Image ImageImage Image

Boozer does not compete

Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, RedBulls23, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, Tommy Udo 6

crazytown
Veteran
Posts: 2,637
And1: 757
Joined: Oct 13, 2004
Location: Los Angeles
   

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#21 » by crazytown » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:31 pm

Boozer did the same thing with Utah. Why is anyone surprised by this? Dude got owned by Gasol and Odom.
User avatar
PMONSTER
Head Coach
Posts: 6,400
And1: 1,301
Joined: Nov 28, 2009
     

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#22 » by PMONSTER » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:31 pm

Nobull wrote:
PMONSTER wrote:
chadrucf wrote:"soft" is the most meaningless term in basketball. Just say he isn't a good defender, and doesn't give maximum effort on that end. Be done with it. Don't make up reasons to criticize and stereotype a player based on bias.

I'm sorry but doesn't bad defense and not maximum effort equal soft? Does in my book.

Lazy is my word for it.

You right. Boozer is extra Lazy.
NBA Playoffs.... I can never wait!
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 38,094
And1: 31,382
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#23 » by HomoSapien » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:33 pm

chadrucf wrote:"soft" is the most meaningless term in basketball. Just say he isn't a good defender, and doesn't give maximum effort on that end. Be done with it. Don't make up reasons to criticize and stereotype a player based on bias.


What? Why use 10 words when you can use one?
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
User avatar
ManualRam
RealGM
Posts: 23,361
And1: 2,749
Joined: Jun 25, 2004
     

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#24 » by ManualRam » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:34 pm

boozer's pretty much a turd. he's not even that effective on offense because of his slow ass feet.
even if he gets out on hansbrough, he'll still get beat off the dribble because of his aforementioned slow ass feet.
more taj please. at least he doesnt just stare at the offensive player.
boozer's not just lazy, he's incapable.
chadrucf
RealGM
Posts: 10,000
And1: 5,016
Joined: Jan 07, 2010

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#25 » by chadrucf » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:34 pm

Nobull wrote:
PMONSTER wrote:
chadrucf wrote:"soft" is the most meaningless term in basketball. Just say he isn't a good defender, and doesn't give maximum effort on that end. Be done with it. Don't make up reasons to criticize and stereotype a player based on bias.

I'm sorry but doesn't bad defense and not maximum effort equal soft? Does in my book.

Lazy is my word for it.


Why do you need words for it at all? Just call it bad defense and poor effort.

Many players exemplified that today. But by calling it soft, you can target one player of your choosing.
User avatar
Red Larrivee
RealGM
Posts: 42,692
And1: 19,678
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: Hogging Microphone Time From Tom Dore

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#26 » by Red Larrivee » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:37 pm

crazytown wrote:Boozer did the same thing with Utah. Why is anyone surprised by this? Dude got owned by Gasol and Odom.


Yeah it must suck to get owned by the 2-time defending champs.
bullsnewdynasty
RealGM
Posts: 23,666
And1: 2,552
Joined: Sep 11, 2009

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#27 » by bullsnewdynasty » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:37 pm

Because when you get a $76 million dollar contract and you're not giving maximum effort, you don't get excuses. Because there are no more excuses. This is the playoffs. We've waited plenty of time for Boozer to get his game in form. People are starting to treat him like Wallace in pointing out the little positives he gives to the team, like intangible type stuff, and completely ignoring the negative stuff.
Indomitable
RealGM
Posts: 26,766
And1: 7,034
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: Yelzenbah!
     

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#28 » by Indomitable » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:38 pm

Show me one time I said a negative about Deng. Goodluck.

Bogans my only beef is you got to take that shot when you wide open by 10 ft

Noah when he dogs it I complain.

Boozer gives a crap effort on D. All this he slow of foot excuses. Kurt Thomas can close then boozer can close. Thomas give a sheet and Boozer fakes it.
:banghead:
bullsnewdynasty
RealGM
Posts: 23,666
And1: 2,552
Joined: Sep 11, 2009

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#29 » by bullsnewdynasty » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:39 pm

And we were some Rose and Korver heroics away from the entire forum raking Boozer over the coals for his performance in this game. I don't think you can just ignore the way he played just because we won the game.
m_willis01
Banned User
Posts: 4,163
And1: 0
Joined: May 11, 2007

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#30 » by m_willis01 » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:39 pm

Boozer is who he is.. TRASH on D, and Inconsistent On Offense...

BUT, Thibs CANNOT continue to keep him out there.. TAJ MUST play vs Tyler
User avatar
TheAdmiral
RealGM
Posts: 22,676
And1: 1,213
Joined: Nov 24, 2009
   

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#31 » by TheAdmiral » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:39 pm

Red Larrivee wrote:
crazytown wrote:Boozer did the same thing with Utah. Why is anyone surprised by this? Dude got owned by Gasol and Odom.


Yeah it must suck to get owned by the 2-time defending champs.


Right now he's getting owned by Hansbrough. Not exactly a world beater.
D-31 wrote:again..all of u Jordan fans are caught up in his scoring accolades and fail to realize that he was a lousy basketball player.

Jordan never fully understood basketball. He had the lowest basketball IQ of any NBA "superstar" in history.
chadrucf
RealGM
Posts: 10,000
And1: 5,016
Joined: Jan 07, 2010

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#32 » by chadrucf » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:40 pm

HomoSapien wrote:
chadrucf wrote:"soft" is the most meaningless term in basketball. Just say he isn't a good defender, and doesn't give maximum effort on that end. Be done with it. Don't make up reasons to criticize and stereotype a player based on bias.


What? Why use 10 words when you can use one?


What? Why be accurate and descriptive when you could typecast and generalize? You know, being lazy and not providing defense (to your argument), like everyone's favorite power forward.
User avatar
Red Larrivee
RealGM
Posts: 42,692
And1: 19,678
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: Hogging Microphone Time From Tom Dore

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#33 » by Red Larrivee » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:40 pm

m_willis01 wrote:Boozer is who he is.. TRASH on D, and Inconsistent On Offense...

BUT, Thibs CANNOT continue to keep him out there.. TAJ MUST play vs Tyler


Were you not watching when Hansbrough was abusing Gibson too?

TheAdmiral wrote:Right now he's getting owned by Hansbrough. Not exactly a world beater.


He was not the only one guarding Hansbrough today.
Bullsmaniac
RealGM
Posts: 13,164
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 29, 2001
Location: The Greatest City in the World-CHICAGO

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#34 » by Bullsmaniac » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:41 pm

Boozer is so disappointing!! I can't believe he allowed Hansbrough to bitch slap him the entire game.

He better own up to his suckiness and do something about it next game. I'm so disappointed in him!
chadrucf
RealGM
Posts: 10,000
And1: 5,016
Joined: Jan 07, 2010

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#35 » by chadrucf » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:43 pm

Nobull wrote:Noah when he dogs it I complain.


So why are you not complaining? His defense was just as poor as Boozer's.
Wizard of POOH
Banned User
Posts: 487
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 23, 2011
Location: Chicago & Orlando

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#36 » by Wizard of POOH » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:44 pm

Positive over negative people, he was trying or did you forget he got fouled early and didn't play as much.
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 38,094
And1: 31,382
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#37 » by HomoSapien » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:44 pm

chadrucf wrote:
HomoSapien wrote:
chadrucf wrote:"soft" is the most meaningless term in basketball. Just say he isn't a good defender, and doesn't give maximum effort on that end. Be done with it. Don't make up reasons to criticize and stereotype a player based on bias.


What? Why use 10 words when you can use one?


What? Why be accurate and descriptive when you could typecast and generalize? You know, being lazy and not providing defense (to your argument), like everyone's favorite power forward.


But what you've described is the basketball definition of soft. Why make it more complicated?
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
chicagos finest
Ballboy
Posts: 31
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 11, 2010
 

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#38 » by chicagos finest » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:46 pm

it is what it is... on to game 2
boogydown
Banned User
Posts: 26,221
And1: 15
Joined: Dec 14, 2004

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#39 » by boogydown » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:46 pm

I have nothing to truly say here. People just complain and complain when the reality is Tyler was hitting everything today. It happens, deal with it.
User avatar
jl342323
General Manager
Posts: 8,789
And1: 531
Joined: May 26, 2010

Re: Boozer does not compete 

Post#40 » by jl342323 » Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:47 pm

chadrucf wrote:
Nobull wrote:Noah when he dogs it I complain.


So why are you not complaining? His defense was just as poor as Boozer's.

people need to end complaining in the game thread. we won, period
“He don’t care (about offense). He just cares about defense. When we come down or shoot a bad shot or whatever, he don’t really care about that. -Rose talking about Thibs

Return to Chicago Bulls