Ron Harper wrote:]johnnyvann840 wrote:Ron Harper wrote:Yeah, but if you watched him play during the preseason you saw the type of skillset he is working with. He has a brutal floor game.
He only played significant minutes in ONE GAME and played GREAT.
vs. Bucks DNP
1st game played vs Mavs 7 minutes 2 pts (1-2) , 2 assists, 1 reb, 1 blk , no TO's
vs. Wiz... 17 minutes 5 pts (2-4), 5 assists, 4 rebs, 1 TO.
vs. Raps DNP
vs. Mavs DNP
vs. Magic played 2 minutes ZEROS
vs. Raps DNP
vs. IND DNP
He only played 26 minutes in the entire preseason. But looked REALLY GOOD in the one game where he actually played and the few minutes got in the the other he looked very good.
No, he looked bad, he isn't a pro basketball player. You think there may be a reason he played so few minutes, ended up in the D-League, and is still stuck there?
We signed a guy who was sitting on his butt doing nothing (not even playing in the D League cause he wore out his D League eligibility and SUCKED doing it) and then came in and lost a game for us. I can guarantee you right now that Kyle Weaver is FAR, FAR better in every aspect of basketball- ball handling, passing, shooting and especially defending, than John Lucas III. If you can honestly say you would rather have Lucas III on the end of the bench, then............. OK, I guess.
Just sayin he's better than Lucas and has potential. I watched him for OKC in a few REAL NBA games and he looked good to me then. He looked good in the 26 minutes he played for us in preseason and SEVERAL DOZEN posters here all commented how good he passed and handled the ball and how good his FLOOR GAME actually looked.

























