HomoSapien wrote:All I'm getting from this is that Carlos Boozer would be the greatest of all time if he tried.
Well here's a good summary of Boozer's offense, which involves more than trying harder.
Ron Harper wrote:BullDawg wrote:Ron Harper wrote:Does anyone here think Boozer just needs to sit?
I don't.
I just feel that he's been so disruptive on offense. Similar to what John Salmons used to do to our offense. You kind of need him there, but Bulls just couldn't get on a roll with him on the floor.
I like Boozer out there because in the playoffs you are going to need those clean iso buckets. Step up, in rhythm, and knock it down. Keep a nice flow and pace while the D tightens up. Boozer cannot do this anymore. He hesitates (Salmons jab-step anyone?) because he knows and the defender knows that Boozer isn't going to be taking that ball to the hoop. No first step, can't spin, nothing. Just a series of half-shot fakes and a lean back jumper.
And yes, they were falling for him, but it still wasn't the crisp Boozer we as fans were seeing in the regular season (pre January).
I think the writing is on the wall. We go as Rose goes, and as is, Boozer does not alleviate the pressure that is put on Rose. Boozer is a stagnant body on the floor. We need an active player who is going to crash the boards, protect the rim on defense, and get the pace of the game cranked way up.
Rose in the open floor, Korver spotting up, Deng filling...just MOVEMENT. I know it's not all Boozer, but it is Boozer. His positives are not there, and in the playoffs where matchups are key, I ask...What mismatch does Boozer exactly provide...from anywhere on the court?
I do like a healthy Boozer, he's a nice player. And to his credit the last few games he has been on the floor, talking a lot on defense, and giving an effort. It's just not there for him in this series.
And that didn't even touch upon his defense, which is historically bad.












