Boozer does not compete
Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, RedBulls23, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, Tommy Udo 6
Re: Boozer does not compete
-
crazytown
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,637
- And1: 757
- Joined: Oct 13, 2004
- Location: Los Angeles
-
Re: Boozer does not compete
Boozer did the same thing with Utah. Why is anyone surprised by this? Dude got owned by Gasol and Odom.
Re: Boozer does not compete
- PMONSTER
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,400
- And1: 1,301
- Joined: Nov 28, 2009
-
Re: Boozer does not compete
Nobull wrote:PMONSTER wrote:chadrucf wrote:"soft" is the most meaningless term in basketball. Just say he isn't a good defender, and doesn't give maximum effort on that end. Be done with it. Don't make up reasons to criticize and stereotype a player based on bias.
I'm sorry but doesn't bad defense and not maximum effort equal soft? Does in my book.
Lazy is my word for it.
You right. Boozer is extra Lazy.
NBA Playoffs.... I can never wait!
Re: Boozer does not compete
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 38,080
- And1: 31,376
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
Re: Boozer does not compete
chadrucf wrote:"soft" is the most meaningless term in basketball. Just say he isn't a good defender, and doesn't give maximum effort on that end. Be done with it. Don't make up reasons to criticize and stereotype a player based on bias.
What? Why use 10 words when you can use one?
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: Boozer does not compete
- ManualRam
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,361
- And1: 2,749
- Joined: Jun 25, 2004
-
Re: Boozer does not compete
boozer's pretty much a turd. he's not even that effective on offense because of his slow ass feet.
even if he gets out on hansbrough, he'll still get beat off the dribble because of his aforementioned slow ass feet.
more taj please. at least he doesnt just stare at the offensive player.
boozer's not just lazy, he's incapable.
even if he gets out on hansbrough, he'll still get beat off the dribble because of his aforementioned slow ass feet.
more taj please. at least he doesnt just stare at the offensive player.
boozer's not just lazy, he's incapable.
Re: Boozer does not compete
-
chadrucf
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,000
- And1: 5,016
- Joined: Jan 07, 2010
Re: Boozer does not compete
Nobull wrote:PMONSTER wrote:chadrucf wrote:"soft" is the most meaningless term in basketball. Just say he isn't a good defender, and doesn't give maximum effort on that end. Be done with it. Don't make up reasons to criticize and stereotype a player based on bias.
I'm sorry but doesn't bad defense and not maximum effort equal soft? Does in my book.
Lazy is my word for it.
Why do you need words for it at all? Just call it bad defense and poor effort.
Many players exemplified that today. But by calling it soft, you can target one player of your choosing.
Re: Boozer does not compete
- Red Larrivee
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,692
- And1: 19,678
- Joined: Feb 15, 2007
- Location: Hogging Microphone Time From Tom Dore
Re: Boozer does not compete
crazytown wrote:Boozer did the same thing with Utah. Why is anyone surprised by this? Dude got owned by Gasol and Odom.
Yeah it must suck to get owned by the 2-time defending champs.
Re: Boozer does not compete
-
bullsnewdynasty
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,666
- And1: 2,552
- Joined: Sep 11, 2009
Re: Boozer does not compete
Because when you get a $76 million dollar contract and you're not giving maximum effort, you don't get excuses. Because there are no more excuses. This is the playoffs. We've waited plenty of time for Boozer to get his game in form. People are starting to treat him like Wallace in pointing out the little positives he gives to the team, like intangible type stuff, and completely ignoring the negative stuff.
Re: Boozer does not compete
-
Indomitable
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,764
- And1: 7,033
- Joined: Jul 11, 2001
- Location: Yelzenbah!
-
Re: Boozer does not compete
Show me one time I said a negative about Deng. Goodluck.
Bogans my only beef is you got to take that shot when you wide open by 10 ft
Noah when he dogs it I complain.
Boozer gives a crap effort on D. All this he slow of foot excuses. Kurt Thomas can close then boozer can close. Thomas give a sheet and Boozer fakes it.
Bogans my only beef is you got to take that shot when you wide open by 10 ft
Noah when he dogs it I complain.
Boozer gives a crap effort on D. All this he slow of foot excuses. Kurt Thomas can close then boozer can close. Thomas give a sheet and Boozer fakes it.
Re: Boozer does not compete
-
bullsnewdynasty
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,666
- And1: 2,552
- Joined: Sep 11, 2009
Re: Boozer does not compete
And we were some Rose and Korver heroics away from the entire forum raking Boozer over the coals for his performance in this game. I don't think you can just ignore the way he played just because we won the game.
Re: Boozer does not compete
-
m_willis01
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,163
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 11, 2007
Re: Boozer does not compete
Boozer is who he is.. TRASH on D, and Inconsistent On Offense...
BUT, Thibs CANNOT continue to keep him out there.. TAJ MUST play vs Tyler
BUT, Thibs CANNOT continue to keep him out there.. TAJ MUST play vs Tyler
Re: Boozer does not compete
- TheAdmiral
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,676
- And1: 1,213
- Joined: Nov 24, 2009
-
Re: Boozer does not compete
Red Larrivee wrote:crazytown wrote:Boozer did the same thing with Utah. Why is anyone surprised by this? Dude got owned by Gasol and Odom.
Yeah it must suck to get owned by the 2-time defending champs.
Right now he's getting owned by Hansbrough. Not exactly a world beater.
D-31 wrote:again..all of u Jordan fans are caught up in his scoring accolades and fail to realize that he was a lousy basketball player.
Jordan never fully understood basketball. He had the lowest basketball IQ of any NBA "superstar" in history.
Re: Boozer does not compete
-
chadrucf
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,000
- And1: 5,016
- Joined: Jan 07, 2010
Re: Boozer does not compete
HomoSapien wrote:chadrucf wrote:"soft" is the most meaningless term in basketball. Just say he isn't a good defender, and doesn't give maximum effort on that end. Be done with it. Don't make up reasons to criticize and stereotype a player based on bias.
What? Why use 10 words when you can use one?
What? Why be accurate and descriptive when you could typecast and generalize? You know, being lazy and not providing defense (to your argument), like everyone's favorite power forward.
Re: Boozer does not compete
- Red Larrivee
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,692
- And1: 19,678
- Joined: Feb 15, 2007
- Location: Hogging Microphone Time From Tom Dore
Re: Boozer does not compete
m_willis01 wrote:Boozer is who he is.. TRASH on D, and Inconsistent On Offense...
BUT, Thibs CANNOT continue to keep him out there.. TAJ MUST play vs Tyler
Were you not watching when Hansbrough was abusing Gibson too?
TheAdmiral wrote:Right now he's getting owned by Hansbrough. Not exactly a world beater.
He was not the only one guarding Hansbrough today.
Re: Boozer does not compete
-
Bullsmaniac
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,164
- And1: 0
- Joined: Oct 29, 2001
- Location: The Greatest City in the World-CHICAGO
Re: Boozer does not compete
Boozer is so disappointing!! I can't believe he allowed Hansbrough to bitch slap him the entire game.
He better own up to his suckiness and do something about it next game. I'm so disappointed in him!
He better own up to his suckiness and do something about it next game. I'm so disappointed in him!
Re: Boozer does not compete
-
chadrucf
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,000
- And1: 5,016
- Joined: Jan 07, 2010
Re: Boozer does not compete
Nobull wrote:Noah when he dogs it I complain.
So why are you not complaining? His defense was just as poor as Boozer's.
Re: Boozer does not compete
-
Wizard of POOH
- Banned User
- Posts: 487
- And1: 0
- Joined: Mar 23, 2011
- Location: Chicago & Orlando
Re: Boozer does not compete
Positive over negative people, he was trying or did you forget he got fouled early and didn't play as much.
Re: Boozer does not compete
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 38,080
- And1: 31,376
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
Re: Boozer does not compete
chadrucf wrote:HomoSapien wrote:chadrucf wrote:"soft" is the most meaningless term in basketball. Just say he isn't a good defender, and doesn't give maximum effort on that end. Be done with it. Don't make up reasons to criticize and stereotype a player based on bias.
What? Why use 10 words when you can use one?
What? Why be accurate and descriptive when you could typecast and generalize? You know, being lazy and not providing defense (to your argument), like everyone's favorite power forward.
But what you've described is the basketball definition of soft. Why make it more complicated?
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: Boozer does not compete
-
chicagos finest
- Ballboy
- Posts: 31
- And1: 1
- Joined: Aug 11, 2010
-
Re: Boozer does not compete
it is what it is... on to game 2
Re: Boozer does not compete
-
boogydown
- Banned User
- Posts: 26,221
- And1: 15
- Joined: Dec 14, 2004
Re: Boozer does not compete
I have nothing to truly say here. People just complain and complain when the reality is Tyler was hitting everything today. It happens, deal with it.
Re: Boozer does not compete
- jl342323
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,789
- And1: 531
- Joined: May 26, 2010
Re: Boozer does not compete
chadrucf wrote:Nobull wrote:Noah when he dogs it I complain.
So why are you not complaining? His defense was just as poor as Boozer's.
people need to end complaining in the game thread. we won, period
“He don’t care (about offense). He just cares about defense. When we come down or shoot a bad shot or whatever, he don’t really care about that. -Rose talking about Thibs









