ImageImage

Draft Position Watch Thread Locked into #9 spot

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,762
And1: 1,060
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Draft Position Watch Thread Locked into #9 spot 

Post#1 » by wichmae » Wed Aug 3, 2016 12:47 am

Ill update this after every series. Realistically were probably not catching ATL, CIN, or MIN. Oakland post deadline probably is going to lose more too. As long as we are top 5 we should be good. The upcoming draft is very deep with college pitching and HS outfielders.

1 Atlanta Braves 37 68 .352
2 Minnesota Twins 41 64 .390
3 Cincinnati Reds 42 62 .404
4 Tampa Bay Rays 42 62 .404
5 Arizona Diamondbacks 43 63
6 San Diego Padres 46 60 .434
7 Oakland Athletics 47 58 .448
8 Los Angeles Angels 47 58 .448
9 Philadelphia Phillies 48 59 .449
10 Milwaukee Brewers 47 57 .452
11 Kansas City Royals 50 55 .476
12 Chicago White Sox 51 54 .486
User avatar
Sky Bucks
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,664
And1: 1,361
Joined: Jan 05, 2014
Location: New Bizzle
       

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 10th 

Post#2 » by Sky Bucks » Wed Aug 3, 2016 3:27 am

REALLY REALLY important stretch of games for draft position over these next 2 weeks. Let's rack up those losses please :D
#Make'em Believe On Wisconsin
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,675
And1: 27,265
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 10th 

Post#3 » by trwi7 » Wed Aug 3, 2016 5:21 am

I don't see us getting any higher than 7th unfortunately and even that's not a given. I say we end up tied with the Angels at 9th and we get the tiebreaker.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 10th 

Post#4 » by El Duderino » Wed Aug 3, 2016 6:05 am

I see us finishing somewhere in that 6-10 grouping.

The bullpen will be a big factor. I expect Thornburg to thrive at closer, but many close games are won and lost with guys who come in the 6th-8th innings. You'd think Torres can't continue being lights out and Knebel is another wild card, but bullpens without proven shut down arms can be so unpredictable.
coolhandluke121
RealGM
Posts: 13,942
And1: 7,316
Joined: Sep 23, 2007

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 10th 

Post#5 » by coolhandluke121 » Wed Aug 3, 2016 12:08 pm

Let the record show I never got worried until they swept the Pirates and still hadn't traded anyone except Hill. Still got 11 more consecutive games against the 4 worst teams in the NL but then it's a freakin' gauntlet. 19 at home, 27 on the road starting after a day off on the 15th. With the Rockies winning last night, only 6 (!) of those 46 games are against teams that are currently under .500. Last night would have been a nice loss and I had hopes of Braun going to the DL, but we got this.
Wut we've got here is... faaailure... to communakate.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,459
And1: 4,422
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 10th 

Post#6 » by Kerb Hohl » Wed Aug 3, 2016 2:28 pm

The Padres, Twins, and Angels strike me as teams that are still not an abomination right now. The Angels had an lol-worthy offense beyond Trout to open the year, but their pitching actually isn't terrible right now and they may keep winning as they have been of late with Skaggs throwing hard, Shoemaker, etc.

Twins got the opposite version of the luck they got last year (lucky last year, unlucky this year) but that offense is pretty potent right now and they are doing their best to screw up their own draft position.

Padres have some solid young players.

These teams could catch the Brewers. Hopefully we get throttled by the division down the stretch.
User avatar
Iheartfootball
Head Coach
Posts: 6,586
And1: 5,534
Joined: May 09, 2014
     

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 10th 

Post#7 » by Iheartfootball » Wed Aug 3, 2016 3:41 pm

trwi7 wrote:I don't see us getting any higher than 7th unfortunately and even that's not a given. I say we end up tied with the Angels at 9th and we get the tiebreaker.


Yeah, we traded a bunch of talent but the problem is so did those ahead of us. Kind of a bummer. 9th is disappointing.

I'm guessing the same **** teams this year are going to be the same **** teams next year as well. Difference is the Brewers will be awful from the get go.
Everybody wants to go to heaven but nobody wants to die.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,675
And1: 27,265
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 10th 

Post#8 » by trwi7 » Wed Aug 3, 2016 4:03 pm

Kerb Hohl wrote:Padres have some solid young players.


Like who? They have Myers and then it's complete ****.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,762
And1: 1,060
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 10th 

Post#9 » by wichmae » Wed Aug 3, 2016 4:10 pm

trwi7 wrote:
Kerb Hohl wrote:Padres have some solid young players.


Like who? They have Myers and then it's complete ****.

They are a pretty similar team. Schimpf has been hot with Jankowski and Dickerson as decent pieces but overall our roster is unfortunately probably better.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,459
And1: 4,422
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 10th 

Post#10 » by Kerb Hohl » Wed Aug 3, 2016 4:14 pm

trwi7 wrote:
Kerb Hohl wrote:Padres have some solid young players.


Like who? They have Myers and then it's complete ****.


Yeah, I guess I pulled my narrative from before the trade deadline and wasn't thinking. Dickerson, Schimpf, and possibly Blash will be decent to finish out the year, though.
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,762
And1: 1,060
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 10th 

Post#11 » by wichmae » Wed Aug 3, 2016 11:59 pm

Ill update this tonight or in the morning after the rest of MLB plays.
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,762
And1: 1,060
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 10th 8/4 

Post#12 » by wichmae » Thu Aug 4, 2016 4:28 am

1 Atlanta Braves 37 69
2 Minnesota Twins 42 64
3 Tampa Bay Rays 42 63
4 Arizona Diamondbacks 43 64
5 Cincinnati Reds 43 62
6 San Diego Padres 46 61
7 Oakland Athletics 47 59
8 Los Angeles Angels 48 58
9 Philadelphia Phillies 49 59
10 Milwaukee Brewers 48 57
11 Chicago White Sox 51 55
12 Kansas City Royals 51 55
User avatar
Sky Bucks
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,664
And1: 1,361
Joined: Jan 05, 2014
Location: New Bizzle
       

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 10th 8/4 

Post#13 » by Sky Bucks » Thu Aug 4, 2016 1:01 pm

wichmae wrote:
1 Atlanta Braves 37 69
2 Minnesota Twins 42 64
3 Tampa Bay Rays 42 63
4 Arizona Diamondbacks 43 64
5 Cincinnati Reds 43 62
6 San Diego Padres 46 61
7 Oakland Athletics 47 59
8 Los Angeles Angels 48 58
9 Philadelphia Phillies 49 59
10 Milwaukee Brewers 48 57
11 Chicago White Sox 51 55
12 Kansas City Royals 51 55

Brewers are 48-58
#Make'em Believe On Wisconsin
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,762
And1: 1,060
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 8th 8/4 

Post#14 » by wichmae » Thu Aug 4, 2016 2:44 pm

1 Atlanta Braves 38 69 .355
2 Arizona Diamondbacks 43 65 .398
3 Minnesota Twins 43 64 .402
4 Tampa Bay Rays 43 63 .406
5 Cincinnati Reds 43 63 .406
6 San Diego Padres 47 61 .435
7 Oakland Athletics 47 60 .439
8 Milwaukee Brewers 48 58 .453
9 Los Angeles Angels 49 58 .458
10 Philadelphia Phillies 50 59 .459
11 Kansas City Royals 51 56 .477
12 Chicago White Sox 51 56 .477
User avatar
Sky Bucks
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,664
And1: 1,361
Joined: Jan 05, 2014
Location: New Bizzle
       

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 8th 8/4 

Post#15 » by Sky Bucks » Thu Aug 4, 2016 4:20 pm

wichmae wrote:
1 Atlanta Braves 38 69 .355
2 Arizona Diamondbacks 43 65 .398
3 Minnesota Twins 43 64 .402
4 Tampa Bay Rays 43 63 .406
5 Cincinnati Reds 43 63 .406
6 San Diego Padres 47 61 .435
7 Oakland Athletics 47 60 .439
8 Milwaukee Brewers 48 58 .453
9 Los Angeles Angels 49 58 .458
10 Philadelphia Phillies 50 59 .459
11 Kansas City Royals 51 56 .477
12 Chicago White Sox 51 56 .477

:thumbsup:
#Make'em Believe On Wisconsin
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,762
And1: 1,060
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 8th 8/4 

Post#16 » by wichmae » Mon Aug 8, 2016 5:04 pm

1 Atlanta Braves 41 70 .369
2 Minnesota Twins 45 66 .405
3 Arizona Diamondbacks 45 66
4 Cincinnati Reds 45 65 .409
5 Tampa Bay Rays 45 65 .409
6 Oakland Athletics 48 63 .432
7 San Diego Padres 48 63 .432
8 Los Angeles Angels 49 62 .441
9 Milwaukee Brewers 49 60 .450
10 Philadelphia Phillies 52 61 .460
11 Kansas City Royals 53 58 .477
12 Chicago White Sox 53 58 .477
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 16,667
And1: 8,094
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 9th 8/8 

Post#17 » by jakecronus8 » Mon Aug 8, 2016 5:59 pm

Really puts into perspective how much of a mess the Angels are in. Their only choice might be to trade Trout and eat millions and millions of dollars in pay roll.
Do it for Chuck
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,459
And1: 4,422
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 9th 8/8 

Post#18 » by Kerb Hohl » Mon Aug 8, 2016 6:09 pm

jakecronus8 wrote:Really puts into perspective how much of a mess the Angels are in. Their only choice might be to trade Trout and eat millions and millions of dollars in pay roll.


Had a debate with RS on this months ago as their roster looked like the pile of trash that it is and he made a pretty good cause that you can't do it. You will probably never find a prospect package to match up with his value.
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,762
And1: 1,060
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 9th 8/8 

Post#19 » by wichmae » Mon Aug 8, 2016 6:23 pm

Kerb Hohl wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:Really puts into perspective how much of a mess the Angels are in. Their only choice might be to trade Trout and eat millions and millions of dollars in pay roll.


Had a debate with RS on this months ago as their roster looked like the pile of trash that it is and he made a pretty good cause that you can't do it. You will probably never find a prospect package to match up with his value.

No youll never get equal value but if I was the Angels I would call Boston and ask Moncada, Benintendi, Devers, Groome, and one of the young outfielders they have. I dont see a way Boston passes on getting the best player in the game.
coolhandluke121
RealGM
Posts: 13,942
And1: 7,316
Joined: Sep 23, 2007

Re: Draft Position Watch Thread Currently 8th 8/4 

Post#20 » by coolhandluke121 » Mon Aug 8, 2016 6:41 pm

wichmae wrote:1 Atlanta Braves----------------41 70 .369
2 Minnesota Twins------------45 66 .405
3 Arizona Diamondbacks--45 66 .405
4 Cincinnati Reds--------------45 65 .409
5 Tampa Bay Rays------------45 65 .409
6 Oakland Athletics-----------48 63 .432
7 San Diego Padres-----------48 63 .432
8 Los Angeles Angels--------49 62 .441
9 Milwaukee Brewers--------49 60 .450
10 Philadelphia Phillies------52 61 .460
11 Kansas City Royals--------53 58 .477
12 Chicago White Sox--------53 58 .477


Bah. Thought I could use underscore to make it easier to process, but the way it displays doesn't line up with the way the text editor shows it.
Wut we've got here is... faaailure... to communakate.

Return to Milwaukee Brewers