Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,934
- And1: 1,836
- Joined: Jan 17, 2011
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
On the other side I was Okoro's fan since his draft.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,283
- And1: 9,002
- Joined: Feb 19, 2002
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
DuckIII wrote:Dan Z wrote:DuckIII wrote:I’ve decided I like this trade based on a real time analysis. There are scenarios where it looks badly later, but I don’t evaluate trades that way.
It’s not exactly what I would have done, but it’s perfectly logical and justifiable. I’m in.
Why would it look bad later?
Lonzo plays like old Lonzo, is perfectly healthy, and could then reasonably be assumed to have greater trade value by the deadline. That’s a game of chance, which is part of why I have come down on supporting the trade, but it’s a very plausible outcome. It’s in fact what I would have done instead of trading him now, but I can absolutely see the sense in what AK chose to do instead. It checks a lot of boxes. It’s a different kind of smart move, and that’s okay.
If that happens I think you just shrug and except it for what it is.
Overall the trade is minor so it's not a big deal, but to me it say mediocrity. It's upgrading a role player position and that's about it. Okoro has been in the league 5 years, so I bet he is who is at this point.
If the Memphis deal was really offered then AK should've taken that (but I have no idea if it was really true).
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
- ThisGuyFawkes
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,664
- And1: 1,975
- Joined: Jan 30, 2008
- Location: Where the sugar cane grows taller than the God we once believed in
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
DuckIII wrote:NecessaryEvil wrote:
Jake Weinbach clearly is not familiar with our game. That’s not in the playbook.
I don't think Jake realizes how unimportant draft picks are, and how important financial flexibility is.

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 43,933
- And1: 12,940
- Joined: Jun 30, 2003
- Location: chicago
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Indomitable wrote:dice wrote:Indomitable wrote:Incompetence
derozan was a free agent sign and trade for a guy about to be 35. lavine's contract was awful. artie was lucky to get what he got with both those deals. the incompetence was what he had to GIVE UP to get/retain those two
i would have taken a pick over giddey, but i doubt that's the consensus here. and obviously nobody was offering a 1st for lonzo. nothing artie can do there unless he forgot to say "going once...going twice..."
All of those were examples of overplaying their hand.
Knicks offered a similar package to Bridges
Derozan could have been moved two years in a row before he was a free agent.
Caruso would have got you more if you move him earlier.
Timing in life matters.
the very strong majority of bulls fans were thrilled when artie mortgaged the future to trade for vuc/derozan and fight for a playoff spot. because neither fans nor management had much appetite for tanking. why, then, would it surprise anybody that management was not willing to completely reverse course and trade good players for picks and go back in the tank? did we really expect admission of failure combined with a change of mindset?
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,283
- And1: 9,002
- Joined: Feb 19, 2002
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
dice wrote:Indomitable wrote:dice wrote:derozan was a free agent sign and trade for a guy about to be 35. lavine's contract was awful. artie was lucky to get what he got with both those deals. the incompetence was what he had to GIVE UP to get/retain those two
i would have taken a pick over giddey, but i doubt that's the consensus here. and obviously nobody was offering a 1st for lonzo. nothing artie can do there unless he forgot to say "going once...going twice..."
All of those were examples of overplaying their hand.
Knicks offered a similar package to Bridges
Derozan could have been moved two years in a row before he was a free agent.
Caruso would have got you more if you move him earlier.
Timing in life matters.
the very strong majority of bulls fans were thrilled when artie mortgaged the future to trade for vuc/derozan and fight for a playoff spot. because neither fans nor management had much appetite for tanking. why, then, would it surprise anybody that he and the org were not willing to completely reverse course and trade good players for picks and go back in the tank? did we really expect admission of failure combined with a change of mindset?
I don't think anyone really expected it, but were hoping that AK could see that the team was headed nowhere and that it was time to pivot to the next iteration of the team.
EDIT: I should add that by not making moves he was delaying the inevitable.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,983
- And1: 8,909
- Joined: Aug 10, 2004
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
DuckIII wrote:Chi town wrote:So who think Okoro is our defensive ace that starts with Giddey and Coby defending the best guard?
Based on today’s roster it’s either gonna be him or Pat. Noa is extremely unlikely to be ready in November. Unless we really are going to try to tank the season a bit.
Not Huerter or Tre? Or Ayo?
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
- DuckIII
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 71,386
- And1: 36,704
- Joined: Nov 25, 2003
- Location: On my high horse.
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Dan Z wrote:DuckIII wrote:Dan Z wrote:
Why would it look bad later?
Lonzo plays like old Lonzo, is perfectly healthy, and could then reasonably be assumed to have greater trade value by the deadline. That’s a game of chance, which is part of why I have come down on supporting the trade, but it’s a very plausible outcome. It’s in fact what I would have done instead of trading him now, but I can absolutely see the sense in what AK chose to do instead. It checks a lot of boxes. It’s a different kind of smart move, and that’s okay.
If that happens I think you just shrug and except it for what it is.
That is what I’ll do. I’m fine with the trade. I give zero weight to hindsight analysis.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
- Jcool0
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,200
- And1: 9,244
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
- Location: Illinois
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,147
- And1: 1,094
- Joined: Jun 23, 2007
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
MrFortune3 wrote:Here's what I take from this and many other threads. People hate the draft picks that AKME make and they loathe the job they have done in developing them. Then in the same breath they get pissed that they aren't gathering more draft picks instead of players...
Lonzo is an injury prone expiring contract, there is nothing wrong with nabbing Okoro for him.
Analogy: I think you’re a terrible chef whose food is near inedible. I can also be upset that you buy spoiled produce at excessive prices.
Some is generally poor at drafting. They also generally misvalue their assets in trade, and lack strategy of the kind of assets to trade for given their position.
This trade is just another example of that, IMO. By no means the most egregious one though. Just a small brick in that wall.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,283
- And1: 9,002
- Joined: Feb 19, 2002
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Peelboy wrote:MrFortune3 wrote:Here's what I take from this and many other threads. People hate the draft picks that AKME make and they loathe the job they have done in developing them. Then in the same breath they get pissed that they aren't gathering more draft picks instead of players...
Lonzo is an injury prone expiring contract, there is nothing wrong with nabbing Okoro for him.
Analogy: I think you’re a terrible chef whose food is near inedible. I can also be upset that you buy spoiled produce at excessive prices.
Some is generally poor at drafting. They also generally misvalue their assets in trade, and lack strategy of the kind of assets to trade for given their position.
This trade is just another example of that, IMO. By no means the most egregious one though. Just a small brick in that wall.
My issue with AKME is that they don't try to acquire additional draft picks. it's NBA currency and the team needs to find it's franchise player to build around.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,283
- And1: 9,002
- Joined: Feb 19, 2002
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
DropStep wrote:We got our own pick back in the Lavine/Fox trade. Lonzo was a 1 for 1 player trade. So was Caruso. 1 for 1 player trades seem pretty rare, no? It's almost like AKME would just rather not deal with picks, especially other people's picks, whose value you have no control over. Just keep them, we're good? lol. I think and hope that it's kind of a joke when people say AK hates draft picks, but it's starting to feel kind of weird. Both of these trades are perfectly even? Not even a second going either direction, or a swap of seconds? He doesn't seem to be looking for lottery tickets or to swindle anyone for value, it feels like he's just looking for fit, to the scheme and to the timeline. But one of his prime duties is negotiating for value, both with players and other teams. This is a cheap shot... but is he doing it?
I think you're right that he doesn't try to get draft picks. This is a guy who turned down taking on Harrison Barnes to get the Kings swap rights.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,666
- And1: 35,730
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Cavs fan here. I come in peace. If you're looking for a reason to be bullish on Okoro, he had some of the best impact stats (on/off, +/-) on the Cavs every year since his rookie year.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,995
- And1: 2,585
- Joined: Jul 24, 2002
- Location: Munich (Germany)
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Thanks for bringing some perspective here!jbk1234 wrote:Cavs fan here. I come in peace. If you're looking for a reason to be bullish on Okoro, he had some of the best impact stats (on/off, +/-) on the Cavs every year since his rookie year.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,253
- And1: 4,216
- Joined: Aug 07, 2010
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
jbk1234 wrote:Cavs fan here. I come in peace. If you're looking for a reason to be bullish on Okoro, he had some of the best impact stats (on/off, +/-) on the Cavs every year since his rookie year.
Thanks-I am more optimistic than most here on this deal, and I loved Ball (too bad that player is probably done)
White/Jones/Carter
Okoro/Ayo/Terry
Giddey/Huerter/Phillips
Matas/Pwill/JSmith
Vuc (let's deal him too)/Collins/JSmith
Play fast
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Senior
- Posts: 657
- And1: 297
- Joined: Jan 12, 2025
- Location: Planet Earth
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
pipfan wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Cavs fan here. I come in peace. If you're looking for a reason to be bullish on Okoro, he had some of the best impact stats (on/off, +/-) on the Cavs every year since his rookie year.
Thanks-I am more optimistic than most here on this deal, and I loved Ball (too bad that player is probably done)
White/Jones/Carter
Okoro/Ayo/Terry
Giddey/Huerter/Phillips
Matas/Pwill/JSmith
Vuc (let's deal him too)/Collins/JSmith
Play fast
Same here.. Okoro at least plays with high energy, hustles and goes for rebounds compared to PWill..
Lets hope this lights then fire under Pat's ass a bit and he comes back leaner, faster and ready to fight for SF starting role.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,618
- And1: 802
- Joined: Apr 07, 2011
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
jbk1234 wrote:Cavs fan here. I come in peace. If you're looking for a reason to be bullish on Okoro, he had some of the best impact stats (on/off, +/-) on the Cavs every year since his rookie year.
Do you think trading for Lonzo Ball means you're more than likely will lose Ty Jerome?
ROLES & HOLES
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
- Andi Obst
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,450
- And1: 6,811
- Joined: Mar 11, 2013
- Location: Germany
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
I hated the deal initially and still don't love it, but it's okay I guess. Pretty likely that Okoro helps you more than Lonzo next year due to injuries. Cavs save some money but don't save enough money to attach assets. I get it.
Would love to see the exact deadline offers the Bulls got for Lonzo.
Would love to see the exact deadline offers the Bulls got for Lonzo.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,175
- And1: 2,817
- Joined: Apr 03, 2002
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Red8911 wrote:NecessaryEvil wrote:
We had so many here bching and moaning that the Bulls will keep the same exact team as last year because Eversley mentioned it in the presser.
Never believe what they say in those pressers, most of it is BS. They can’t say they want to trade their players for obvious reasons and instead lie.
Wait. So don't believe what the teams General Manager says, despite it being what they've done for most of their tenure. But do believe a journalist on twitter that reports the complete opposite of what the team has done for several years now.
Here to argue about nonsensical things and suck away your joy. 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
- BullChit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,903
- And1: 3,874
- Joined: Jan 17, 2011
- Location: Sydney, Australia
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Muzbar wrote:Red8911 wrote:NecessaryEvil wrote:
We had so many here bching and moaning that the Bulls will keep the same exact team as last year because Eversley mentioned it in the presser.
Never believe what they say in those pressers, most of it is BS. They can’t say they want to trade their players for obvious reasons and instead lie.
Wait. So don't believe what the teams General Manager says, despite it being what they've done for most of their tenure. But do believe a journalist on twitter that reports the complete opposite of what the team has done for several years now.
Fake front office news.
eMar arnell eRozen... The "D" stands for "Defence"
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,666
- And1: 35,730
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Rose2Boozer wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Cavs fan here. I come in peace. If you're looking for a reason to be bullish on Okoro, he had some of the best impact stats (on/off, +/-) on the Cavs every year since his rookie year.
Do you think trading for Lonzo Ball means you're more than likely will lose Ty Jerome?
Almost certainly. We only had early bird rights.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.