Image ImageImage Image

Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

PJSteven22
Starter
Posts: 2,197
And1: 918
Joined: Feb 04, 2022

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1281 » by PJSteven22 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 4:32 am

WindyCityBorn wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:
Jahensle wrote:I think at this point 5/150 would be a good deal for the bulls. He might get more.

Yikes


He has earned every penny.

He’s played well for a month. Calm it down.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,333
And1: 9,311
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1282 » by Jcool0 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 4:34 am

PJSteven22 wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:Yay we’re gonna win 35-40 games and get demolished by the Celtics and Cavs for the foreseeable future.


4 years ago Cleveland won 22 games. There best player was Colin Sexton. Since then they drafted Darius Garland #5, Isaac Okoro #5 and Evan Mobley #3.

They actually tanked. You missed the point again. The issue with Giddey is that he’s too good to let you pick top 5 but he not good enough to lead you anywhere past the first round. We’re essentially a treadmill team.


Cleveland tanked and still only got two 5s and a 3. And only two panned out. In the 2021 draft were they took Mobley... Giddey went 6th.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,154
And1: 11,842
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1283 » by WindyCityBorn » Sun Mar 9, 2025 4:34 am

PJSteven22 wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:Yikes


He has earned every penny.

He’s played well for a month. Calm it down.


It’s not gonna change the rest of the season.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,333
And1: 9,311
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1284 » by Jcool0 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 4:36 am

PJSteven22 wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:Yikes


He has earned every penny.

He’s played well for a month. Calm it down.


Over last 31 games: 14.7/8.6/6.4 on 46/40/83
PJSteven22
Starter
Posts: 2,197
And1: 918
Joined: Feb 04, 2022

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1285 » by PJSteven22 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 4:54 am

Jcool0 wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
4 years ago Cleveland won 22 games. There best player was Colin Sexton. Since then they drafted Darius Garland #5, Isaac Okoro #5 and Evan Mobley #3.

They actually tanked. You missed the point again. The issue with Giddey is that he’s too good to let you pick top 5 but he not good enough to lead you anywhere past the first round. We’re essentially a treadmill team.


Cleveland tanked and still only got two 5s and a 3. And only two panned out. In the 2021 draft were they took Mobley... Giddey went 6th.

That has nothing to do with what I said. They won’t pick that high.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,506
And1: 9,138
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1286 » by Chi town » Sun Mar 9, 2025 5:16 am

Can’t wait to hear Doug’s analysis if Giddey keeps doing this.
PJSteven22
Starter
Posts: 2,197
And1: 918
Joined: Feb 04, 2022

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1287 » by PJSteven22 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 5:29 am

Jcool0 wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
He has earned every penny.

He’s played well for a month. Calm it down.


Over last 31 games: 14.7/8.6/6.4 on 46/40/83

31 games>82 math checks out. Giddey is not even a top 10 PG. why are you going so hard for him.
Ctownbulls
RealGM
Posts: 12,881
And1: 3,770
Joined: May 05, 2001

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1288 » by Ctownbulls » Sun Mar 9, 2025 5:35 am

He's been impressive but still would not resign him for what he will ultimately command.

Sent from my Pixel 9 using Tapatalk
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,506
And1: 9,138
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1289 » by Chi town » Sun Mar 9, 2025 5:41 am

PJSteven22 wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:He’s played well for a month. Calm it down.


Over last 31 games: 14.7/8.6/6.4 on 46/40/83

31 games>82 math checks out. Giddey is not even a top 10 PG. why are you going so hard for him.


His evaluation should be heavily weighted towards post TDL due to his role changing significantly and it being the role you will resign him for and be willing to pay for. His games since TDL def check out as a top 3 player on a good team. I do expect his numbers to dip a little when Vuc returns, mostly scoring.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,506
And1: 9,138
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1290 » by Chi town » Sun Mar 9, 2025 5:42 am

Ctownbulls wrote:He's been impressive but still would not resign him for what he will ultimately command.

Sent from my Pixel 9 using Tapatalk


What is that resign and no resign number?
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,154
And1: 11,842
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1291 » by WindyCityBorn » Sun Mar 9, 2025 5:47 am

PJSteven22 wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:He’s played well for a month. Calm it down.


Over last 31 games: 14.7/8.6/6.4 on 46/40/83

31 games>82 math checks out. Giddey is not even a top 10 PG. why are you going so hard for him.


It’s over. You were wrong.
PJSteven22
Starter
Posts: 2,197
And1: 918
Joined: Feb 04, 2022

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1292 » by PJSteven22 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 5:58 am

WindyCityBorn wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
Over last 31 games: 14.7/8.6/6.4 on 46/40/83

31 games>82 math checks out. Giddey is not even a top 10 PG. why are you going so hard for him.


It’s over. You were wrong.

He’s not a top 10 PG.
PJSteven22
Starter
Posts: 2,197
And1: 918
Joined: Feb 04, 2022

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1293 » by PJSteven22 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 6:00 am

Chi town wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
Over last 31 games: 14.7/8.6/6.4 on 46/40/83

31 games>82 math checks out. Giddey is not even a top 10 PG. why are you going so hard for him.


His evaluation should be heavily weighted towards post TDL due to his role changing significantly and it being the role you will resign him for and be willing to pay for. His games since TDL def check out as a top 3 player on a good team. I do expect his numbers to dip a little when Vuc returns, mostly scoring.

That’s a small sample size.
GuardianEnzo
Senior
Posts: 729
And1: 431
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
         

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1294 » by GuardianEnzo » Sun Mar 9, 2025 6:12 am

Giddey could win the MVP next year (he won't, LOL) and these same posters would still be crying sample size and bemoaning that we didn't get a pick instead.
PJSteven22
Starter
Posts: 2,197
And1: 918
Joined: Feb 04, 2022

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1295 » by PJSteven22 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 6:18 am

GuardianEnzo wrote:Giddey could win the MVP next year (he won't, LOL) and these same posters would still be crying sample size and bemoaning that we didn't get a pick instead.

I’d be happy with that.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,154
And1: 11,842
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1296 » by WindyCityBorn » Sun Mar 9, 2025 6:36 am

PJSteven22 wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:31 games>82 math checks out. Giddey is not even a top 10 PG. why are you going so hard for him.


It’s over. You were wrong.

He’s not a top 10 PG.


:lol:
PJSteven22
Starter
Posts: 2,197
And1: 918
Joined: Feb 04, 2022

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1297 » by PJSteven22 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 6:52 am

WindyCityBorn wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
It’s over. You were wrong.

He’s not a top 10 PG.


:lol:

He’s not.
Luka
Shai
Brunson
Steph
Dame
Haliburton
Cade
Garland
Maxey
Fox

You’re wrong take the L
DrModesty
Rookie
Posts: 1,043
And1: 1,045
Joined: Jan 09, 2020

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1298 » by DrModesty » Sun Mar 9, 2025 7:15 am

I've been a pro Giddey poster here. He is not a top 10 PG in this league. That said, half the league has a starting point guard on the max, and there are another half dozen PG's on $30m+. What that shows, is the lead ball handlers get paid huge money. Prior to the change in circumstances I thought Giddey would be a low 20s contract. If this keeps up he might be on Jalen Green money. By the way, he is clearly better than Jalen Green. He has been his entire career outside of Green's sporadic good months he has 1-2 months per season. Jalen Green's contract shows how much of a bump 'potential' puts on rookie extensions.
User avatar
ThisGuyFawkes
Analyst
Posts: 3,691
And1: 1,990
Joined: Jan 30, 2008
Location: Where the sugar cane grows taller than the God we once believed in
   

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1299 » by ThisGuyFawkes » Sun Mar 9, 2025 8:09 am

DrModesty wrote:I've been a pro Giddey poster here. He is not a top 10 PG in this league. That said, half the league has a starting point guard on the max, and there are another half dozen PG's on $30m+. What that shows, is the lead ball handlers get paid huge money. Prior to the change in circumstances I thought Giddey would be a low 20s contract. If this keeps up he might be on Jalen Green money. By the way, he is clearly better than Jalen Green. He has been his entire career outside of Green's sporadic good months he has 1-2 months per season. Jalen Green's contract shows how much of a bump 'potential' puts on rookie extensions.


Name me the better 10 PG's. None of them have his rebounding numbers to compliment the court vision and assists/TO ratio. Or do they have better shooting percentages?

I know you're a Giddey supporter, but how can you also say that he's not an elite producer for his role?

The issue is that you have to build a team around him. Defense, rim protectors, and 3-pt shooters. Lonzo, Ayo, Matas, Coby (?). So is he worth building a team around? He's only 22 years old?

I don't know if Giddey is worth it, and as I think about it, I'm actually not sure what I'm trying to say here. I just think Josh could be a really good player on an elite team if that team is well constructed. But I also don't trust AKME to construct that team. He certainly can't be on the same starting lineup with Vuc, which is why we've probably seen more success recently even though we've been "tanking".
DrModesty
Rookie
Posts: 1,043
And1: 1,045
Joined: Jan 09, 2020

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1300 » by DrModesty » Sun Mar 9, 2025 8:34 am

ThisGuyFawkes wrote:
DrModesty wrote:I've been a pro Giddey poster here. He is not a top 10 PG in this league. That said, half the league has a starting point guard on the max, and there are another half dozen PG's on $30m+. What that shows, is the lead ball handlers get paid huge money. Prior to the change in circumstances I thought Giddey would be a low 20s contract. If this keeps up he might be on Jalen Green money. By the way, he is clearly better than Jalen Green. He has been his entire career outside of Green's sporadic good months he has 1-2 months per season. Jalen Green's contract shows how much of a bump 'potential' puts on rookie extensions.


Name me the better 10 PG's. None of them have his rebounding numbers to compliment the court vision and assists/TO ratio. Or do they have better shooting percentages?

I know you're a Giddey supporter, but how can you also say that he's not an elite producer for his role?

The issue is that you have to build a team around him. Defense, rim protectors, and 3-pt shooters. Lonzo, Ayo, Matas, Coby (?). So is he worth building a team around? He's only 22 years old?

I don't know if Giddey is worth it, and as I think about it, I'm actually not sure what I'm trying to say here. I just think Josh could be a really good player on an elite team if that team is well constructed. But I also don't trust AKME to construct that team. He certainly can't be on the same starting lineup with Vuc, which is why we've probably seen more success recently even though we've been "tanking".


Luka, SGA, Brunson, Steph, Garland, Cade, Dame, Derrick White, Haliburton, Maxey

It is worth noting that I left some very highly regarded players off of my list as they are currently only questionably better than Giddey at the moment (Ja, Trae, Harden, Jamal Murray, LaMelo + more) and you only asked for 10.

Giddey produces at an elite level, but his flaws have held back his impact. I am confident that with further improvement Giddey could one day be a top 10 point guard. It could even happen fairly soon. But he lacks in certain areas that are fairly core functions for a point guard. Those would be dynamic scoring ability and 3 point shooting. His array of scoring options is very rudimentary at this stage, simplifying defense for the opponent.

The positive outlook would be that he hasn't been able to focus on these aspects of his game so far in his career. This is because things like defense and open 3 point shooting have threatened to take him off the floor in these first few years. Developing these to an 'acceptable' level + being given lead ball handling duties may give him the opportunities needed to develop a nice pull up shot from the nail, or a serviceable step back three that make defending the Bulls as a team a much more challenging prospect.

Return to Chicago Bulls