc are better at attacking the basket than our top backcourt and wing players. Statmuse.com has shot carts for every player - these opposing guys shoot a lot more near the basket than we do.