Image ImageImage Image

Shams: Lonzo for Okoro

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

SfBull
General Manager
Posts: 7,932
And1: 1,836
Joined: Jan 17, 2011
       

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#361 » by SfBull » Sun Jun 29, 2025 3:24 am

On the other side I was Okoro's fan since his draft.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,280
And1: 8,998
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#362 » by Dan Z » Sun Jun 29, 2025 3:25 am

DuckIII wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
DuckIII wrote:I’ve decided I like this trade based on a real time analysis. There are scenarios where it looks badly later, but I don’t evaluate trades that way.

It’s not exactly what I would have done, but it’s perfectly logical and justifiable. I’m in.


Why would it look bad later?


Lonzo plays like old Lonzo, is perfectly healthy, and could then reasonably be assumed to have greater trade value by the deadline. That’s a game of chance, which is part of why I have come down on supporting the trade, but it’s a very plausible outcome. It’s in fact what I would have done instead of trading him now, but I can absolutely see the sense in what AK chose to do instead. It checks a lot of boxes. It’s a different kind of smart move, and that’s okay.


If that happens I think you just shrug and except it for what it is.

Overall the trade is minor so it's not a big deal, but to me it say mediocrity. It's upgrading a role player position and that's about it. Okoro has been in the league 5 years, so I bet he is who is at this point.

If the Memphis deal was really offered then AK should've taken that (but I have no idea if it was really true).
User avatar
ThisGuyFawkes
Analyst
Posts: 3,664
And1: 1,975
Joined: Jan 30, 2008
Location: Where the sugar cane grows taller than the God we once believed in
   

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#363 » by ThisGuyFawkes » Sun Jun 29, 2025 3:26 am

DuckIII wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:
Read on Twitter


Jake Weinbach clearly is not familiar with our game. That’s not in the playbook.


I don't think Jake realizes how unimportant draft picks are, and how important financial flexibility is. :lol:
dice
RealGM
Posts: 43,928
And1: 12,940
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#364 » by dice » Sun Jun 29, 2025 3:27 am

Indomitable wrote:
dice wrote:
Indomitable wrote:Incompetence

derozan was a free agent sign and trade for a guy about to be 35. lavine's contract was awful. artie was lucky to get what he got with both those deals. the incompetence was what he had to GIVE UP to get/retain those two

i would have taken a pick over giddey, but i doubt that's the consensus here. and obviously nobody was offering a 1st for lonzo. nothing artie can do there unless he forgot to say "going once...going twice..."

All of those were examples of overplaying their hand.

Knicks offered a similar package to Bridges
Derozan could have been moved two years in a row before he was a free agent.

Caruso would have got you more if you move him earlier.

Timing in life matters.

the very strong majority of bulls fans were thrilled when artie mortgaged the future to trade for vuc/derozan and fight for a playoff spot. because neither fans nor management had much appetite for tanking. why, then, would it surprise anybody that management was not willing to completely reverse course and trade good players for picks and go back in the tank? did we really expect admission of failure combined with a change of mindset?
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,280
And1: 8,998
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#365 » by Dan Z » Sun Jun 29, 2025 3:30 am

dice wrote:
Indomitable wrote:
dice wrote:derozan was a free agent sign and trade for a guy about to be 35. lavine's contract was awful. artie was lucky to get what he got with both those deals. the incompetence was what he had to GIVE UP to get/retain those two

i would have taken a pick over giddey, but i doubt that's the consensus here. and obviously nobody was offering a 1st for lonzo. nothing artie can do there unless he forgot to say "going once...going twice..."

All of those were examples of overplaying their hand.

Knicks offered a similar package to Bridges
Derozan could have been moved two years in a row before he was a free agent.

Caruso would have got you more if you move him earlier.

Timing in life matters.

the very strong majority of bulls fans were thrilled when artie mortgaged the future to trade for vuc/derozan and fight for a playoff spot. because neither fans nor management had much appetite for tanking. why, then, would it surprise anybody that he and the org were not willing to completely reverse course and trade good players for picks and go back in the tank? did we really expect admission of failure combined with a change of mindset?


I don't think anyone really expected it, but were hoping that AK could see that the team was headed nowhere and that it was time to pivot to the next iteration of the team.

EDIT: I should add that by not making moves he was delaying the inevitable.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 28,983
And1: 8,909
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#366 » by Chi town » Sun Jun 29, 2025 3:44 am

DuckIII wrote:
Chi town wrote:So who think Okoro is our defensive ace that starts with Giddey and Coby defending the best guard?


Based on today’s roster it’s either gonna be him or Pat. Noa is extremely unlikely to be ready in November. Unless we really are going to try to tank the season a bit.


Not Huerter or Tre? Or Ayo?
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,386
And1: 36,704
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#367 » by DuckIII » Sun Jun 29, 2025 3:45 am

Dan Z wrote:
DuckIII wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
Why would it look bad later?


Lonzo plays like old Lonzo, is perfectly healthy, and could then reasonably be assumed to have greater trade value by the deadline. That’s a game of chance, which is part of why I have come down on supporting the trade, but it’s a very plausible outcome. It’s in fact what I would have done instead of trading him now, but I can absolutely see the sense in what AK chose to do instead. It checks a lot of boxes. It’s a different kind of smart move, and that’s okay.


If that happens I think you just shrug and except it for what it is.


That is what I’ll do. I’m fine with the trade. I give zero weight to hindsight analysis.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,200
And1: 9,244
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#368 » by Jcool0 » Sun Jun 29, 2025 4:00 am

Read on Twitter
Peelboy
Starter
Posts: 2,147
And1: 1,094
Joined: Jun 23, 2007

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#369 » by Peelboy » Sun Jun 29, 2025 4:49 am

MrFortune3 wrote:Here's what I take from this and many other threads. People hate the draft picks that AKME make and they loathe the job they have done in developing them. Then in the same breath they get pissed that they aren't gathering more draft picks instead of players...

Lonzo is an injury prone expiring contract, there is nothing wrong with nabbing Okoro for him.

Analogy: I think you’re a terrible chef whose food is near inedible. I can also be upset that you buy spoiled produce at excessive prices.

Some is generally poor at drafting. They also generally misvalue their assets in trade, and lack strategy of the kind of assets to trade for given their position.

This trade is just another example of that, IMO. By no means the most egregious one though. Just a small brick in that wall.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,280
And1: 8,998
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#370 » by Dan Z » Sun Jun 29, 2025 5:00 am

Peelboy wrote:
MrFortune3 wrote:Here's what I take from this and many other threads. People hate the draft picks that AKME make and they loathe the job they have done in developing them. Then in the same breath they get pissed that they aren't gathering more draft picks instead of players...

Lonzo is an injury prone expiring contract, there is nothing wrong with nabbing Okoro for him.

Analogy: I think you’re a terrible chef whose food is near inedible. I can also be upset that you buy spoiled produce at excessive prices.

Some is generally poor at drafting. They also generally misvalue their assets in trade, and lack strategy of the kind of assets to trade for given their position.

This trade is just another example of that, IMO. By no means the most egregious one though. Just a small brick in that wall.


My issue with AKME is that they don't try to acquire additional draft picks. it's NBA currency and the team needs to find it's franchise player to build around.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,280
And1: 8,998
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#371 » by Dan Z » Sun Jun 29, 2025 5:25 am

DropStep wrote:We got our own pick back in the Lavine/Fox trade. Lonzo was a 1 for 1 player trade. So was Caruso. 1 for 1 player trades seem pretty rare, no? It's almost like AKME would just rather not deal with picks, especially other people's picks, whose value you have no control over. Just keep them, we're good? lol. I think and hope that it's kind of a joke when people say AK hates draft picks, but it's starting to feel kind of weird. Both of these trades are perfectly even? Not even a second going either direction, or a swap of seconds? He doesn't seem to be looking for lottery tickets or to swindle anyone for value, it feels like he's just looking for fit, to the scheme and to the timeline. But one of his prime duties is negotiating for value, both with players and other teams. This is a cheap shot... but is he doing it?


I think you're right that he doesn't try to get draft picks. This is a guy who turned down taking on Harrison Barnes to get the Kings swap rights.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,666
And1: 35,730
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#372 » by jbk1234 » Sun Jun 29, 2025 5:34 am

Cavs fan here. I come in peace. If you're looking for a reason to be bullish on Okoro, he had some of the best impact stats (on/off, +/-) on the Cavs every year since his rookie year.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
samwana
General Manager
Posts: 9,995
And1: 2,585
Joined: Jul 24, 2002
Location: Munich (Germany)
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#373 » by samwana » Sun Jun 29, 2025 6:23 am

jbk1234 wrote:Cavs fan here. I come in peace. If you're looking for a reason to be bullish on Okoro, he had some of the best impact stats (on/off, +/-) on the Cavs every year since his rookie year.
Thanks for bringing some perspective here!
pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,253
And1: 4,216
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#374 » by pipfan » Sun Jun 29, 2025 6:25 am

jbk1234 wrote:Cavs fan here. I come in peace. If you're looking for a reason to be bullish on Okoro, he had some of the best impact stats (on/off, +/-) on the Cavs every year since his rookie year.

Thanks-I am more optimistic than most here on this deal, and I loved Ball (too bad that player is probably done)

White/Jones/Carter
Okoro/Ayo/Terry
Giddey/Huerter/Phillips
Matas/Pwill/JSmith
Vuc (let's deal him too)/Collins/JSmith

Play fast
WesPeace
Senior
Posts: 657
And1: 297
Joined: Jan 12, 2025
Location: Planet Earth
     

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#375 » by WesPeace » Sun Jun 29, 2025 6:57 am

pipfan wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:Cavs fan here. I come in peace. If you're looking for a reason to be bullish on Okoro, he had some of the best impact stats (on/off, +/-) on the Cavs every year since his rookie year.

Thanks-I am more optimistic than most here on this deal, and I loved Ball (too bad that player is probably done)

White/Jones/Carter
Okoro/Ayo/Terry
Giddey/Huerter/Phillips
Matas/Pwill/JSmith
Vuc (let's deal him too)/Collins/JSmith

Play fast


Same here.. Okoro at least plays with high energy, hustles and goes for rebounds compared to PWill..

Lets hope this lights then fire under Pat's ass a bit and he comes back leaner, faster and ready to fight for SF starting role.
Rose2Boozer
Veteran
Posts: 2,618
And1: 802
Joined: Apr 07, 2011

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#376 » by Rose2Boozer » Sun Jun 29, 2025 7:32 am

jbk1234 wrote:Cavs fan here. I come in peace. If you're looking for a reason to be bullish on Okoro, he had some of the best impact stats (on/off, +/-) on the Cavs every year since his rookie year.


Do you think trading for Lonzo Ball means you're more than likely will lose Ty Jerome?
ROLES & HOLES
User avatar
Andi Obst
General Manager
Posts: 9,450
And1: 6,811
Joined: Mar 11, 2013
Location: Germany

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#377 » by Andi Obst » Sun Jun 29, 2025 7:45 am

I hated the deal initially and still don't love it, but it's okay I guess. Pretty likely that Okoro helps you more than Lonzo next year due to injuries. Cavs save some money but don't save enough money to attach assets. I get it.

Would love to see the exact deadline offers the Bulls got for Lonzo.
Muzbar
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,172
And1: 2,815
Joined: Apr 03, 2002
Location: Australia
Contact:
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#378 » by Muzbar » Sun Jun 29, 2025 8:45 am

Red8911 wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:
Read on Twitter

We had so many here bching and moaning that the Bulls will keep the same exact team as last year because Eversley mentioned it in the presser.

Never believe what they say in those pressers, most of it is BS. They can’t say they want to trade their players for obvious reasons and instead lie.

Wait. So don't believe what the teams General Manager says, despite it being what they've done for most of their tenure. But do believe a journalist on twitter that reports the complete opposite of what the team has done for several years now.
Here to argue about nonsensical things and suck away your joy. :kissmybutt:
User avatar
BullChit
Head Coach
Posts: 6,903
And1: 3,874
Joined: Jan 17, 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#379 » by BullChit » Sun Jun 29, 2025 10:08 am

Muzbar wrote:
Red8911 wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:
Read on Twitter

We had so many here bching and moaning that the Bulls will keep the same exact team as last year because Eversley mentioned it in the presser.

Never believe what they say in those pressers, most of it is BS. They can’t say they want to trade their players for obvious reasons and instead lie.

Wait. So don't believe what the teams General Manager says, despite it being what they've done for most of their tenure. But do believe a journalist on twitter that reports the complete opposite of what the team has done for several years now.


Fake front office news.
eMar arnell eRozen... The "D" stands for "Defence"
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,666
And1: 35,730
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#380 » by jbk1234 » Sun Jun 29, 2025 10:24 am

Rose2Boozer wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:Cavs fan here. I come in peace. If you're looking for a reason to be bullish on Okoro, he had some of the best impact stats (on/off, +/-) on the Cavs every year since his rookie year.


Do you think trading for Lonzo Ball means you're more than likely will lose Ty Jerome?


Almost certainly. We only had early bird rights.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.

Return to Chicago Bulls