This goes back to my point I made even last year. Jokic is the cream of the crop best player. If he is the best, he should be MVP. Dont give me that crap about voter fatigue. If you are the best, then someone has to knock you out to be the best.
Wayne Gretzky won 8 straight MVPs and 9 of 10. That is how it should be.
What the NBA is doing is making a sidebar and an asterisk to why the other guy won. Because when you look back at it historically, it won't make any sense.
Cause there is no way to justify last year winning MVP getting
26.4 pts 12.4r rebs 9 asts
This year avg
28.9 pts 12.9 rebs 10.6 asts and possibly not winning MVP?
That makes no sense.
This year in particular, he could win MVP in any year in any era, in the existence of the league.
I think SGA is great, but no one would ever say SGA is better than Jokic. Not even this season. But voters want to say well Jokic has won it the last few years and maybe SGA should get one, so lets give it to him. That is nonsense.
What they need to do is like create a secondary achievement. Offensive MVP or something on those lines.