Michael Beasley an option?
Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23
Michael Beasley an option?
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 14
- And1: 5
- Joined: Nov 03, 2012
Michael Beasley an option?
Beasley is done in China as the season has ended. Maybe an option to upgrade the Bulls' SF position? Thoughts?
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,003
- And1: 15,415
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
- Location: Northshore Burbs
-
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
Can't see our FO going for a guy like that.
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,199
- And1: 2,276
- Joined: Nov 15, 2014
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
Yeah, lets put the dealer in the locker room. That should end well.
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,042
- And1: 5,965
- Joined: Jul 04, 2004
- Location: Palm Bay, FL
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
Nope and Thibs won't play him
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,325
- And1: 1,962
- Joined: May 24, 2007
- Location: Bazinga
-
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
Thibs will barely play "Ray" much less play a known knucklehead like Beasley.
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
- WIN
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,590
- And1: 2,821
- Joined: Jul 07, 2004
- Location: Realm of RealGM
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
The only thing is that he really isn't an upgrade, not to mention that he's also a headcase.
Until the Bulls figure out how to play well with the guys they already have, I don't even want to see any moves made, especially for guys like Beasley who would just be added fire to an already burning fire of discord & inconsistency.
Until the Bulls figure out how to play well with the guys they already have, I don't even want to see any moves made, especially for guys like Beasley who would just be added fire to an already burning fire of discord & inconsistency.
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 7
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 29, 2015
-
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
It's already been tried on other teams. Didn't work. He's in China for a reason.
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
- dougthonus
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 58,665
- And1: 18,775
- Joined: Dec 22, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
Regardless of Beasley's mental issues, he doesn't seem to help the problems we currently have [3 point shooting and defense].
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,629
- And1: 805
- Joined: Apr 07, 2011
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
If the Bulls are not going to play McDermott, I don't see why not. It's simple to me, Beasley is a better basketball player than players in the Bulls rotation. He's by no means a savior, but he'd probably outplay Snell, Hinrich, and Moore by a decent margin. Not to mention, Beasley will be on a good value contact.
The Bulls can't continue to be blinded by perfect scenarios, and then play the who knew card when players perform well elsewhere.
The Bulls can't continue to be blinded by perfect scenarios, and then play the who knew card when players perform well elsewhere.
ROLES & HOLES
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,003
- And1: 15,415
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
- Location: Northshore Burbs
-
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
Rose2Boozer wrote:If the Bulls are not going to play McDermott, I don't see why not. It's simple to me, Beasley is a better basketball player than players in the Bulls rotation. He's by no means a savior, but he'd probably outplay Snell, Hinrich, and Moore by a decent margin. Not to mention, Beasley will be on a good value contact.
The Bulls can't continue to be blinded by perfect scenarios, and then play the who knew card when players perform well elsewhere.
Hinrich & Snell aren't in there to shoot the ball. They're in there to play defense. Beasley is a worse defender than even those two, which is saying a lot.
Beasley is a scorer. So unless Beasley is better than Rose/Butler/Gasol, he's not an upgrade.
If you're saying we should replace defensive players and go all offense (mostly), you want a different coach. Thibs has to have some no-offense defensive guys in his lineups. If he was OK with going with mostly offense Brooks would have replaced Hinrich eons ago.
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,629
- And1: 805
- Joined: Apr 07, 2011
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
No, Snell and Hinrich are in the rotation to knock down open looks. They just suck at it so people try to lean on their defense. I haven't been impressed by Snell or Hinrich in any facet of the game.
ROLES & HOLES
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,381
- And1: 1,783
- Joined: Aug 13, 2010
-
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
This is so anti-Bulls to do. I'd be willing to look at this, see what kind of shape he's in (not sure how much you really have to be to ball in China). But then again, Bulls would never bring him on board.
Kris Bryant will go down as the greatest Chicago athlete after MJ
edit 7/30/21: okay maybe not, but it was a fun ride nonetheless
edit 7/30/21: okay maybe not, but it was a fun ride nonetheless
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
- Maroko
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,593
- And1: 11,432
- Joined: Dec 22, 2012
- Location: Paris
-
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
It's funny because we have a lot of pro-beasley and they always brought that option every month in the Heat board
He is very talented but his defense just sucks so he wont have the favor of coach Thib

He is very talented but his defense just sucks so he wont have the favor of coach Thib
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
- IcemanGervin
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,654
- And1: 1,535
- Joined: Jun 27, 2012
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
With this organization no chance
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,559
- And1: 1,225
- Joined: Apr 16, 2010
-
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
JordanRoseMVP wrote:It's already been tried on other teams. Didn't work. He's in China for a reason.
tell that to hassan whiteside
Derrick Rose & The Chicago Bulls - Fuel to the Fire http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U80xGPG7yiw
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 37,296
- And1: 30,316
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
I agree with Doug. There are certainly situations where I would be open to adding Bease to the team, but this isn't one of them. He doesn't help us with what we need help with.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
- dougthonus
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 58,665
- And1: 18,775
- Joined: Dec 22, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
Rose2Boozer wrote:I don't see why not. It's simple to me, Beasley is a better basketball player than players in the Bulls rotation.
He was 50/50 to get a non guaranteed contract this summer in the NBA. I think it's a stretch to say that he's better than anyone in the NBA.
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
- Axl Rose
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,840
- And1: 4,091
- Joined: Jul 03, 2013
- Location: Superunknown
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
nah he's a bum
with this team near collapse last thing we need to do is add another Larry Hughes to finish the job
with this team near collapse last thing we need to do is add another Larry Hughes to finish the job
I don't do the dishes, I throw them in the crib
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,129
- And1: 11,815
- Joined: Jun 26, 2014
-
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
kodo wrote:Rose2Boozer wrote:If the Bulls are not going to play McDermott, I don't see why not. It's simple to me, Beasley is a better basketball player than players in the Bulls rotation. He's by no means a savior, but he'd probably outplay Snell, Hinrich, and Moore by a decent margin. Not to mention, Beasley will be on a good value contact.
The Bulls can't continue to be blinded by perfect scenarios, and then play the who knew card when players perform well elsewhere.
Hinrich & Snell aren't in there to shoot the ball. They're in there to play defense. Beasley is a worse defender than even those two, which is saying a lot.
Beasley is a scorer. So unless Beasley is better than Rose/Butler/Gasol, he's not an upgrade.
If you're saying we should replace defensive players and go all offense (mostly), you want a different coach. Thibs has to have some no-offense defensive guys in his lineups. If he was OK with going with mostly offense Brooks would have replaced Hinrich eons ago.
All players should be able to shoot, especially guards. Just because they suck at it and we have nothing better on the roster doesn't mean it isn't part of the job description.
Re: Michael Beasley an option?
- RoundMoundOfRebound
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,365
- And1: 13,708
- Joined: Oct 18, 2001
- Location: Chicago,KC,St. Louis,Seattle, South FL
-