Potential Zach Trade Partners? 24/25 Edition
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
-
ChiTownHero1992
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,521
- And1: 2,363
- Joined: Apr 28, 2017
-
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
[x][/x]
Lets get that Firesale started, everything must go! Clearance available!
First Caruso
Next Lavine
Then Vuc
Then DDR
Lets get that Firesale started, everything must go! Clearance available!
First Caruso
Next Lavine
Then Vuc
Then DDR
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 37,367
- And1: 30,411
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
I fully expect us to trade the 11th pick to unload Zach.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
-
kodo
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,121
- And1: 15,513
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
- Location: Northshore Burbs
-
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
I don't understand the Sac thing, they don't have cap space. The entire reason we're trading Lavine is we need to duck the tax to pay Demar & Patrick $60M+. Philly & Utah make sense since they're cap space teams who will probably whiff on their prime FA targets (Paul George, Siakam, etc..).
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
-
jnrjr79
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,751
- And1: 4,012
- Joined: May 27, 2003
- Location: Chicago
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
kodo wrote:I don't understand the Sac thing, they don't have cap space. The entire reason we're trading Lavine is we need to duck the tax to pay Demar & Patrick $60M+. Philly & Utah make sense since they're cap space teams who will probably whiff on their prime FA targets (Paul George, Siakam, etc..).
I would tend to agree, unless the bulls are ready to move on from DeMar, and then maybe he becomes the way you clear space. I guess letting him walk does, too, but seems like bad asset management to me.
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
- Michael Jackson
- Forum Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 29,763
- And1: 11,798
- Joined: Jun 15, 2001
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
jnrjr79 wrote:kodo wrote:I don't understand the Sac thing, they don't have cap space. The entire reason we're trading Lavine is we need to duck the tax to pay Demar & Patrick $60M+. Philly & Utah make sense since they're cap space teams who will probably whiff on their prime FA targets (Paul George, Siakam, etc..).
I would tend to agree, unless the bulls are ready to move on from DeMar, and then maybe he becomes the way you clear space. I guess letting him walk does, too, but seems like bad asset management to me.
Have to find the S&T partner for DDR which makes it trickier, that being said most teams that wooulsd want DDR don't have capspace so that works in our favor, also likely don't have much to trade anyone would want but better than nothing.
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
- nomorezorro
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,243
- And1: 10,350
- Joined: Jun 22, 2006
- Location: bfk
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
giddey/white/williams/collins/vuc or giddey/white/huerter/barnes/vuc are not compelling lineups, per se, but they're a clear step in a new semi-coherent direction, at least, and it probably gets us to a pretty good draft pick next year. bonus points if you could swap out vuc for basically anyone else, ideally a young defense-oriented C.
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
- DuckIII
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 71,766
- And1: 37,126
- Joined: Nov 25, 2003
- Location: On my high horse.
-
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
It’s been my belief all along that this notion that Zach isn’t a winner worth his contract is insane. It just depends on the team and the role. And to me the team that I have always said should be flat out targeting Zach is Philly. I love him playing the off ball third option in Philly. Makes them an instant contender.
You put Zach on a real contender as a third option, and he will single handedly explode to win you some playoff games here and there. He can be critical to a championship contender. I really believe that. It just has to be the right role.
To me Philly would be crazy not to want him as a priority get.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
- DuckIII
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 71,766
- And1: 37,126
- Joined: Nov 25, 2003
- Location: On my high horse.
-
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
HomoSapien wrote:I fully expect us to trade the 11th pick to unload Zach.
No way. No way AK is THAT bad. Surely he’d try to rehab Zach for a few months before giving up valuable assets to trade him. That would be beyond incompetence even for these guys. Won’t happen.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
- kulaz3000
- Forum Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 42,679
- And1: 24,900
- Joined: Oct 25, 2006
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
I actually believe that Jazz has some interest. I could see that they trade for him for little to nothing, up his value, and then flip him for actual assets.
Why so serious?
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
- Mk0
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,563
- And1: 21,522
- Joined: Jul 02, 2010
-
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
KC floating that since we can't attach Caruso to trade Zach we may have to include Ayo in his place.
He said he doesn't like the trade but really doesn't like this trade if that is the case.
We really needed another asset in the Caruso trade. Our coffers are still empty.
He said he doesn't like the trade but really doesn't like this trade if that is the case.
We really needed another asset in the Caruso trade. Our coffers are still empty.
I AM A BUSINESS MAN NOW
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
-
jump
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,154
- And1: 1,509
- Joined: Jun 15, 2001
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
What would a 76er trade look like? They hardly have anyone on the roster?
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
-
Muzbar
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,285
- And1: 2,906
- Joined: Apr 03, 2002
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
-
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
jump wrote:What would a 76er trade look like? They hardly have anyone on the roster?
It would be centered around the draft capital they acquired from trading Harden I'd imagine.
Here to argue about nonsensical things and suck away your joy. 

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
- nomorezorro
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,243
- And1: 10,350
- Joined: Jun 22, 2006
- Location: bfk
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
DuckIII wrote:HomoSapien wrote:I fully expect us to trade the 11th pick to unload Zach.
No way. No way AK is THAT bad. Surely he’d try to rehab Zach for a few months before giving up valuable assets to trade him. That would be beyond incompetence even for these guys. Won’t happen.
we're talking to danny ainge about dumping a distressed asset we clearly want to get rid of ASAP...prepare for the worst, man
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
- Jcool0
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,352
- And1: 9,317
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
- Location: Illinois
-
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
-
kodo
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,121
- And1: 15,513
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
- Location: Northshore Burbs
-
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
jump wrote:What would a 76er trade look like? They hardly have anyone on the roster?
They get Zach, we get the smallest salary back they can send. We're not trading Lavine because he doesn't produce, we're trading him because we need that cap space to pay Derozan.
The return for a Lavine trade is the opportunity to pay Derozan $40M per year.
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
-
Dez
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,726
- And1: 9,292
- Joined: Jul 23, 2011
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
-
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
Mk0 wrote:KC floating that since we can't attach Caruso to trade Zach we may have to include Ayo in his place.
He said he doesn't like the trade but really doesn't like this trade if that is the case.
We really needed another asset in the Caruso trade. Our coffers are still empty.
KC isn't a thinker.
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
-
MGB8
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,001
- And1: 3,624
- Joined: Jul 20, 2001
- Location: Philly
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
I’m telling you… what I read in between the lines from what is being reported by most (Crowley excepted) is that there is ZERO market for LaVine, and that AKME isn’t interested in attaching an asset to move him. Monk resigning reinforces that - likely taking one potential landing spot out of the running.
I think LaVine is not going anywhere in the short term. And, given the lux tax restrictions, not so sure DDR will end up coming back. Would have expected an announcement very quickly on that if he was.
I think LaVine is not going anywhere in the short term. And, given the lux tax restrictions, not so sure DDR will end up coming back. Would have expected an announcement very quickly on that if he was.
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 37,367
- And1: 30,411
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
DuckIII wrote:HomoSapien wrote:I fully expect us to trade the 11th pick to unload Zach.
No way. No way AK is THAT bad. Surely he’d try to rehab Zach for a few months before giving up valuable assets to trade him. That would be beyond incompetence even for these guys. Won’t happen.
For what’s it’s worth, KC said on the Bulls Talk Podcast tonight that he thought the Bulls would have to add an incentive for teams to take LaVine and wondered if they would trade Ayo to get rid of him.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
- DuckIII
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 71,766
- And1: 37,126
- Joined: Nov 25, 2003
- Location: On my high horse.
-
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
HomoSapien wrote:DuckIII wrote:HomoSapien wrote:I fully expect us to trade the 11th pick to unload Zach.
No way. No way AK is THAT bad. Surely he’d try to rehab Zach for a few months before giving up valuable assets to trade him. That would be beyond incompetence even for these guys. Won’t happen.
For what’s it’s worth, KC said on the Bulls Talk Podcast tonight that he thought the Bulls would have to add an incentive for teams to take LaVine and wondered if they would trade Ayo to get rid of him.
**** that. I can accept trading Lavine at base value to dump him or even take a minimally negative asset, but I absolutely draw the line at adding one of our few positive assets. That’s insanity. I just can’t believe it would happen. It’s too crazy.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
-
MrSparkle
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,410
- And1: 11,204
- Joined: Jul 31, 2003
- Location: chicago
Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition.
I also don’t believe Bulls need to add an asset to shed Lavine. Give me a break.
If so, AKME are just a really terrible FO.
If so, AKME are just a really terrible FO.









