Infinity2152 wrote:It's kind of hilarious armchair GM's think they do better analysis and have a quarter of the info the teams have, lol. I keep seeing people talk about Vuc wouldn't get that on the free agent market, Pat wouldn't get that on the free agent market, now Giddey won't get paid on the free agent market. I'm ABSOLUTELY sure they put feelers around the league to get an idea of what these players would get offered, and absolutely sure they have more sources with other teams. Then fans put their personal feelings about the player in, and ignore very similar players on other teams get just as much or more. Call the Bulls cheap on one hand then saying they keep massively overpaying their free agents doesn't click. They made Zach go and find his own offer, rather than overpaying him.
They had a good idea of Vuc's market value, better than fans. Had a good idea of Pat's market value, better than fans. Fans are in here talking about the max they would give a 22-year-old with 4 years of experience already and is a walking triple double threat is $12-15 mill/yr. You're insane if you think that's even close to his market, then get disappointed when they sign him to more. Just say you don't want to pay him what he's worth, not that he's not worth what he gets.
For the most part, I agree that FOs know way more than fans. They have more insight to a bunch of things that fans can't. They also have to cope with human aspects of the game that fans often forget and can't see.
That said, while this general statement is true, there are still wide gaps between good and bad FOs. Our FO is one of the worst in the league. It pains me how little vision they have, how poor their overall strategy is, and how middling their execution is. They do not seem to understand how to read FA well, draft well, and seem to regularly lose trades when they make them. Even to the extent they have some execution wins, because their overall strategy is non-sensical and misguided, they don't amount to anything.