Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Junior
- Posts: 290
- And1: 121
- Joined: Jul 04, 2017
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Lonzo must have requested a trade. The trade checker on this site does not allow the trade to work. Maybe they have Lonzo's salary too high.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,004
- And1: 4,734
- Joined: Aug 18, 2006
- Location: Rogers Park
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Cost controlled draft picks are good options AKME. Keep blasting them media.
Jcool0 wrote:aguifs wrote:Do we have a friggin plan?
If the Bulls do, you would be complaining to much to ever hear it.
NBA fan logic we need to trade one of two best players because (Player X) one needs to shine more.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Senior
- Posts: 716
- And1: 425
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
I'd l'd like to see Jones re-signed now but I think he'll get $13-14M and I doubt we go there.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,266
- And1: 387
- Joined: Sep 13, 2011
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Why AK??? This is the deal they saved Lonzo for? Smh
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Junior
- Posts: 290
- And1: 121
- Joined: Jul 04, 2017
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
The Bulls signed Ball to a two-year, $20MM extension in February despite trade interest at the time. He’s on the books for $10MM this season and has a team option for next year.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,968
- And1: 6,114
- Joined: Jun 29, 2009
- Location: Tampa
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Sigh...good job there guys. 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,365
- And1: 1,337
- Joined: Sep 27, 2001
- Location: Socal
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Damn. Well Cavs get there final piece ala Caruso.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
- nomorezorro
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,198
- And1: 10,297
- Joined: Jun 22, 2006
- Location: bfk
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
zombie knee lonzo ball is probably not going to be the cavs' caruso
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Junior
- Posts: 290
- And1: 121
- Joined: Jul 04, 2017
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Meanwhile, the Bulls are taking a flier of their own in obtaining former No. 5 overall pick Okoro. The Cavaliers didn’t re-sign Okoro to a multi-year contract until September of last year after he became a restricted free agent following the 2024 season.
Okoro’s playing time decreased in new head coach Kenny Atkinson’s system, and he averaged career lows of 6.1 points and 19.1 minutes. In the playoffs, Okoro’s averages shrunk to 4.6 points across 14.2 minutes. He’ll be in the second year of the three-year, $33MM deal he inked with Cleveland last year. This year, he’ll count for $11MM before his contract jumps to a guaranteed $11.8MM next season.
Okoro’s playing time decreased in new head coach Kenny Atkinson’s system, and he averaged career lows of 6.1 points and 19.1 minutes. In the playoffs, Okoro’s averages shrunk to 4.6 points across 14.2 minutes. He’ll be in the second year of the three-year, $33MM deal he inked with Cleveland last year. This year, he’ll count for $11MM before his contract jumps to a guaranteed $11.8MM next season.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
- Axl Rose
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,841
- And1: 4,091
- Joined: Jul 03, 2013
- Location: Superunknown
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Wisedude wrote:Lonzo must have requested a trade. The trade checker on this site does not allow the trade to work. Maybe they have Lonzo's salary too high.
They probably haven't updated the salary for next year. With next years salary of 10m the trade will work.
So yes this is another sh*tty straight up trade

I don't do the dishes, I throw them in the crib
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,367
- And1: 1,349
- Joined: Jan 20, 2010
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
This trade makes zero sense. I'm so confused.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
- coldfish
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 60,629
- And1: 37,931
- Joined: Jun 11, 2004
- Location: Right in the middle
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
AKME is basically trying to take up a bunch of guys coming into the prime of their careers who are on bargain contracts. Its an interesting, never been tried philosophy but Okoro has been bad.
Going a little with this, if you look at most players they peak right around age 27. They usually suck from age 18 to 22. AKME is trying to play a statistical game of putting together a bunch of 24 to 27 year olds and hoping it works out.
I don't think AKME is a good GM but I'll give them credit for trying something unique.
Going a little with this, if you look at most players they peak right around age 27. They usually suck from age 18 to 22. AKME is trying to play a statistical game of putting together a bunch of 24 to 27 year olds and hoping it works out.
I don't think AKME is a good GM but I'll give them credit for trying something unique.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
- Jvaughn
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,066
- And1: 4,644
- Joined: May 18, 2009
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
burlydee wrote:This trade makes zero sense. I'm so confused.
When you remember who our FO is, this trade makes complete sense.

spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.
teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,400
- And1: 9,089
- Joined: Aug 10, 2004
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
ShouldaPaidBG wrote:Trade P Will? Nah. Add another
This.
What a DUMB trade.
Maybe the tank is in play.
Watch AK outdo himself by trading Pat with the POR pick to get an even worse contract.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
- Jcool0
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,302
- And1: 9,285
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
- Location: Illinois
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,400
- And1: 9,089
- Joined: Aug 10, 2004
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
coldfish wrote:AKME is basically trying to take up a bunch of guys coming into the prime of their careers who are on bargain contracts. Its an interesting, never been tried philosophy but Okoro has been bad.
Going a little with this, if you look at most players they peak right around age 27. They usually suck from age 18 to 22. AKME is trying to play a statistical game of putting together a bunch of 24 to 27 year olds and hoping it works out.
I don't think AKME is a good GM but I'll give them credit for trying something unique.
It’s def this.
The only hope is Okoro excels in a pace system unlike Pat.
This also seems like it will be forcing Billy to play big with Giddey at the 1 and wings at the 3 and 4. Otherwise where does Pat and Noa play.
Okoro can play PF. I’m sure Billy will find mins for him there.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,367
- And1: 1,349
- Joined: Jan 20, 2010
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
coldfish wrote:AKME is basically trying to take up a bunch of guys coming into the prime of their careers who are on bargain contracts. Its an interesting, never been tried philosophy but Okoro has been bad.
Going a little with this, if you look at most players they peak right around age 27. They usually suck from age 18 to 22. AKME is trying to play a statistical game of putting together a bunch of 24 to 27 year olds and hoping it works out.
I don't think AKME is a good GM but I'll give them credit for trying something unique.
I think they could have got a better deal. This strikes me as a complete reach on Okoro. I'm not sure why any team needs to pay Okoro and PWill $29 million a year. Its the same guy.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Junior
- Posts: 329
- And1: 181
- Joined: Jan 06, 2017
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Could this be considered a "stealth tank" trade to get worse for next year? Or would Lonzo being here and only playing 40 games be better for the tank?
You can buy manure outside, from better grazing grounds for your bulls, but if you never cultivate your own feces to flower better weeds you will always look to other side of a fence. - Koristossu
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 852
- And1: 546
- Joined: May 26, 2001
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
The particulars of this deal are mundane. What's exciting about this trade is that it looks like a precursor to a Pat trade.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,400
- And1: 9,089
- Joined: Aug 10, 2004
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
keobulls wrote:Could this be considered a "stealth tank" trade to get worse for next year? Or would Lonzo being here and only playing 40 games be better for the tank?
Here’s to hoping…
Even if it was it’s better to keep Zo let him be hurt on the bench and then not pick up his option next season.